The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges

Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges
Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges
The contemporary rapid evolution of doctoral programmes with their emphasis shifting to the development of a skilled, versatile researcher from the production of an erudite thesis, has not been matched by parallel progression in the final examination. Those who supervise and examine doctoral candidates seem only to have custom and practice and their own limited experience to steer their decisions in a fast-changing environment. We raise challenging questions about how assessment could be adapted to maintain the benefits of doctoral diversity while providing transparent evidence to employers and the wider society of the specific valuable skills of successful doctoral candidates.
2542-8721
58-74
Brill
Denicolo, Pam
800f9d46-34d2-479b-80ad-bc67e1deb143
Duke, Dawn
994b5be1-39af-4c31-8c95-9209108877e5
Reeves, Julie
41e1aec6-0e3c-47cf-969d-59ec48978de8
Österlind, Marie-Louise
Denicolo, Pamela M.
Apelgren, Britt-Marie
Denicolo, Pam
800f9d46-34d2-479b-80ad-bc67e1deb143
Duke, Dawn
994b5be1-39af-4c31-8c95-9209108877e5
Reeves, Julie
41e1aec6-0e3c-47cf-969d-59ec48978de8
Österlind, Marie-Louise
Denicolo, Pamela M.
Apelgren, Britt-Marie

Denicolo, Pam, Duke, Dawn and Reeves, Julie (2022) Doctoral final examinations: (Ir)relevance to new skills and future challenges. In, Österlind, Marie-Louise, Denicolo, Pamela M. and Apelgren, Britt-Marie (eds.) Doctoral Education as if People Matter: Critical Issues for the Future. (Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching, 24) Brill, pp. 58-74. (doi:10.1163/9789004529304_005).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

The contemporary rapid evolution of doctoral programmes with their emphasis shifting to the development of a skilled, versatile researcher from the production of an erudite thesis, has not been matched by parallel progression in the final examination. Those who supervise and examine doctoral candidates seem only to have custom and practice and their own limited experience to steer their decisions in a fast-changing environment. We raise challenging questions about how assessment could be adapted to maintain the benefits of doctoral diversity while providing transparent evidence to employers and the wider society of the specific valuable skills of successful doctoral candidates.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 12 September 2022
Published date: 15 September 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489702
ISSN: 2542-8721
PURE UUID: 71bb1971-7524-419e-9c9e-8ed13da24ce9
ORCID for Julie Reeves: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2778-6686

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Apr 2024 16:55
Last modified: 01 May 2024 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Pam Denicolo
Author: Dawn Duke
Author: Julie Reeves ORCID iD
Editor: Marie-Louise Österlind
Editor: Pamela M. Denicolo
Editor: Britt-Marie Apelgren

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×