The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Audience costs among the British public: the impact of escalation, crisis type, and prime ministerial rhetoric

Audience costs among the British public: the impact of escalation, crisis type, and prime ministerial rhetoric
Audience costs among the British public: the impact of escalation, crisis type, and prime ministerial rhetoric

This article reports on an audience costs experiment embedded into a survey of the British public (N = 2235). We extend previous research into audience costs in three main directions. First, we provide clear and direct evidence that they exist for a second-order democratic power, the United Kingdom. Second, we show that the extent of audience costs varies, and at times substantially, along with features of the crisis situation that have not been examined empirically in this context before. In particular, the type of crisis strongly influences public reactions both to bluffing in general and to the wisdom or otherwise of escalating crises before backing down. While audience costs do appear to exist for a UK Prime Minister, he or she cannot inflate them by moving up the escalation chain. Rather, a limited use of force tends to mitigate these costs among the British public because it appears to them a more consistent strategy. Third, we show that public disapproval of a failed bluffing strategy is stronger among the more politically engaged, increasing the likelihood that audience costs will be paid at the ballot box.

0020-8833
725-737
Davies, Graeme A.M.
a60057a2-e466-429a-8634-a3a45fc45108
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35
Davies, Graeme A.M.
a60057a2-e466-429a-8634-a3a45fc45108
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35

Davies, Graeme A.M. and Johns, Robert (2013) Audience costs among the British public: the impact of escalation, crisis type, and prime ministerial rhetoric. International Studies Quarterly, 57 (4), 725-737. (doi:10.1111/isqu.12045).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article reports on an audience costs experiment embedded into a survey of the British public (N = 2235). We extend previous research into audience costs in three main directions. First, we provide clear and direct evidence that they exist for a second-order democratic power, the United Kingdom. Second, we show that the extent of audience costs varies, and at times substantially, along with features of the crisis situation that have not been examined empirically in this context before. In particular, the type of crisis strongly influences public reactions both to bluffing in general and to the wisdom or otherwise of escalating crises before backing down. While audience costs do appear to exist for a UK Prime Minister, he or she cannot inflate them by moving up the escalation chain. Rather, a limited use of force tends to mitigate these costs among the British public because it appears to them a more consistent strategy. Third, we show that public disapproval of a failed bluffing strategy is stronger among the more politically engaged, increasing the likelihood that audience costs will be paid at the ballot box.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489785
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489785
ISSN: 0020-8833
PURE UUID: 83acb17b-381c-460b-9f02-c1e9c8bad1df
ORCID for Robert Johns: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-7463

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2024 16:36
Last modified: 03 May 2024 02:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Graeme A.M. Davies
Author: Robert Johns ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×