The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An assessment of the usability of biometric signature systems using the human-biometric sensor interaction model

An assessment of the usability of biometric signature systems using the human-biometric sensor interaction model
An assessment of the usability of biometric signature systems using the human-biometric sensor interaction model
Signature biometrics is a widely used form of user authentication. As a behavioural biometric, samples have inherent inconsistencies which must be accounted for within an automated system. Performance deterioration of a tuned biometric software system may be caused by an interaction error with a biometric capture device, however, using conventional error metrics, system and user interaction errors are combined, thereby masking the contribution by each element. In this paper we explore the application of the Human-Biometric Sensor Interaction (HBSI) model to signature as an exemplar of a behavioural biometric. Using observational data collected from a range of subjects, our study shows that usability issues can be identified specific to individual capture device technologies. While most interactions are successful, a range of common interaction errors need to be mitigated by design to reduce overall error rates.
336-347
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Brockly, Michael
cdd4bf94-eb75-4ffa-82db-1736992fc34c
Elliott, Stephen
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Scott, James
38da9dc5-ce87-4dc9-96c9-14af6592c2fb
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Brockly, Michael
cdd4bf94-eb75-4ffa-82db-1736992fc34c
Elliott, Stephen
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Scott, James
38da9dc5-ce87-4dc9-96c9-14af6592c2fb

Guest, Richard, Brockly, Michael, Elliott, Stephen and Scott, James (2016) An assessment of the usability of biometric signature systems using the human-biometric sensor interaction model. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 53 (4), 336-347. (doi:10.1504/IJCAT.2016.076810).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Signature biometrics is a widely used form of user authentication. As a behavioural biometric, samples have inherent inconsistencies which must be accounted for within an automated system. Performance deterioration of a tuned biometric software system may be caused by an interaction error with a biometric capture device, however, using conventional error metrics, system and user interaction errors are combined, thereby masking the contribution by each element. In this paper we explore the application of the Human-Biometric Sensor Interaction (HBSI) model to signature as an exemplar of a behavioural biometric. Using observational data collected from a range of subjects, our study shows that usability issues can be identified specific to individual capture device technologies. While most interactions are successful, a range of common interaction errors need to be mitigated by design to reduce overall error rates.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 5 June 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489467
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489467
PURE UUID: ba0b26c6-177c-4b64-9df8-47195a8020a3
ORCID for Richard Guest: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-7336

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2024 16:30
Last modified: 28 Apr 2024 02:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Guest ORCID iD
Author: Michael Brockly
Author: Stephen Elliott
Author: James Scott

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×