Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges
Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges
The contemporary rapid evolution of doctoral programmes with their emphasis shifting to the development of a skilled, versatile researcher from the production of an erudite thesis, has not been matched by parallel progression in the final examination. Those who supervise and examine doctoral candidates seem only to have custom and practice and their own limited experience to steer their decisions in a fast-changing environment. We raise challenging questions about how assessment could be adapted to maintain the benefits of doctoral diversity while providing transparent evidence to employers and the wider society of the specific valuable skills of successful doctoral candidates.
58-74
Denicolo, Pam
800f9d46-34d2-479b-80ad-bc67e1deb143
Duke, Dawn
994b5be1-39af-4c31-8c95-9209108877e5
Reeves, Julie
41e1aec6-0e3c-47cf-969d-59ec48978de8
15 September 2022
Denicolo, Pam
800f9d46-34d2-479b-80ad-bc67e1deb143
Duke, Dawn
994b5be1-39af-4c31-8c95-9209108877e5
Reeves, Julie
41e1aec6-0e3c-47cf-969d-59ec48978de8
Denicolo, Pam, Duke, Dawn and Reeves, Julie
(2022)
Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges.
In,
Österlind, Marie-Louise, Denicolo, Pamela M. and Apelgren, Britt-Marie
(eds.)
Doctoral Education as if People Matter: Critical Issues for the Future.
(Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching, 24)
Brill, .
(doi:10.1163/9789004529304_005).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The contemporary rapid evolution of doctoral programmes with their emphasis shifting to the development of a skilled, versatile researcher from the production of an erudite thesis, has not been matched by parallel progression in the final examination. Those who supervise and examine doctoral candidates seem only to have custom and practice and their own limited experience to steer their decisions in a fast-changing environment. We raise challenging questions about how assessment could be adapted to maintain the benefits of doctoral diversity while providing transparent evidence to employers and the wider society of the specific valuable skills of successful doctoral candidates.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 September 2022
Published date: 15 September 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489702
ISSN: 2542-8721
PURE UUID: 71bb1971-7524-419e-9c9e-8ed13da24ce9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Apr 2024 16:55
Last modified: 01 May 2024 01:44
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Pam Denicolo
Author:
Dawn Duke
Author:
Julie Reeves
Editor:
Marie-Louise Österlind
Editor:
Pamela M. Denicolo
Editor:
Britt-Marie Apelgren
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics