The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Enhancing static biometric signature verification using speeded-up robust features

Enhancing static biometric signature verification using speeded-up robust features
Enhancing static biometric signature verification using speeded-up robust features
Automatic biometric static signature verification performs a comparison between signature images (or preformed templates) to verify authenticity. Although widely recognised that performance enhancement can be achieved when using dynamic features, which use temporal/ constructional information, alongside static features, this scenario requires the capture of signatures using specialist sample equipment such a tablet device. The vast majority of (legacy) signatures across a range of important domains, including banking, legal and forensic applications, are in a static format. In this paper we use the Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) image registration technique in a novel application to static signature image matching. We use genuine and skilled forgery signatures from the GPDS960 dataset as test data and across a range of enrolment and SURF point distance configurations. The best performance from our method was 11.5 enrolment templates using the lowest 50point distances. This encouraging result is in line with the current state-of-the-art performance.
error analysis, feature extraction, robustness, educational institutions, forgery, standards
213-217
IEEE
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Hurtado, Oscar Miguel
57a8ef90-e39d-4731-a271-0399d7201d34
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Hurtado, Oscar Miguel
57a8ef90-e39d-4731-a271-0399d7201d34

Guest, Richard and Hurtado, Oscar Miguel (2012) Enhancing static biometric signature verification using speeded-up robust features. In, 2012 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST). IEEE, pp. 213-217. (doi:10.1109/CCST.2012.6393561).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Automatic biometric static signature verification performs a comparison between signature images (or preformed templates) to verify authenticity. Although widely recognised that performance enhancement can be achieved when using dynamic features, which use temporal/ constructional information, alongside static features, this scenario requires the capture of signatures using specialist sample equipment such a tablet device. The vast majority of (legacy) signatures across a range of important domains, including banking, legal and forensic applications, are in a static format. In this paper we use the Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) image registration technique in a novel application to static signature image matching. We use genuine and skilled forgery signatures from the GPDS960 dataset as test data and across a range of enrolment and SURF point distance configurations. The best performance from our method was 11.5 enrolment templates using the lowest 50point distances. This encouraging result is in line with the current state-of-the-art performance.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 31 December 2012
Keywords: error analysis, feature extraction, robustness, educational institutions, forgery, standards

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489521
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489521
PURE UUID: 767a2eef-44b5-48e0-920e-c843aa4a6860
ORCID for Richard Guest: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-7336

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2024 17:30
Last modified: 28 Apr 2024 02:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Guest ORCID iD
Author: Oscar Miguel Hurtado

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×