The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Introduction: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations progress the course of disease and impair lung function. Inhaled maintenance therapy reduces exacerbations. It is not yet established which inhaled therapy combination is best to reduce exacerbations, lung function decline and symptom burden.

Methods and analysis: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library will be searched for articles between January 2011 and May 2018 using a pre-specified search strategy. Conference proceedings will be searched. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis), randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case controlled studies comparing six interventions comprising different combinations of long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in unison or on their own. The primary outcome is the reduction in moderate-to-severe exacerbations. Secondary outcomes include: lung function, quality of life, mortality and other adverse events. Titles and abstracts will screened by the primary researcher. A second reviewer will repeat this on a proportion of records. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study framework will be used for data extraction. A network meta-analyses of outcomes from RCTs and real-world evidence will be integrated if feasible. The 95% credible interval will be used to assess the statistical significance of each summary effect. Ranking of interventions will be based on their surface under cumulative ranking area.

Ethics and dissemination: COPD exacerbations are burdensome to patients. We aim to report results that provide clinicians with a more informed choice of which inhaled therapy combinations are best to reduce exacerbations, improve disease burden and reduce lung function and exercise capacity decline, compared with the potential harms, in certain populations with COPD.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018088013.
2044-6055
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Axson, Eleanor L.
f8267f0a-217a-447f-bc68-4d0613e28b6a
Potts, James
479ba23b-ea9a-466e-a779-4cc1eee820f2
Tarnowska, Renelle
60c392c5-0269-4574-89fc-3a8246684f58
Vioix, Helene
2f37aa34-03cd-4c43-b224-5a90cdb22e8c
Quint, Jennifer K.
22800655-8987-4464-8385-7f08860c92f9
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Axson, Eleanor L.
f8267f0a-217a-447f-bc68-4d0613e28b6a
Potts, James
479ba23b-ea9a-466e-a779-4cc1eee820f2
Tarnowska, Renelle
60c392c5-0269-4574-89fc-3a8246684f58
Vioix, Helene
2f37aa34-03cd-4c43-b224-5a90cdb22e8c
Quint, Jennifer K.
22800655-8987-4464-8385-7f08860c92f9

Lewis, Adam, Axson, Eleanor L., Potts, James, Tarnowska, Renelle, Vioix, Helene and Quint, Jennifer K. (2022) Protocol for a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of inhaled maintenance therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMJ Open, 9, [e025048]. (doi:10.1136/BMJOPEN-2018-025048).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations progress the course of disease and impair lung function. Inhaled maintenance therapy reduces exacerbations. It is not yet established which inhaled therapy combination is best to reduce exacerbations, lung function decline and symptom burden.

Methods and analysis: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library will be searched for articles between January 2011 and May 2018 using a pre-specified search strategy. Conference proceedings will be searched. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analysis), randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case controlled studies comparing six interventions comprising different combinations of long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids in unison or on their own. The primary outcome is the reduction in moderate-to-severe exacerbations. Secondary outcomes include: lung function, quality of life, mortality and other adverse events. Titles and abstracts will screened by the primary researcher. A second reviewer will repeat this on a proportion of records. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study framework will be used for data extraction. A network meta-analyses of outcomes from RCTs and real-world evidence will be integrated if feasible. The 95% credible interval will be used to assess the statistical significance of each summary effect. Ranking of interventions will be based on their surface under cumulative ranking area.

Ethics and dissemination: COPD exacerbations are burdensome to patients. We aim to report results that provide clinicians with a more informed choice of which inhaled therapy combinations are best to reduce exacerbations, improve disease burden and reduce lung function and exercise capacity decline, compared with the potential harms, in certain populations with COPD.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018088013.

Text
e025048.full - Version of Record
Download (311kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 January 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 February 2019
Published date: 10 January 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 488928
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488928
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: 814a8f52-50bf-4850-936c-a7d3370c15b8
ORCID for Adam Lewis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-8823

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Apr 2024 16:51
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Adam Lewis ORCID iD
Author: Eleanor L. Axson
Author: James Potts
Author: Renelle Tarnowska
Author: Helene Vioix
Author: Jennifer K. Quint

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×