The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Background: diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) relies on criteria that are constraining and potentially ambiguous. Some features are open to clinical interpretation and their prevalence unknown. This study investigated the sensitivity of current diagnostic criteria in a large group of patients with bvFTD.

Methods: forty-five patients with clear evidence of bvFTD as judged by progressive clinical decline (>3 years) with marked frontal features and significant frontal brain atrophy on brain MRI were included. Thirty-two have died; pathologic confirmation of frontotemporal lobar degeneration was found in all 18 coming to autopsy. We established the prevalence of core and supportive diagnostic features at presentation and with disease progression.

Results: only 25/45 patients (56%) showed all five core features necessary for a diagnosis of bvFTD at initial presentation and 33/45 (73%) as their disease progressed. Two core features, emotional blunting and loss of insight, were never observed in 25% and 13% of cases. Executive dysfunction, hyperorality, mental inflexibility, and distractibility were the only supportive features present in >50% of cases at initial presentation. Although not a diagnostic feature, impaired activities of daily living was present in 33/45 patients (73%).

Conclusions: strict application of the criteria misses a significant proportion of patients. Many supportive features have low prevalence and are clinically not useful. Revision of the criteria to include level of certainty (definite, probable, possible) dependent on the number of features present and the presence of ancillary information (e.g., brain atrophy, neuropsychological abnormalities, impaired activities of daily living) is encouraged.

ACE = Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination; ADL = activities of daily living; bvFTD = behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.
0028-3878
732-737
Piguet, O.
edb4727c-9766-4217-8010-1fcd83281548
Hornberger, M.
e6680a2e-5d11-4838-998b-cf287f486bd6
Shelley, B.P.
d1811558-a70f-4a06-b450-3a4174f35165
Kipps, C.M.
e43be016-2dc2-45e6-9a02-ab2a0e0208d5
Hodges, J.R.
c17af0a9-82e7-4f5a-8a97-d50ec06bbb0a
Piguet, O.
edb4727c-9766-4217-8010-1fcd83281548
Hornberger, M.
e6680a2e-5d11-4838-998b-cf287f486bd6
Shelley, B.P.
d1811558-a70f-4a06-b450-3a4174f35165
Kipps, C.M.
e43be016-2dc2-45e6-9a02-ab2a0e0208d5
Hodges, J.R.
c17af0a9-82e7-4f5a-8a97-d50ec06bbb0a

Piguet, O., Hornberger, M., Shelley, B.P., Kipps, C.M. and Hodges, J.R. (2009) Sensitivity of current criteria for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 72 (8), 732-737. (doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000343004.98599.45).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) relies on criteria that are constraining and potentially ambiguous. Some features are open to clinical interpretation and their prevalence unknown. This study investigated the sensitivity of current diagnostic criteria in a large group of patients with bvFTD.

Methods: forty-five patients with clear evidence of bvFTD as judged by progressive clinical decline (>3 years) with marked frontal features and significant frontal brain atrophy on brain MRI were included. Thirty-two have died; pathologic confirmation of frontotemporal lobar degeneration was found in all 18 coming to autopsy. We established the prevalence of core and supportive diagnostic features at presentation and with disease progression.

Results: only 25/45 patients (56%) showed all five core features necessary for a diagnosis of bvFTD at initial presentation and 33/45 (73%) as their disease progressed. Two core features, emotional blunting and loss of insight, were never observed in 25% and 13% of cases. Executive dysfunction, hyperorality, mental inflexibility, and distractibility were the only supportive features present in >50% of cases at initial presentation. Although not a diagnostic feature, impaired activities of daily living was present in 33/45 patients (73%).

Conclusions: strict application of the criteria misses a significant proportion of patients. Many supportive features have low prevalence and are clinically not useful. Revision of the criteria to include level of certainty (definite, probable, possible) dependent on the number of features present and the presence of ancillary information (e.g., brain atrophy, neuropsychological abnormalities, impaired activities of daily living) is encouraged.

ACE = Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination; ADL = activities of daily living; bvFTD = behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 23 February 2009
Published date: 24 February 2009

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489384
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489384
ISSN: 0028-3878
PURE UUID: cc679f7a-5a88-4bb1-bdee-b902b15895cf
ORCID for C.M. Kipps: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5205-9712

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2024 16:33
Last modified: 24 Apr 2024 01:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: O. Piguet
Author: M. Hornberger
Author: B.P. Shelley
Author: C.M. Kipps ORCID iD
Author: J.R. Hodges

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×