When Aristotelian virtuous agents acquire the fine for themselves, what are they acquiring?
When Aristotelian virtuous agents acquire the fine for themselves, what are they acquiring?
In the Nicomachean Ethics, one of Aristotle’s most frequent characterizations of the virtuous agent is that she acts for the sake of the fine (to kalon). In IX.8, this pursuit of the fine receives a more specific description; virtuous agents maximally assign the fine to themselves. In this paper, I answer the question of how we are to understand the fine as individually and maximally acquirable. I analyze Nicomachean Ethics IX.7, where Aristotle highlights virtuous activity (energeia) as central to the fine, and argue that when virtuous agents pursue the fine, what they are pursuing is virtuous activity. I then address various problems, like how virtuous people can maximize virtuous activity yet sacrifice their lives, which would seem to amount to sacrificing future opportunities to virtuous activity and therefore not maximizing it. I also eliminate alternative interpretations that do not take virtuous activity as necessary to the fine, for example the common good interpretation, whereby virtuous agents pursuing the fine amounts to their pursuing the common good.
674-692
Kim, Bradford Jean-Hyuk
70cbecb5-ac2b-4a4a-946e-1ef9bf68c81c
Kim, Bradford Jean-Hyuk
70cbecb5-ac2b-4a4a-946e-1ef9bf68c81c
Kim, Bradford Jean-Hyuk
(2019)
When Aristotelian virtuous agents acquire the fine for themselves, what are they acquiring?
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28 (4), .
(doi:10.1080/09608788.2019.1668350).
Abstract
In the Nicomachean Ethics, one of Aristotle’s most frequent characterizations of the virtuous agent is that she acts for the sake of the fine (to kalon). In IX.8, this pursuit of the fine receives a more specific description; virtuous agents maximally assign the fine to themselves. In this paper, I answer the question of how we are to understand the fine as individually and maximally acquirable. I analyze Nicomachean Ethics IX.7, where Aristotle highlights virtuous activity (energeia) as central to the fine, and argue that when virtuous agents pursue the fine, what they are pursuing is virtuous activity. I then address various problems, like how virtuous people can maximize virtuous activity yet sacrifice their lives, which would seem to amount to sacrificing future opportunities to virtuous activity and therefore not maximizing it. I also eliminate alternative interpretations that do not take virtuous activity as necessary to the fine, for example the common good interpretation, whereby virtuous agents pursuing the fine amounts to their pursuing the common good.
Text
bjhp1
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 September 2019
e-pub ahead of print date: 14 October 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489189
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489189
ISSN: 0960-8788
PURE UUID: 901de7f5-acb6-4c4b-b716-5fba92b7c149
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Apr 2024 16:30
Last modified: 24 Apr 2024 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Bradford Jean-Hyuk Kim
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics