Computer recording of standard test of visual neglect in stroke patients
Computer recording of standard test of visual neglect in stroke patients
Objective: to determine whether a computer-based method for recording standardized assessment of neglect identifies abnormalities in the ?process? as well as in the ?outcome? of such tasks.
Design: prospective sequential assessment of patients admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit.
Subjects: all consecutive patients with right-sided cerebrovascular accident confirmed on computerized tomography (CT) scan including 30 patients with neglect, 57 patients without neglect. An age-matched control group of 13 subjects.
Intervention: all patients were tested using the standard Rivermead Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) and by computer recording of two standard tests for assessing neglect (line bisection and Albert's test). Age-matched controls were tested using computer recording of the two standard tests. Main outcome measures: Neglect was defined using the BIT with a cut-off score of 129. Computer recording measured the ?outcome? of tasks, i.e. the deviation from midline and omissions in cancellation, as well as the ?process? of tasks, i.e. time between cancellations, components of cancellation time including premovement, movement and drawing time, and the starting point for cancellation.
Results: the computer recording identified significant differences in ?outcome? and ?process? which distinguished neglect from non-neglect patients. There were significant differences between non-neglect patients and age-matched controls with regard to ?process? measures but not with regard to ?outcome? measures.
Conclusions: computer recording of standard tests for assessing neglect identifies novel impairments with regard to the process of carrying out tasks. These impairments may be used to investigate changes in neglect with time, the response of neglect to treatment and to explore further the neuropsychological changes associated with neglect in stroke patients.
441-446
Potter, Jonathan
9f0adcdb-fe43-4c3b-b087-cd0d7ca687fc
Deighton, Tony
58bd2fd4-49b6-4560-b020-52f107bcd902
Patel, Mahool
0f932109-20e3-4570-9ddb-f9cb0def0c28
Fairhurst, Michael
6a82d154-93fe-4657-bcee-934d5c888192
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Donnelly, Nick
3f974c49-b11c-411c-bb42-e6e12448a74c
1 April 2000
Potter, Jonathan
9f0adcdb-fe43-4c3b-b087-cd0d7ca687fc
Deighton, Tony
58bd2fd4-49b6-4560-b020-52f107bcd902
Patel, Mahool
0f932109-20e3-4570-9ddb-f9cb0def0c28
Fairhurst, Michael
6a82d154-93fe-4657-bcee-934d5c888192
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Donnelly, Nick
3f974c49-b11c-411c-bb42-e6e12448a74c
Potter, Jonathan, Deighton, Tony, Patel, Mahool, Fairhurst, Michael, Guest, Richard and Donnelly, Nick
(2000)
Computer recording of standard test of visual neglect in stroke patients.
Clinical Rehabilitation, 14 (4), .
(doi:10.1191/0269215500cr344oa).
Abstract
Objective: to determine whether a computer-based method for recording standardized assessment of neglect identifies abnormalities in the ?process? as well as in the ?outcome? of such tasks.
Design: prospective sequential assessment of patients admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit.
Subjects: all consecutive patients with right-sided cerebrovascular accident confirmed on computerized tomography (CT) scan including 30 patients with neglect, 57 patients without neglect. An age-matched control group of 13 subjects.
Intervention: all patients were tested using the standard Rivermead Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) and by computer recording of two standard tests for assessing neglect (line bisection and Albert's test). Age-matched controls were tested using computer recording of the two standard tests. Main outcome measures: Neglect was defined using the BIT with a cut-off score of 129. Computer recording measured the ?outcome? of tasks, i.e. the deviation from midline and omissions in cancellation, as well as the ?process? of tasks, i.e. time between cancellations, components of cancellation time including premovement, movement and drawing time, and the starting point for cancellation.
Results: the computer recording identified significant differences in ?outcome? and ?process? which distinguished neglect from non-neglect patients. There were significant differences between non-neglect patients and age-matched controls with regard to ?process? measures but not with regard to ?outcome? measures.
Conclusions: computer recording of standard tests for assessing neglect identifies novel impairments with regard to the process of carrying out tasks. These impairments may be used to investigate changes in neglect with time, the response of neglect to treatment and to explore further the neuropsychological changes associated with neglect in stroke patients.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 April 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489422
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489422
PURE UUID: 57e79c8e-ce1b-4532-ad35-c9d025755406
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Apr 2024 16:30
Last modified: 08 Nov 2024 03:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Potter
Author:
Tony Deighton
Author:
Mahool Patel
Author:
Michael Fairhurst
Author:
Richard Guest
Author:
Nick Donnelly
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics