The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Distinguishing emotional distress from mental disorder: a qualitative exploration of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ)

Distinguishing emotional distress from mental disorder: a qualitative exploration of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ)
Distinguishing emotional distress from mental disorder: a qualitative exploration of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ)
Background: primary care clinicians see people experiencing the full range of mental health problems. Determining when symptoms reflect disorder is complex. The four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ) uniquely distinguishes general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders. It may support diagnostic conversations and targeting of treatment.

Aim: we aimed to explore peoples’ experiences of completing the 4DSQ and their perceptions of their resulting score profile across distress, depression, anxiety and physical symptoms.

Design and setting: a qualitative study conducted in the UK with people recruited from primary care and community settings.

Method: participants completed the 4DSQ then took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. They were interviewed about their experience of completing the 4DSQ, their perceptions of their scores across four dimensions, and the perceived utility if used with a clinician. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically.

Results: twenty-four interviews were conducted. Most participants found the 4DSQ easy to complete and reported that scores across the four dimensions aligned well with their symptom experience. Distinct scores for distress, depression and anxiety appeared to support improved self-understanding. Some valued the opportunity to discuss their scores and provide relevant context. Many felt the use of the 4DSQ with clinicians would be helpful and likely to support treatment decisions, although some were concerned about time-limited consultations.

Conclusion: distinguishing general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders aligned well with peoples experience of symptoms. Use of the 4DSQ as part of mental health consultations may support targeting of treatment and personalisation of care.
0960-1643
Geraghty, Adam W.A.
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
Holt, Sian
b6977ce7-16bf-4dde-92f4-18abe85ad093
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
28f3f383-6b7f-492f-9ffa-8422d7239c9c
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Terluin, Berend
275934a5-3d48-42ad-9aef-a4958280b8eb
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Stuart, Beth
599fae3b-d001-4edd-8f49-41a33d2d39a3
Mistry, Manoj
bc988bb0-f509-4d00-9287-3ee9580a173b
Richards, Al
d313534a-ede6-40d2-98da-2794683a174f
Smith, Debs
584fc47a-7e58-4262-9e0e-de42ce31f4bd
Newman, Sonia
7c2a55b7-fe92-48f8-b301-82b53337cf51
Rathod, Shanaya
b4dddbe5-e4aa-4069-bd03-20cd6332639c
Bowers, Hannah
c81d418d-3cd7-4da5-bd09-0eee862bd49f
Marwijk, Harm van
e913163c-ce3e-4485-9ef3-90a612e7d70a
et al.
Geraghty, Adam W.A.
2c6549fe-9868-4806-b65a-21881c1930af
Holt, Sian
b6977ce7-16bf-4dde-92f4-18abe85ad093
Chew-Graham, Carolyn A.
28f3f383-6b7f-492f-9ffa-8422d7239c9c
Santer, Miriam
3ce7e832-31eb-4d27-9876-3a1cd7f381dc
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Kendrick, Tony
c697a72c-c698-469d-8ac2-f00df40583e5
Terluin, Berend
275934a5-3d48-42ad-9aef-a4958280b8eb
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Stuart, Beth
599fae3b-d001-4edd-8f49-41a33d2d39a3
Mistry, Manoj
bc988bb0-f509-4d00-9287-3ee9580a173b
Richards, Al
d313534a-ede6-40d2-98da-2794683a174f
Smith, Debs
584fc47a-7e58-4262-9e0e-de42ce31f4bd
Newman, Sonia
7c2a55b7-fe92-48f8-b301-82b53337cf51
Rathod, Shanaya
b4dddbe5-e4aa-4069-bd03-20cd6332639c
Bowers, Hannah
c81d418d-3cd7-4da5-bd09-0eee862bd49f
Marwijk, Harm van
e913163c-ce3e-4485-9ef3-90a612e7d70a

Geraghty, Adam W.A., Holt, Sian and Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. , et al. (2024) Distinguishing emotional distress from mental disorder: a qualitative exploration of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ). BJGP. (doi:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0574).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: primary care clinicians see people experiencing the full range of mental health problems. Determining when symptoms reflect disorder is complex. The four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ) uniquely distinguishes general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders. It may support diagnostic conversations and targeting of treatment.

Aim: we aimed to explore peoples’ experiences of completing the 4DSQ and their perceptions of their resulting score profile across distress, depression, anxiety and physical symptoms.

Design and setting: a qualitative study conducted in the UK with people recruited from primary care and community settings.

Method: participants completed the 4DSQ then took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. They were interviewed about their experience of completing the 4DSQ, their perceptions of their scores across four dimensions, and the perceived utility if used with a clinician. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data were analysed thematically.

Results: twenty-four interviews were conducted. Most participants found the 4DSQ easy to complete and reported that scores across the four dimensions aligned well with their symptom experience. Distinct scores for distress, depression and anxiety appeared to support improved self-understanding. Some valued the opportunity to discuss their scores and provide relevant context. Many felt the use of the 4DSQ with clinicians would be helpful and likely to support treatment decisions, although some were concerned about time-limited consultations.

Conclusion: distinguishing general distress from depressive and anxiety disorders aligned well with peoples experience of symptoms. Use of the 4DSQ as part of mental health consultations may support targeting of treatment and personalisation of care.

Text
4D-UK-Qualitative accepted manuscript - BJGP - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (124kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 March 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 March 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489477
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489477
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: 55b5ecdf-7486-4056-b50a-9abc73fc2182
ORCID for Adam W.A. Geraghty: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8351
ORCID for Sian Holt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5448-3499
ORCID for Miriam Santer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7264-5260
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509
ORCID for Tony Kendrick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-9381

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2024 16:31
Last modified: 27 Apr 2024 02:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sian Holt ORCID iD
Author: Carolyn A. Chew-Graham
Author: Miriam Santer ORCID iD
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD
Author: Tony Kendrick ORCID iD
Author: Berend Terluin
Author: Paul Little
Author: Beth Stuart
Author: Manoj Mistry
Author: Al Richards
Author: Debs Smith
Author: Sonia Newman
Author: Shanaya Rathod
Author: Hannah Bowers
Author: Harm van Marwijk
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×