The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Eligibility for lung volume reduction in patients with COPD attending pulmonary rehabilitation

Eligibility for lung volume reduction in patients with COPD attending pulmonary rehabilitation
Eligibility for lung volume reduction in patients with COPD attending pulmonary rehabilitation
Background: lung volume reduction (LVR) therapies are highly effective in appropriately selected patients with COPD. NICE (2018) guidance recommends offering a respiratory review for LVR assessment at the end of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), if certain criteria apply. Few data exist on likely numbers potentially eligible according to these criteria [1].

Methods: data from the 2015 and 2017 UK Royal College of Physicians National Asthma and COPD Audits were used to identify numbers of patients completing PR potentially eligible to be assessed for LVR based on NICE guidelines; FEV1<50%, 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) ≥140m, ex or non smoker and limiting breathlessness [1]. We used a cut off of >80m for the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and breathlessness criteria of either MRC dyspnoea score >3 or ≥3.

Results: 8,295 (55.7%) of 14,889 patients in programs using ISWT or 6MWD to assess change in exercise capacity completed PR, and 4,856 (32.6%) had complete data recorded. Of these 310 (6.4%) were eligible to be considered for LVR assessment, at a breathlessness threshold of MRC score >3. Relaxing the criteria to include MRC≥3, meant 881 (18.1%) would be eligible.

Conclusions: a systematic approach to identify potential candidates for LVR, during and at the end of PR, is desirable. Approaches for the appropriate evaluation of non-completers also need to be considered.
0903-1936
Buttery, Sara
a93f2fbc-4c73-4b9d-82c0-95a19a8b6aa0
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Kemp, Samuel V.
9dd165a6-b64d-4910-b043-d2f4d44ecbb4
Quint, Jennifer K.
22800655-8987-4464-8385-7f08860c92f9
Steiner, Michael C.
ecb02779-579c-48df-911d-cb0d992a2a85
Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
91e9a2af-8ab3-4671-b766-761e82bd5310
Buttery, Sara
a93f2fbc-4c73-4b9d-82c0-95a19a8b6aa0
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Kemp, Samuel V.
9dd165a6-b64d-4910-b043-d2f4d44ecbb4
Quint, Jennifer K.
22800655-8987-4464-8385-7f08860c92f9
Steiner, Michael C.
ecb02779-579c-48df-911d-cb0d992a2a85
Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
91e9a2af-8ab3-4671-b766-761e82bd5310

Buttery, Sara, Lewis, Adam, Kemp, Samuel V., Quint, Jennifer K., Steiner, Michael C. and Hopkinson, Nicholas S. (2020) Eligibility for lung volume reduction in patients with COPD attending pulmonary rehabilitation. European Respiratory Journal, 56 (64), [4096]. (doi:10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2020.4096).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: lung volume reduction (LVR) therapies are highly effective in appropriately selected patients with COPD. NICE (2018) guidance recommends offering a respiratory review for LVR assessment at the end of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), if certain criteria apply. Few data exist on likely numbers potentially eligible according to these criteria [1].

Methods: data from the 2015 and 2017 UK Royal College of Physicians National Asthma and COPD Audits were used to identify numbers of patients completing PR potentially eligible to be assessed for LVR based on NICE guidelines; FEV1<50%, 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) ≥140m, ex or non smoker and limiting breathlessness [1]. We used a cut off of >80m for the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and breathlessness criteria of either MRC dyspnoea score >3 or ≥3.

Results: 8,295 (55.7%) of 14,889 patients in programs using ISWT or 6MWD to assess change in exercise capacity completed PR, and 4,856 (32.6%) had complete data recorded. Of these 310 (6.4%) were eligible to be considered for LVR assessment, at a breathlessness threshold of MRC score >3. Relaxing the criteria to include MRC≥3, meant 881 (18.1%) would be eligible.

Conclusions: a systematic approach to identify potential candidates for LVR, during and at the end of PR, is desirable. Approaches for the appropriate evaluation of non-completers also need to be considered.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 28 October 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488919
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488919
ISSN: 0903-1936
PURE UUID: eaad6ffb-c9d5-496a-9cee-cebd02318c06
ORCID for Adam Lewis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8823

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Apr 2024 16:42
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sara Buttery
Author: Adam Lewis ORCID iD
Author: Samuel V. Kemp
Author: Jennifer K. Quint
Author: Michael C. Steiner
Author: Nicholas S. Hopkinson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×