The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

'Too many restrictions could not be thrown in the way of divorce': attitudes to women's petitions for divorce by way of Act of Parliament 1801-1831

'Too many restrictions could not be thrown in the way of divorce': attitudes to women's petitions for divorce by way of Act of Parliament 1801-1831
'Too many restrictions could not be thrown in the way of divorce': attitudes to women's petitions for divorce by way of Act of Parliament 1801-1831
Before the 1857 Matrimonial Causes Act, the only way to dissolve an otherwise valid marriage was to obtain a divorce by way of Act of Parliament. It was, however, a remedy that had evolved purely for the use of men and was only available on the grounds of adultery. In total, only four women successfully ended their marriages this way. These were the cases of Addison in 1801; Turton in 1831; Battersby in 1840 and Hall in 1850. This paper examines the wider context surrounding divorce and adultery at the turn of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and how this impacted (and limited) the few divorce applications brought by women at the time.
Daniell, Alison
b1bb9317-db47-41c8-ad81-ab30fcf14565
Daniell, Alison
b1bb9317-db47-41c8-ad81-ab30fcf14565

Daniell, Alison (2022) 'Too many restrictions could not be thrown in the way of divorce': attitudes to women's petitions for divorce by way of Act of Parliament 1801-1831. Institute of Historical Research: Parliament, Politics and People Seminar, Institute of Historical Research , London, United Kingdom. 21 Jun 2022. 16 pp .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Before the 1857 Matrimonial Causes Act, the only way to dissolve an otherwise valid marriage was to obtain a divorce by way of Act of Parliament. It was, however, a remedy that had evolved purely for the use of men and was only available on the grounds of adultery. In total, only four women successfully ended their marriages this way. These were the cases of Addison in 1801; Turton in 1831; Battersby in 1840 and Hall in 1850. This paper examines the wider context surrounding divorce and adultery at the turn of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and how this impacted (and limited) the few divorce applications brought by women at the time.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 20 June 2022
Venue - Dates: Institute of Historical Research: Parliament, Politics and People Seminar, Institute of Historical Research , London, United Kingdom, 2022-06-21 - 2022-06-21

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489348
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489348
PURE UUID: 0fd8bf0b-d5fe-460b-be37-858f3fadd64c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Apr 2024 16:35
Last modified: 22 Apr 2024 16:35

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alison Daniell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×