The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Validating the breathing vigilance questionnaire for use in dysfunctional breathing

Validating the breathing vigilance questionnaire for use in dysfunctional breathing
Validating the breathing vigilance questionnaire for use in dysfunctional breathing
Background: dysfunctional breathing is common among people with and without primary respiratory pathology. While anxiety can contribute to dysfunctional breathing, the underpinning mechanism is unclear. One explanation is that anxiety induces conscious, vigilant monitoring of breathing, disrupting “automatic” breathing mechanics. We validated a new tool that quantifies such breathing-related “vigilance”: the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire (Breathe-VQ).

Methods: 323 healthy adults (mean (range) age 27.3 (18–71) years; 161 males) were analysed. We developed an initial Breathe-VQ (11 items, 1–5 Likert scale) based on the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Scale, using feedback from the target population and clinicians. At baseline, participants completed the Breathe-VQ, Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form 2 and Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (assessing general conscious processing). 83 people repeated the Breathe-VQ 3 weeks later.

Results: five items were removed based on item-level analysis. The resulting six-item Breathe-VQ questionnaire (score range 6–30) has excellent internal (α=0.892) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation 0.810), a minimal detectable change of 6.5 and no floor/ceiling effects. Validity was evidenced by significant positive correlations with trait anxiety and conscious processing scores (r=0.35–0.46). Participants at high risk of having dysfunctional breathing (NQ >23; n=76) had significantly higher Breathe-VQ score (mean±sd 19.1±5.0) than low-risk peers (n=225; mean±sd 13.8±5.4; p<0.001). In this “high risk of dysfunctional breathing” group, Breathe-VQ and NQ scores were significantly associated (p=0.005), even when controlling for risk factors (e.g. trait anxiety).

Conclusions: the Breathe-VQ is a valid and reliable tool to measure breathing vigilance. High breathing vigilance may contribute to dysfunctional breathing and could represent a therapeutic target. Further research is warranted to test Breathe-VQ's prognostic value and assess intervention effects.
0903-1936
Steinmann, Jennifer
95aba9cf-8652-4b1c-a8cd-325c4d3225e7
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Ellmers, Toby J.
8d63d928-df34-472e-940e-f7065da856f4
Jones, Mandy
1bc232df-1805-40df-8ea9-232939a1517e
MacBean, Vicky
78da168b-3719-4cec-bab2-0edf2467424c
Kal, Elmar
04e17d07-b575-4873-8ca3-3a4032062db6
Steinmann, Jennifer
95aba9cf-8652-4b1c-a8cd-325c4d3225e7
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Ellmers, Toby J.
8d63d928-df34-472e-940e-f7065da856f4
Jones, Mandy
1bc232df-1805-40df-8ea9-232939a1517e
MacBean, Vicky
78da168b-3719-4cec-bab2-0edf2467424c
Kal, Elmar
04e17d07-b575-4873-8ca3-3a4032062db6

Steinmann, Jennifer, Lewis, Adam, Ellmers, Toby J., Jones, Mandy, MacBean, Vicky and Kal, Elmar (2023) Validating the breathing vigilance questionnaire for use in dysfunctional breathing. European Respiratory Journal, 61 (6). (doi:10.1183/13993003.00031-2023).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: dysfunctional breathing is common among people with and without primary respiratory pathology. While anxiety can contribute to dysfunctional breathing, the underpinning mechanism is unclear. One explanation is that anxiety induces conscious, vigilant monitoring of breathing, disrupting “automatic” breathing mechanics. We validated a new tool that quantifies such breathing-related “vigilance”: the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire (Breathe-VQ).

Methods: 323 healthy adults (mean (range) age 27.3 (18–71) years; 161 males) were analysed. We developed an initial Breathe-VQ (11 items, 1–5 Likert scale) based on the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Scale, using feedback from the target population and clinicians. At baseline, participants completed the Breathe-VQ, Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form 2 and Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (assessing general conscious processing). 83 people repeated the Breathe-VQ 3 weeks later.

Results: five items were removed based on item-level analysis. The resulting six-item Breathe-VQ questionnaire (score range 6–30) has excellent internal (α=0.892) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation 0.810), a minimal detectable change of 6.5 and no floor/ceiling effects. Validity was evidenced by significant positive correlations with trait anxiety and conscious processing scores (r=0.35–0.46). Participants at high risk of having dysfunctional breathing (NQ >23; n=76) had significantly higher Breathe-VQ score (mean±sd 19.1±5.0) than low-risk peers (n=225; mean±sd 13.8±5.4; p<0.001). In this “high risk of dysfunctional breathing” group, Breathe-VQ and NQ scores were significantly associated (p=0.005), even when controlling for risk factors (e.g. trait anxiety).

Conclusions: the Breathe-VQ is a valid and reliable tool to measure breathing vigilance. High breathing vigilance may contribute to dysfunctional breathing and could represent a therapeutic target. Further research is warranted to test Breathe-VQ's prognostic value and assess intervention effects.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 March 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 June 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488693
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488693
ISSN: 0903-1936
PURE UUID: 4c692c80-d79e-48cf-9a48-e2114f62498b
ORCID for Adam Lewis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8823

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Apr 2024 16:43
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jennifer Steinmann
Author: Adam Lewis ORCID iD
Author: Toby J. Ellmers
Author: Mandy Jones
Author: Vicky MacBean
Author: Elmar Kal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×