Linking coalition attitudes and split-ticket voting: The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007
Linking coalition attitudes and split-ticket voting: The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007
The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007 were the third to be held under the country's mixed-member proportional system. As voters continue to adapt to the new system, we explore two aspects of its use: i) preferences for coalitions as opposed to single-party government, and ii) ticket-splitting. The two are considered together for two reasons. First, both can be seen as manifestations of a preference for multiple parties, and as a result they share a number of likely predictors in common. In empirical practice, however, we find that rather different factors predict the two variables: ticket-splitting looks to be based on strategic partisan or ideological calculation, whereas coalition attitudes are less about partisan interests and more about an overall view of the kind of policies and politics delivered by coalitions. Second, there is potential for a causal connection between our two dependent variables, and indeed we do find clear evidence of such an attitude-behaviour link: some voters appear to split their ticket precisely because they would prefer a coalition.
Coalition attitudes, Mixed-member proportional systems, Scottish Parliament elections, Ticket-splitting
381-391
Carman, Christopher J.
c62d237b-85a0-43ff-8e49-87e908bfbe5e
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35
September 2010
Carman, Christopher J.
c62d237b-85a0-43ff-8e49-87e908bfbe5e
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35
Carman, Christopher J. and Johns, Robert
(2010)
Linking coalition attitudes and split-ticket voting: The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007.
Electoral Studies, 29 (3), .
(doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.002).
Abstract
The Scottish Parliament elections of 2007 were the third to be held under the country's mixed-member proportional system. As voters continue to adapt to the new system, we explore two aspects of its use: i) preferences for coalitions as opposed to single-party government, and ii) ticket-splitting. The two are considered together for two reasons. First, both can be seen as manifestations of a preference for multiple parties, and as a result they share a number of likely predictors in common. In empirical practice, however, we find that rather different factors predict the two variables: ticket-splitting looks to be based on strategic partisan or ideological calculation, whereas coalition attitudes are less about partisan interests and more about an overall view of the kind of policies and politics delivered by coalitions. Second, there is potential for a causal connection between our two dependent variables, and indeed we do find clear evidence of such an attitude-behaviour link: some voters appear to split their ticket precisely because they would prefer a coalition.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 March 2010
Published date: September 2010
Keywords:
Coalition attitudes, Mixed-member proportional systems, Scottish Parliament elections, Ticket-splitting
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489790
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489790
ISSN: 0261-3794
PURE UUID: e70a5f54-4438-46c0-b11f-c54bb406a7be
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 May 2024 16:36
Last modified: 03 May 2024 02:07
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Christopher J. Carman
Author:
Robert Johns
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics