The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching

Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching
Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching
Modern medical curricula adopt the use self-directed learning approaches, which frequently include the use of technology enhanced learning resources. Often, students prefer those which are available via mobile devices because it can facilitate flexibility and autonomy with their learning, more so than with traditional modalities. Although the production value of resources may be appealing to users, those that work most effectively for education align well to existing pedagogies. One such pedagogy is the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. It is a framework that can be used to facilitate the construction of educational video, that can benefit learning gain through reducing the cognitive load.

Although much research has been conducted on how information should be presented in video resources, there is very limited evidence within the subject of clinical anatomy and physiology or when applying different types of educational video, such as screencasts, or interactive video. In the field of anatomy education recent approaches have sought to standardize a robust methodology to evaluate digital resources. This procedure utilizes a combination of normalized learning gain and learner perceptions to gain an accurate picture of educational impact.

The current study investigated the impact of both interactive educational videos and screencasts compared with traditional teaching techniques in the challenging subjects of histology and pain physiology. A quasi-randomized, cross-sectional study was conducted with 135 medical students enrolled at the University of Southampton. Sixty fourth- and fifth-year students assessed the histology resources, and 75 second-year students assessed the pain histology resources. Participants were randomly assigned to either a text-based resource, interactive video, or screencast group. Outcomes measured were:

1. Normalized knowledge gain (and retention) assessed using one-best-answer multiple choice question tests

2. Student perceptions using 1–10 Likert-scale style questionnaires.

A significant improvement in mean normalized knowledge gain was observed for all teaching modalities. For pain physiology, the means were: Text—49.0% (n = 23), interactive video—70.1% (n = 26), and screencast—53.8% (n = 26). For all learning gains, P < 0.001. For histology, there was a mean normalized learning gain for text—80.0% (n = 20), interactive video—74.4% (n = 20), and screencast groups—68.3% (n = 20). For all learning gains, P < 0.001.

For pain physiology resources, interactive videos significantly improved learning gain compared to the screencast (P < 0.05) and the text resource groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between those who used the text or screencast resources. There was also no significant difference in knowledge retention between the different teaching methods for each subject.

Following teaching, all three teaching modalities had similar effects on student confidence in the subjects, desire for educational channels dedicated to each topic, and preference for locally produced vs. externally produced videos. These findings have the potential to inform educators on which types of resources to create or to select for their students to have the best impact on learning.
0065-2598
319-343
Springer Cham
Robson, Alistair
5213317b-8c8a-4ca1-9799-d988d3c04fb5
Scantling-Birch, Yarrow
99bd2d51-4137-4957-a238-f0d8c81e2a55
Morton, Stuart
7545cf7d-15a6-43cc-9949-41ece1749fef
Anbu, Deepika
e76b1525-6e46-4f52-9c7f-eedf449d9dbf
Border, Scott
67fce2e0-d2cd-43a2-a9cc-e6cb6fd28544
Rea, Paul M.
Robson, Alistair
5213317b-8c8a-4ca1-9799-d988d3c04fb5
Scantling-Birch, Yarrow
99bd2d51-4137-4957-a238-f0d8c81e2a55
Morton, Stuart
7545cf7d-15a6-43cc-9949-41ece1749fef
Anbu, Deepika
e76b1525-6e46-4f52-9c7f-eedf449d9dbf
Border, Scott
67fce2e0-d2cd-43a2-a9cc-e6cb6fd28544
Rea, Paul M.

Robson, Alistair, Scantling-Birch, Yarrow, Morton, Stuart, Anbu, Deepika and Border, Scott (2022) Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching. In, Rea, Paul M. (ed.) Biomedical Visualisation: Volume 11. (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1356) Springer Cham, pp. 319-343. (doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87779-8_14).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Modern medical curricula adopt the use self-directed learning approaches, which frequently include the use of technology enhanced learning resources. Often, students prefer those which are available via mobile devices because it can facilitate flexibility and autonomy with their learning, more so than with traditional modalities. Although the production value of resources may be appealing to users, those that work most effectively for education align well to existing pedagogies. One such pedagogy is the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. It is a framework that can be used to facilitate the construction of educational video, that can benefit learning gain through reducing the cognitive load.

Although much research has been conducted on how information should be presented in video resources, there is very limited evidence within the subject of clinical anatomy and physiology or when applying different types of educational video, such as screencasts, or interactive video. In the field of anatomy education recent approaches have sought to standardize a robust methodology to evaluate digital resources. This procedure utilizes a combination of normalized learning gain and learner perceptions to gain an accurate picture of educational impact.

The current study investigated the impact of both interactive educational videos and screencasts compared with traditional teaching techniques in the challenging subjects of histology and pain physiology. A quasi-randomized, cross-sectional study was conducted with 135 medical students enrolled at the University of Southampton. Sixty fourth- and fifth-year students assessed the histology resources, and 75 second-year students assessed the pain histology resources. Participants were randomly assigned to either a text-based resource, interactive video, or screencast group. Outcomes measured were:

1. Normalized knowledge gain (and retention) assessed using one-best-answer multiple choice question tests

2. Student perceptions using 1–10 Likert-scale style questionnaires.

A significant improvement in mean normalized knowledge gain was observed for all teaching modalities. For pain physiology, the means were: Text—49.0% (n = 23), interactive video—70.1% (n = 26), and screencast—53.8% (n = 26). For all learning gains, P < 0.001. For histology, there was a mean normalized learning gain for text—80.0% (n = 20), interactive video—74.4% (n = 20), and screencast groups—68.3% (n = 20). For all learning gains, P < 0.001.

For pain physiology resources, interactive videos significantly improved learning gain compared to the screencast (P < 0.05) and the text resource groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between those who used the text or screencast resources. There was also no significant difference in knowledge retention between the different teaching methods for each subject.

Following teaching, all three teaching modalities had similar effects on student confidence in the subjects, desire for educational channels dedicated to each topic, and preference for locally produced vs. externally produced videos. These findings have the potential to inform educators on which types of resources to create or to select for their students to have the best impact on learning.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 11 February 2022
Published date: 12 February 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489104
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489104
ISSN: 0065-2598
PURE UUID: 53f9a96e-de50-457d-9df1-6465ab2f6e1b
ORCID for Stuart Morton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-4869

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2024 16:33
Last modified: 16 Apr 2024 01:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alistair Robson
Author: Yarrow Scantling-Birch
Author: Stuart Morton ORCID iD
Author: Deepika Anbu
Author: Scott Border
Editor: Paul M. Rea

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×