The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A scoping review of digital fabrication techniques applied to prosthetics and orthotics: Part 1 of 2—Prosthetics

A scoping review of digital fabrication techniques applied to prosthetics and orthotics: Part 1 of 2—Prosthetics
A scoping review of digital fabrication techniques applied to prosthetics and orthotics: Part 1 of 2—Prosthetics
Background: traditionally, the manufacture of prostheses is time-consuming and labor-intensive. One possible route to improving access and quality of these devices is the digitalizing of the fabrication process, which may reduce the burden of manual labor and bring the potential for automation that could help unblock access to assistive technologies globally.

Objectives: to identify where there are gaps in the literature that are creating barriers to decision-making on either appropriate uptake by clinical teams or on the needed next steps in research that mean these technologies can continue on a pathway to maturity.

Study design: scoping literature review.

Methods: a comprehensive search was completed in the following databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health Archive, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Association for Computing Machinery, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and Engineering Village, resulting in 3487 articles to be screened.

Results: after screening, 130 lower limb prosthetic articles and 117 upper limb prosthetic articles were included in this review. Multiple limitations in the literature were identified, particularly a lack of long-term, larger-scale studies; research into the training requirements for these technologies and the necessary rectification processes; and a high range of variance of production workflows and materials which makes drawing conclusions difficult.

Conclusions: these limitations create a barrier to adequate evidence-based decision-making for clinicians, technology developers, and wider policymakers. Increased collaboration between academia, industry, and clinical teams across more of the pathway to market for new technologies could be a route to addressing these gaps.
0309-3646
574-589
Oldfrey, Ben M.
e37061dc-def8-43b5-adbf-6b463a76a2f7
Ramirez, Dafne Z. Morgado
d0bf74b6-c278-4eb4-bd67-a71d298359d6
Miodownik, Mark
d2e9e982-a9ad-4703-ad80-6dff9cb2728a
Wassall, Matthew
081be32d-0267-463d-bba6-862906f047b1
Ramstrand, Nerrolyn
ecb0a2c3-7a74-4349-acc0-49669e2c088f
Wong, Man S.
cef3fde8-15ce-4fe3-8271-128c84f71fe8
Danemayer, Jamie
eefb4b06-bb46-4681-8c3c-d32b0b7f9fe7
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Kenney, Laurence
67e5d27a-3331-4eeb-85f2-1f85bb103252
Nester, Christopher
33a8ddce-a05d-4bb3-a4fc-c30538afeaef
Lemaire, Edward
1dd8b467-003c-45dc-9f8b-b83d5a45e9b9
Gholizadeh, Hossein
d870afb5-ba9d-4588-9b7b-b4550ae36aa2
Diment, Laura E.
ae7297b9-3a62-4e7c-a52d-49aba51b7608
Donovan-Hall, Margaret K.
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Holloway, Catherine
e8cccb43-6f80-4df5-b369-e9f8c6e30dc4
et al.
Oldfrey, Ben M.
e37061dc-def8-43b5-adbf-6b463a76a2f7
Ramirez, Dafne Z. Morgado
d0bf74b6-c278-4eb4-bd67-a71d298359d6
Miodownik, Mark
d2e9e982-a9ad-4703-ad80-6dff9cb2728a
Wassall, Matthew
081be32d-0267-463d-bba6-862906f047b1
Ramstrand, Nerrolyn
ecb0a2c3-7a74-4349-acc0-49669e2c088f
Wong, Man S.
cef3fde8-15ce-4fe3-8271-128c84f71fe8
Danemayer, Jamie
eefb4b06-bb46-4681-8c3c-d32b0b7f9fe7
Dickinson, Alex
10151972-c1b5-4f7d-bc12-6482b5870cad
Kenney, Laurence
67e5d27a-3331-4eeb-85f2-1f85bb103252
Nester, Christopher
33a8ddce-a05d-4bb3-a4fc-c30538afeaef
Lemaire, Edward
1dd8b467-003c-45dc-9f8b-b83d5a45e9b9
Gholizadeh, Hossein
d870afb5-ba9d-4588-9b7b-b4550ae36aa2
Diment, Laura E.
ae7297b9-3a62-4e7c-a52d-49aba51b7608
Donovan-Hall, Margaret K.
5f138055-2162-4982-846c-5c92411055e0
Holloway, Catherine
e8cccb43-6f80-4df5-b369-e9f8c6e30dc4

Oldfrey, Ben M., Ramirez, Dafne Z. Morgado, Miodownik, Mark and Wong, Man S. , et al. (2024) A scoping review of digital fabrication techniques applied to prosthetics and orthotics: Part 1 of 2—Prosthetics. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 48 (5), 574-589. (doi:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000351).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: traditionally, the manufacture of prostheses is time-consuming and labor-intensive. One possible route to improving access and quality of these devices is the digitalizing of the fabrication process, which may reduce the burden of manual labor and bring the potential for automation that could help unblock access to assistive technologies globally.

Objectives: to identify where there are gaps in the literature that are creating barriers to decision-making on either appropriate uptake by clinical teams or on the needed next steps in research that mean these technologies can continue on a pathway to maturity.

Study design: scoping literature review.

Methods: a comprehensive search was completed in the following databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health Archive, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Association for Computing Machinery, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and Engineering Village, resulting in 3487 articles to be screened.

Results: after screening, 130 lower limb prosthetic articles and 117 upper limb prosthetic articles were included in this review. Multiple limitations in the literature were identified, particularly a lack of long-term, larger-scale studies; research into the training requirements for these technologies and the necessary rectification processes; and a high range of variance of production workflows and materials which makes drawing conclusions difficult.

Conclusions: these limitations create a barrier to adequate evidence-based decision-making for clinicians, technology developers, and wider policymakers. Increased collaboration between academia, industry, and clinical teams across more of the pathway to market for new technologies could be a route to addressing these gaps.

Text
DF Review Paper 1 blinded reviewer response v2 -clean - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
a_scoping_review_of_digital_fabrication_techniques.243 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 February 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 April 2024
Published date: 1 October 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489500
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489500
ISSN: 0309-3646
PURE UUID: 9a8d7dde-9521-497c-bf38-20d1f81b6554
ORCID for Alex Dickinson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9647-1944

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2024 16:35
Last modified: 16 Nov 2024 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ben M. Oldfrey
Author: Dafne Z. Morgado Ramirez
Author: Mark Miodownik
Author: Matthew Wassall
Author: Nerrolyn Ramstrand
Author: Man S. Wong
Author: Jamie Danemayer
Author: Alex Dickinson ORCID iD
Author: Laurence Kenney
Author: Christopher Nester
Author: Edward Lemaire
Author: Hossein Gholizadeh
Author: Laura E. Diment
Author: Catherine Holloway
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×