Singing for Lung Health: evaluation of the British Lung Foundation programme
Singing for Lung Health: evaluation of the British Lung Foundation programme
Introduction: Singing for Lung Health (SLH) is a novel intervention for people with respiratory disease, including physical and vocal warm ups, rhythm and pitch games, repertoire and cool down/relaxation exercises. Groups are run by leaders who have received quality assured British Lung Foundation (BLF) training (Lewis A. et al, bmjresp 2017; 000216). Qualitative results suggest benefits to physical, mental and emotional health. Limited data also suggest objective improvements in measures of quality of life with SLH are achievable (Lewis A. et al, npjpcrm 2016;80). It is not known how effective the SLH groups supported by the BLF in the UK are.
Aims and objectives: to understand the clinical impact SLH has on people with respiratory disease.
Methods: the BLF conducted a questionnaire survey of 228 singers with respiratory disease from its SLH groups in 2016-2017. Questionnaires were administered prior to participants’ first session and after 12 weeks of singing.
Results: 113 (49.5%) of participants provided 12 week data. There were significant improvements in CAT score (Mean -1.4 CI: (0.25 - -2.48) (p = 0.017). Furthermore, 45% of singers reported reduced GP visits (p = 0.00002) and 18% reported reduced hospital admissions (p = 0.01). However, there were no significant improvements in general quality of life, anxiety, patient activation, breathlessness or inhaler use.
Conclusion: this evaluation found that participants in SLH groups report improvement in respiratory health-related quality of life and a reduction in healthcare utilisation. SLH has potential economic and health benefits. Therefore, to confirm these findings these endpoints should be evaluated further in large scale randomised controlled trials.
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Cave, Phoene
37cd6b00-7a8b-4001-b1ed-f949b6979231
Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
91e9a2af-8ab3-4671-b766-761e82bd5310
Lewis, Adam
71c83b66-d847-4aee-b716-b04d6de51450
Cave, Phoene
37cd6b00-7a8b-4001-b1ed-f949b6979231
Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
91e9a2af-8ab3-4671-b766-761e82bd5310
Lewis, Adam, Cave, Phoene and Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
(2018)
Singing for Lung Health: evaluation of the British Lung Foundation programme.
European Respiratory Journal, 52 (Suppl. 62), [PA1454].
(doi:10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1454).
Record type:
Meeting abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Singing for Lung Health (SLH) is a novel intervention for people with respiratory disease, including physical and vocal warm ups, rhythm and pitch games, repertoire and cool down/relaxation exercises. Groups are run by leaders who have received quality assured British Lung Foundation (BLF) training (Lewis A. et al, bmjresp 2017; 000216). Qualitative results suggest benefits to physical, mental and emotional health. Limited data also suggest objective improvements in measures of quality of life with SLH are achievable (Lewis A. et al, npjpcrm 2016;80). It is not known how effective the SLH groups supported by the BLF in the UK are.
Aims and objectives: to understand the clinical impact SLH has on people with respiratory disease.
Methods: the BLF conducted a questionnaire survey of 228 singers with respiratory disease from its SLH groups in 2016-2017. Questionnaires were administered prior to participants’ first session and after 12 weeks of singing.
Results: 113 (49.5%) of participants provided 12 week data. There were significant improvements in CAT score (Mean -1.4 CI: (0.25 - -2.48) (p = 0.017). Furthermore, 45% of singers reported reduced GP visits (p = 0.00002) and 18% reported reduced hospital admissions (p = 0.01). However, there were no significant improvements in general quality of life, anxiety, patient activation, breathlessness or inhaler use.
Conclusion: this evaluation found that participants in SLH groups report improvement in respiratory health-related quality of life and a reduction in healthcare utilisation. SLH has potential economic and health benefits. Therefore, to confirm these findings these endpoints should be evaluated further in large scale randomised controlled trials.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 November 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 488938
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/488938
ISSN: 0903-1936
PURE UUID: bea30d49-9e5e-4ff7-9d68-be5933bac0f3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Apr 2024 17:07
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 02:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Adam Lewis
Author:
Phoene Cave
Author:
Nicholas S. Hopkinson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics