The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi study

Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi study
Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi study
Objectives: to develop a core outcome set (COS) to capture and measure the well-being of doctors working in the NHS.

Design: an online Delphi study.

Setting: United Kingdom National Health Service.

Participants: participants from four stakeholder groups: i) those who might use the COS in research, ii) organisations that measure/capture NHS staff wellbeing, iii) professionals with experience managing NHS staff wellbeing, and iv) NHS doctors, were identified through authorship of relevant publications, attendee lists of doctor well-being conferences and meetings, professional bodies, participation in a previous study and recommendations from others. They were recruited via email.

Method: a two-stage process: 1) creating a list of 43 wellbeing outcomes informed by a systematic review of wellbeing measurement instruments, a survey of UK doctors and 2 doctor engagement workshops, and 2) an online modified Delphi study (with two rounds) to reach consensus. Outcomes were rated on a 9-point Likert scale; consensus was reached when ≤75% agreed that an outcome was critical for inclusion in the COS.

Results: fifty-two participants completed both Delphi rounds. Seven wellbeing outcomes met the threshold for inclusion in the COS: General wellbeing, Health, Personal safety, Job satisfaction, Morale, Life work balance, and Good clinical practice.

Conclusion: use of the COS has the potential to reduce heterogeneity and standardise the capture and measurement of doctor well-being and ensure outcomes important to all stakeholders are reported.

Trial registration: this study was prospectively registered with the COMET initiative www.comet-initiative.org (Registration: 1577)
medRxiv
Simons, Gemma
fd1eb2bd-23d4-42a8-899b-5eeb5ad62b9c
Klepacz, Naomi
31061121-a4ac-4a6b-a110-bcc6afd554fd
Baldwin, David S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Simons, Gemma
fd1eb2bd-23d4-42a8-899b-5eeb5ad62b9c
Klepacz, Naomi
31061121-a4ac-4a6b-a110-bcc6afd554fd
Baldwin, David S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Objectives: to develop a core outcome set (COS) to capture and measure the well-being of doctors working in the NHS.

Design: an online Delphi study.

Setting: United Kingdom National Health Service.

Participants: participants from four stakeholder groups: i) those who might use the COS in research, ii) organisations that measure/capture NHS staff wellbeing, iii) professionals with experience managing NHS staff wellbeing, and iv) NHS doctors, were identified through authorship of relevant publications, attendee lists of doctor well-being conferences and meetings, professional bodies, participation in a previous study and recommendations from others. They were recruited via email.

Method: a two-stage process: 1) creating a list of 43 wellbeing outcomes informed by a systematic review of wellbeing measurement instruments, a survey of UK doctors and 2 doctor engagement workshops, and 2) an online modified Delphi study (with two rounds) to reach consensus. Outcomes were rated on a 9-point Likert scale; consensus was reached when ≤75% agreed that an outcome was critical for inclusion in the COS.

Results: fifty-two participants completed both Delphi rounds. Seven wellbeing outcomes met the threshold for inclusion in the COS: General wellbeing, Health, Personal safety, Job satisfaction, Morale, Life work balance, and Good clinical practice.

Conclusion: use of the COS has the potential to reduce heterogeneity and standardise the capture and measurement of doctor well-being and ensure outcomes important to all stakeholders are reported.

Trial registration: this study was prospectively registered with the COMET initiative www.comet-initiative.org (Registration: 1577)

Text
2024.04.11.24305668v1.full - Author's Original
Download (410kB)

More information

Published date: 12 April 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489283
PURE UUID: c32ca460-dbc6-4476-a892-cdcab12c22f5
ORCID for Gemma Simons: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-5948
ORCID for Naomi Klepacz: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-8000
ORCID for David S. Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2024 16:33
Last modified: 20 Apr 2024 02:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gemma Simons ORCID iD
Author: Naomi Klepacz ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×