The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring intrawork break taking in doctors before and during the Covid-19 pandemic

Exploring intrawork break taking in doctors before and during the Covid-19 pandemic
Exploring intrawork break taking in doctors before and during the Covid-19 pandemic
Burnout in doctors is a longstanding, prevalent public health issue. The Covid-19 pandemic posed an additional threat to doctors’ wellbeing, particularly for those who began careers at the pandemic onset. Intrawork rest breaks could be a helpful means of improving doctors’ wellbeing. This project explored break taking in UK doctors before and during the pandemic.

Systematic review of literature on the effectiveness of breaks for doctors’ wellbeing and/or job performance found a widespread lack of evidence, in quantity and quality, and identified a need for further exploratory research. A longitudinal mixed methods design sought to fill this evidence gap. Quantitative surveys preceded explanatory follow-up semi-structured interviews in two phases (pre-pandemic and post-pandemic outbreak).

In a pre-pandemic survey of doctors of all grades (N=250), repeated twice during the pandemic with newly-qualified foundation doctors (July/August 2020 N=78; November 2020 N=58), most participants perceived breaks as important to wellbeing but were unable to take breaks daily or weekly. Workload and staffing levels were most commonly cited barriers, and lack of break facilities the least cited barrier. Interventions most likely to facilitate breaks were those that reduced workload and/or granted permission. Interventions most often implemented by NHS trusts (e.g. facility improvements, reminders) were ranked least likely to make a difference.

In pre-pandemic follow-up interviews (N=21) participants described a range of structural, procedural, and individual factors that interact to affect break practices, and interventions that could attenuate these effects. Interviews with doctors of all training grades at the pandemic onset (N=12) and foundation year doctors one year later (N=9) explored factors affecting break practice and work experiences under pandemic conditions, and potential areas for intervention. Compared with pre-pandemic narratives, individuals described having more passive roles, which focused on coping with, rather than changing, the considerable disruption to structures and procedures under pandemic conditions. Integration of findings across studies and chronological phases resulted in a proposed conceptual model of break taking in doctors.
University of Southampton
O'Neill, Aimee Nicole
9b231a96-47b7-488d-90df-4d9ceef2fd98
O'Neill, Aimee Nicole
9b231a96-47b7-488d-90df-4d9ceef2fd98
Sinclair, Julia
be3e54d5-c6da-4950-b0ba-3cb8cdcab13c
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e

O'Neill, Aimee Nicole (2023) Exploring intrawork break taking in doctors before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 271pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Burnout in doctors is a longstanding, prevalent public health issue. The Covid-19 pandemic posed an additional threat to doctors’ wellbeing, particularly for those who began careers at the pandemic onset. Intrawork rest breaks could be a helpful means of improving doctors’ wellbeing. This project explored break taking in UK doctors before and during the pandemic.

Systematic review of literature on the effectiveness of breaks for doctors’ wellbeing and/or job performance found a widespread lack of evidence, in quantity and quality, and identified a need for further exploratory research. A longitudinal mixed methods design sought to fill this evidence gap. Quantitative surveys preceded explanatory follow-up semi-structured interviews in two phases (pre-pandemic and post-pandemic outbreak).

In a pre-pandemic survey of doctors of all grades (N=250), repeated twice during the pandemic with newly-qualified foundation doctors (July/August 2020 N=78; November 2020 N=58), most participants perceived breaks as important to wellbeing but were unable to take breaks daily or weekly. Workload and staffing levels were most commonly cited barriers, and lack of break facilities the least cited barrier. Interventions most likely to facilitate breaks were those that reduced workload and/or granted permission. Interventions most often implemented by NHS trusts (e.g. facility improvements, reminders) were ranked least likely to make a difference.

In pre-pandemic follow-up interviews (N=21) participants described a range of structural, procedural, and individual factors that interact to affect break practices, and interventions that could attenuate these effects. Interviews with doctors of all training grades at the pandemic onset (N=12) and foundation year doctors one year later (N=9) explored factors affecting break practice and work experiences under pandemic conditions, and potential areas for intervention. Compared with pre-pandemic narratives, individuals described having more passive roles, which focused on coping with, rather than changing, the considerable disruption to structures and procedures under pandemic conditions. Integration of findings across studies and chronological phases resulted in a proposed conceptual model of break taking in doctors.

Text
ONeill 2023 Exploring intrawork break taking in doctors - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (3MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mrs-Aimee-O-Neill
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: July 2023

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489744
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489744
PURE UUID: 53bc5402-78d6-4c1f-bf1a-2deb79f9de65
ORCID for Aimee Nicole O'Neill: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-6944
ORCID for Julia Sinclair: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1905-2025
ORCID for David Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 May 2024 16:58
Last modified: 21 Aug 2024 01:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: Aimee Nicole O'Neill ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Julia Sinclair ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: David Baldwin ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×