Can progressive and non-progressive behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia be distinguished at presentation?
Can progressive and non-progressive behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia be distinguished at presentation?
Background: recent findings suggest that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) differ in their disease progression (progressive vs non-progressive patients). The current study investigates whether the two groups can be discriminated by their clinical features at first presentation.
Methods: archival clinical data of the Early Onset Dementia Clinic, Cambridge, UK, were analysed for 71 patients with bv-FTD: 45 progressive and 26 non-progressive cases with more than 3 years of follow-up.
Results: the subgroups were largely indistinguishable on the basis of the presenting clinical features but could be distinguished on general cognitive (Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-revised) and selected supportive diagnostic features (distractibility, stereotypic speech, impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) and current depression).
Conclusions: progressive and non-progressive patients are difficult to differentiate on the basis of current clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD but a combination of general cognitive, executive dysfunction and impaired ADL measures appear to be the most promising discriminators.
591-593
Hornberger, M.
e6680a2e-5d11-4838-998b-cf287f486bd6
Shelley, B.P.
d1811558-a70f-4a06-b450-3a4174f35165
Kipps, C.M.
e43be016-2dc2-45e6-9a02-ab2a0e0208d5
Piguet, O.
edb4727c-9766-4217-8010-1fcd83281548
Hodges, J.R.
c17af0a9-82e7-4f5a-8a97-d50ec06bbb0a
13 April 2009
Hornberger, M.
e6680a2e-5d11-4838-998b-cf287f486bd6
Shelley, B.P.
d1811558-a70f-4a06-b450-3a4174f35165
Kipps, C.M.
e43be016-2dc2-45e6-9a02-ab2a0e0208d5
Piguet, O.
edb4727c-9766-4217-8010-1fcd83281548
Hodges, J.R.
c17af0a9-82e7-4f5a-8a97-d50ec06bbb0a
Hornberger, M., Shelley, B.P., Kipps, C.M., Piguet, O. and Hodges, J.R.
(2009)
Can progressive and non-progressive behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia be distinguished at presentation?
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 80, .
(doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.163873).
Abstract
Background: recent findings suggest that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) differ in their disease progression (progressive vs non-progressive patients). The current study investigates whether the two groups can be discriminated by their clinical features at first presentation.
Methods: archival clinical data of the Early Onset Dementia Clinic, Cambridge, UK, were analysed for 71 patients with bv-FTD: 45 progressive and 26 non-progressive cases with more than 3 years of follow-up.
Results: the subgroups were largely indistinguishable on the basis of the presenting clinical features but could be distinguished on general cognitive (Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-revised) and selected supportive diagnostic features (distractibility, stereotypic speech, impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) and current depression).
Conclusions: progressive and non-progressive patients are difficult to differentiate on the basis of current clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD but a combination of general cognitive, executive dysfunction and impaired ADL measures appear to be the most promising discriminators.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 January 2009
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 February 2009
Published date: 13 April 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489386
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489386
ISSN: 0022-3050
PURE UUID: 5c3d07cd-3758-4f1f-9694-cd4cf04dcb68
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Apr 2024 16:33
Last modified: 24 Apr 2024 01:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M. Hornberger
Author:
B.P. Shelley
Author:
C.M. Kipps
Author:
O. Piguet
Author:
J.R. Hodges
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics