The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Concept of adaptive capacity in climate action discussions: A critical evaluation

Concept of adaptive capacity in climate action discussions: A critical evaluation
Concept of adaptive capacity in climate action discussions: A critical evaluation
Social scientists addressing the climate crisis, and specifically action to mitigate impacts and adaptation at community levels, have focused on adaptive capacity - conditions that enable people to anticipate and respond to change, and recover from and minimise the consequences of change (Adger and Vincent 2005). In this agentic approach, scholars agree that social capital plays a role in building adaptive capacity. Recently scholars have translated abstract discussions of social capital to identify five social dimensions that can contribute to community-level adaptive capacity. This certainly offers policymakers and practitioners a useful ‘toolkit’ for identifying obstacles and opportunities for building capacities to adapt and innovate in the face of climate change. However, there is inadequate consideration of politics and power relations. Here I draw on my own research and wider debates in sociology to offer a critical evaluation of a focus on adaptive capacity at 3 levels: a) scholarship has identified gender differentiation in access to social capital, but I argue for an intersectional perspective in understanding access as well as ability to mobilise resources and networks or indeed create new ones; b) A focus on building adaptive capacity constructs a neo-liberal frame, shifting responsibility for adaptation to communities and affirming the stability of existing socio-economic-political-bio frames of development and growth; c) relatedly, if we are to take decolonisation seriously, we have to acknowledge that prioritising community resilience upholds Western concepts of agency and adaptive capacity. Different epistemologies of sustainability and human well-being can lead to transformation rather than just adaptation.
Climate action, Adaptive capacity, Social capital, Critical appraisal
Shah, Bindi
c5c7510a-3b3d-4d12-a02a-c98e09734166
Shah, Bindi
c5c7510a-3b3d-4d12-a02a-c98e09734166

Shah, Bindi (2024) Concept of adaptive capacity in climate action discussions: A critical evaluation. BSA Virtual Annual Conference 2024: Crisis, Continuity and Change, Virtual. 03 - 05 Apr 2024.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Social scientists addressing the climate crisis, and specifically action to mitigate impacts and adaptation at community levels, have focused on adaptive capacity - conditions that enable people to anticipate and respond to change, and recover from and minimise the consequences of change (Adger and Vincent 2005). In this agentic approach, scholars agree that social capital plays a role in building adaptive capacity. Recently scholars have translated abstract discussions of social capital to identify five social dimensions that can contribute to community-level adaptive capacity. This certainly offers policymakers and practitioners a useful ‘toolkit’ for identifying obstacles and opportunities for building capacities to adapt and innovate in the face of climate change. However, there is inadequate consideration of politics and power relations. Here I draw on my own research and wider debates in sociology to offer a critical evaluation of a focus on adaptive capacity at 3 levels: a) scholarship has identified gender differentiation in access to social capital, but I argue for an intersectional perspective in understanding access as well as ability to mobilise resources and networks or indeed create new ones; b) A focus on building adaptive capacity constructs a neo-liberal frame, shifting responsibility for adaptation to communities and affirming the stability of existing socio-economic-political-bio frames of development and growth; c) relatedly, if we are to take decolonisation seriously, we have to acknowledge that prioritising community resilience upholds Western concepts of agency and adaptive capacity. Different epistemologies of sustainability and human well-being can lead to transformation rather than just adaptation.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

In preparation date: 2024
Published date: 4 April 2024
Venue - Dates: BSA Virtual Annual Conference 2024: Crisis, Continuity and Change, Virtual, 2024-04-03 - 2024-04-05
Keywords: Climate action, Adaptive capacity, Social capital, Critical appraisal

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489288
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489288
PURE UUID: 757e4e3e-7eb8-4108-9610-feb46eaa8790
ORCID for Bindi Shah: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5571-9755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2024 16:34
Last modified: 20 Apr 2024 01:49

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×