The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey

Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey
Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey

BACKGROUND: National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission. METHODS: In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4). RESULTS: Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored. CONCLUSION: The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Genomics, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
0022-2593
305-312
Allen, Sophie
82cd9eb2-886d-4323-94d1-2cfd3f94792d
Loong, Lucy
a8745718-75a4-49a5-beac-ff8de8c2e854
Garrett, Alice
d8fcdea3-8231-4d5e-8ada-4f932ca1a0c3
Torr, Bethany
9c90bac1-5d8a-4f91-81a1-6429ddc5f037
Durkie, Miranda
7caca497-e12f-4f13-99e0-f40e767f0163
Drummond, James
a62b6d9c-7dd6-466d-a690-e9a61a7577bf
Callaway, Alison
1ba2c719-a83b-4996-8d50-172de6356908
Robinson, Rachel
b81f9f32-b468-451d-959b-355aa680f7fb
Burghel, George J.
0288eca6-9ca5-4806-bfeb-2f963643d326
Hanson, Helen
c2c514c2-de84-4a31-80ec-6b03a67db570
Field, Joanne
890721c2-2df0-45c5-bab5-ec3d60dd9bfa
McDevitt, Trudi
d0baf221-c79c-49f1-9864-868fbcd583bb
McVeigh, Terri P.
315c9c27-9756-4740-bced-b06bc774163c
Bedenham, Tina
d10ae891-8e08-4b4f-a08c-7216ea73a413
Bowles, Christopher
83f97beb-61b1-4760-9f55-f48ab111c8fc
Bradshaw, Kirsty
3e19b015-dfe9-4165-b67e-7dc8b241a1b7
Brooks, Claire
cd72baba-3e19-4469-ba0b-d69cb9500320
Butler, Samantha
9340104f-7ea7-4991-892e-f2020f08171d
Del Rey Jimenez, Juan Carlos
a131bb04-1eb7-4eb2-9559-00a841cdd207
Hawkes, Lorraine
89833a63-b663-41d1-83b9-8a7c922bf53d
Stinton, Victoria
2bfa74eb-e7ab-465f-8239-6b586e809f7f
MacMahon, Suzanne
fe4d1721-e1c3-40b5-8259-0ff04ec60bc1
Owens, Martina
5a5ffb79-ba02-4048-8a21-cb793ea06ffc
Palmer-Smith, Sheila
c1224d8f-13f0-4f41-898d-a110f7088f7e
Smith, Kenneth
4bc77c16-88fb-450c-8c11-a1485339c08d
Tellez, James
8baac062-ab46-45cf-9cd7-751218c695e7
Valganon-Petrizan, Mikel
74c2e89e-62e1-47d3-883d-f0aa21458ba0
Waskiewicz, Erik
bffeff7d-98ea-4d17-963b-e6e8f7f1a9a4
Yau, Michael
43b66d12-7b66-4d8e-af8d-88482586b528
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Tischkowitz, Marc
1e7750c2-91a5-4079-a1f0-f59a1f42405b
Goel, Shilpi
377ff81b-b9cd-4c78-9a70-fd545c85ee2c
McRonald, Fiona
32226b69-dfbd-4763-aa33-441c6dd57774
Antoniou, Antonis C.
b5275276-df7e-42a4-9a38-6a9516924f0d
Morris, Eva
1e0036c5-7e50-4b2f-a924-ba99241c3a39
Hardy, Steven
eb61e4d0-0dda-4692-af3d-df105851d673
Turnbull, Clare
63408861-754b-4f55-a010-29d1bea914e2
Allen, Sophie
82cd9eb2-886d-4323-94d1-2cfd3f94792d
Loong, Lucy
a8745718-75a4-49a5-beac-ff8de8c2e854
Garrett, Alice
d8fcdea3-8231-4d5e-8ada-4f932ca1a0c3
Torr, Bethany
9c90bac1-5d8a-4f91-81a1-6429ddc5f037
Durkie, Miranda
7caca497-e12f-4f13-99e0-f40e767f0163
Drummond, James
a62b6d9c-7dd6-466d-a690-e9a61a7577bf
Callaway, Alison
1ba2c719-a83b-4996-8d50-172de6356908
Robinson, Rachel
b81f9f32-b468-451d-959b-355aa680f7fb
Burghel, George J.
0288eca6-9ca5-4806-bfeb-2f963643d326
Hanson, Helen
c2c514c2-de84-4a31-80ec-6b03a67db570
Field, Joanne
890721c2-2df0-45c5-bab5-ec3d60dd9bfa
McDevitt, Trudi
d0baf221-c79c-49f1-9864-868fbcd583bb
McVeigh, Terri P.
315c9c27-9756-4740-bced-b06bc774163c
Bedenham, Tina
d10ae891-8e08-4b4f-a08c-7216ea73a413
Bowles, Christopher
83f97beb-61b1-4760-9f55-f48ab111c8fc
Bradshaw, Kirsty
3e19b015-dfe9-4165-b67e-7dc8b241a1b7
Brooks, Claire
cd72baba-3e19-4469-ba0b-d69cb9500320
Butler, Samantha
9340104f-7ea7-4991-892e-f2020f08171d
Del Rey Jimenez, Juan Carlos
a131bb04-1eb7-4eb2-9559-00a841cdd207
Hawkes, Lorraine
89833a63-b663-41d1-83b9-8a7c922bf53d
Stinton, Victoria
2bfa74eb-e7ab-465f-8239-6b586e809f7f
MacMahon, Suzanne
fe4d1721-e1c3-40b5-8259-0ff04ec60bc1
Owens, Martina
5a5ffb79-ba02-4048-8a21-cb793ea06ffc
Palmer-Smith, Sheila
c1224d8f-13f0-4f41-898d-a110f7088f7e
Smith, Kenneth
4bc77c16-88fb-450c-8c11-a1485339c08d
Tellez, James
8baac062-ab46-45cf-9cd7-751218c695e7
Valganon-Petrizan, Mikel
74c2e89e-62e1-47d3-883d-f0aa21458ba0
Waskiewicz, Erik
bffeff7d-98ea-4d17-963b-e6e8f7f1a9a4
Yau, Michael
43b66d12-7b66-4d8e-af8d-88482586b528
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Tischkowitz, Marc
1e7750c2-91a5-4079-a1f0-f59a1f42405b
Goel, Shilpi
377ff81b-b9cd-4c78-9a70-fd545c85ee2c
McRonald, Fiona
32226b69-dfbd-4763-aa33-441c6dd57774
Antoniou, Antonis C.
b5275276-df7e-42a4-9a38-6a9516924f0d
Morris, Eva
1e0036c5-7e50-4b2f-a924-ba99241c3a39
Hardy, Steven
eb61e4d0-0dda-4692-af3d-df105851d673
Turnbull, Clare
63408861-754b-4f55-a010-29d1bea914e2

Allen, Sophie, Loong, Lucy, Garrett, Alice, Torr, Bethany, Durkie, Miranda, Drummond, James, Callaway, Alison, Robinson, Rachel, Burghel, George J., Hanson, Helen, Field, Joanne, McDevitt, Trudi, McVeigh, Terri P., Bedenham, Tina, Bowles, Christopher, Bradshaw, Kirsty, Brooks, Claire, Butler, Samantha, Del Rey Jimenez, Juan Carlos, Hawkes, Lorraine, Stinton, Victoria, MacMahon, Suzanne, Owens, Martina, Palmer-Smith, Sheila, Smith, Kenneth, Tellez, James, Valganon-Petrizan, Mikel, Waskiewicz, Erik, Yau, Michael, Eccles, Diana M., Tischkowitz, Marc, Goel, Shilpi, McRonald, Fiona, Antoniou, Antonis C., Morris, Eva, Hardy, Steven and Turnbull, Clare (2024) Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey. Journal of Medical Genetics, 61 (4), 305-312. (doi:10.1136/jmg-2023-109645).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission. METHODS: In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4). RESULTS: Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored. CONCLUSION: The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.

Text
305.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (673kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 October 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 December 2023
Published date: 21 March 2024
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Keywords: Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Genomics, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489031
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489031
ISSN: 0022-2593
PURE UUID: 48c6f7e5-19da-4b88-864f-da3556813a8f
ORCID for Diana M. Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2024 16:45
Last modified: 14 May 2024 01:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sophie Allen
Author: Lucy Loong
Author: Alice Garrett
Author: Bethany Torr
Author: Miranda Durkie
Author: James Drummond
Author: Alison Callaway
Author: Rachel Robinson
Author: George J. Burghel
Author: Helen Hanson
Author: Joanne Field
Author: Trudi McDevitt
Author: Terri P. McVeigh
Author: Tina Bedenham
Author: Christopher Bowles
Author: Kirsty Bradshaw
Author: Claire Brooks
Author: Samantha Butler
Author: Juan Carlos Del Rey Jimenez
Author: Lorraine Hawkes
Author: Victoria Stinton
Author: Suzanne MacMahon
Author: Martina Owens
Author: Sheila Palmer-Smith
Author: Kenneth Smith
Author: James Tellez
Author: Mikel Valganon-Petrizan
Author: Erik Waskiewicz
Author: Michael Yau
Author: Diana M. Eccles ORCID iD
Author: Marc Tischkowitz
Author: Shilpi Goel
Author: Fiona McRonald
Author: Antonis C. Antoniou
Author: Eva Morris
Author: Steven Hardy
Author: Clare Turnbull

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×