Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Introduction: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations progress the course of disease and impair lung function. Inhaled maintenance therapy reduces exacerbations. It is not yet established which inhaled therapy combination is best to reduce exacerbations, lung function decline and symptom burden.
Methods and analysis: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library will be searched for articles between January 2011 and May 2018 using a pre-specified search strategy. Conference proceedings will be searched. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis), randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case controlled studies comparing six interventions comprising different combinations of long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in unison or on their own. The primary outcome is the reduction in moderate-to-severe exacerbations. Secondary outcomes include: lung function, quality of life, mortality and other adverse events. Titles and abstracts will screened by the primary researcher. A second reviewer will repeat this on a proportion of records. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study framework will be used for data extraction. A network meta-analyses of outcomes from RCTs and real-world evidence will be integrated if feasible. The 95% credible interval will be used to assess the statistical significance of each summary effect. Ranking of interventions will be based on their surface under cumulative ranking area.
Ethics and dissemination: COPD exacerbations are burdensome to patients. We aim to report results that provide clinicians with a more informed choice of which inhaled therapy combinations are best to reduce exacerbations, improve disease burden and reduce lung function and exercise capacity decline, compared with the potential harms, in certain populations with COPD.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018088013.
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Axson, Eleanor L.
f8267f0a-217a-447f-bc68-4d0613e28b6a
Potts, James
479ba23b-ea9a-466e-a779-4cc1eee820f2
Tarnowska, Renelle
60c392c5-0269-4574-89fc-3a8246684f58
Vioix, Helene
2f37aa34-03cd-4c43-b224-5a90cdb22e8c
Quint, Jennifer K.
22800655-8987-4464-8385-7f08860c92f9
10 January 2022
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Axson, Eleanor L.
f8267f0a-217a-447f-bc68-4d0613e28b6a
Potts, James
479ba23b-ea9a-466e-a779-4cc1eee820f2
Tarnowska, Renelle
60c392c5-0269-4574-89fc-3a8246684f58
Vioix, Helene
2f37aa34-03cd-4c43-b224-5a90cdb22e8c
Quint, Jennifer K.
22800655-8987-4464-8385-7f08860c92f9
Lewis, Adam, Axson, Eleanor L., Potts, James, Tarnowska, Renelle, Vioix, Helene and Quint, Jennifer K.
(2022)
Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
BMJ Open, 9, [e025048].
(doi:10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-025048).
Abstract
Introduction: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations progress the course of disease and impair lung function. Inhaled maintenance therapy reduces exacerbations. It is not yet established which inhaled therapy combination is best to reduce exacerbations, lung function decline and symptom burden.
Methods and analysis: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library will be searched for articles between January 2011 and May 2018 using a pre-specified search strategy. Conference proceedings will be searched. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis), randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case controlled studies comparing six interventions comprising different combinations of long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in unison or on their own. The primary outcome is the reduction in moderate-to-severe exacerbations. Secondary outcomes include: lung function, quality of life, mortality and other adverse events. Titles and abstracts will screened by the primary researcher. A second reviewer will repeat this on a proportion of records. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study framework will be used for data extraction. A network meta-analyses of outcomes from RCTs and real-world evidence will be integrated if feasible. The 95% credible interval will be used to assess the statistical significance of each summary effect. Ranking of interventions will be based on their surface under cumulative ranking area.
Ethics and dissemination: COPD exacerbations are burdensome to patients. We aim to report results that provide clinicians with a more informed choice of which inhaled therapy combinations are best to reduce exacerbations, improve disease burden and reduce lung function and exercise capacity decline, compared with the potential harms, in certain populations with COPD.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018088013.
Text
e025048.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 February 2019
Published date: 10 January 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 488928
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488928
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 814a8f52-50bf-4850-936c-a7d3370c15b8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Apr 2024 16:51
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 02:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Adam Lewis
Author:
Eleanor L. Axson
Author:
James Potts
Author:
Renelle Tarnowska
Author:
Helene Vioix
Author:
Jennifer K. Quint
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics