The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The unfortunate natural experiment in ballot design: the Scottish Parliamentary elections of 2007

The unfortunate natural experiment in ballot design: the Scottish Parliamentary elections of 2007
The unfortunate natural experiment in ballot design: the Scottish Parliamentary elections of 2007

The 2007 Scottish Parliamentary elections were notable for the extensive variation across constituencies in rejected ballots (ranging from 1.90% to 12.09%). This paper uses an unfortunate natural experiment to identify the influence of ballot design on the occurrence of rejected ballots, or 'residual votes'. In two electoral regions, visual prompts were removed and instructions were abbreviated on the (already poorly designed) ballot papers. Using zero-truncated negative binomial regression to model total residual votes as well as constituency and regional undervotes and overvotes, we find clear evidence that these changes made a major contribution to the extent of residual votes in constituencies within those regions. The findings emphasise that ballot design is not a trivial subject that can be neglected by electoral administrators.

Ballot design, Rejected ballots, Residual votes, Scottish elections
0261-3794
442-459
Carman, Christopher
c62d237b-85a0-43ff-8e49-87e908bfbe5e
Mitchell, James
0c4ca906-da8c-4d12-b288-0b72a194fc2e
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35
Carman, Christopher
c62d237b-85a0-43ff-8e49-87e908bfbe5e
Mitchell, James
0c4ca906-da8c-4d12-b288-0b72a194fc2e
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35

Carman, Christopher, Mitchell, James and Johns, Robert (2008) The unfortunate natural experiment in ballot design: the Scottish Parliamentary elections of 2007. Electoral Studies, 27 (3), 442-459. (doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The 2007 Scottish Parliamentary elections were notable for the extensive variation across constituencies in rejected ballots (ranging from 1.90% to 12.09%). This paper uses an unfortunate natural experiment to identify the influence of ballot design on the occurrence of rejected ballots, or 'residual votes'. In two electoral regions, visual prompts were removed and instructions were abbreviated on the (already poorly designed) ballot papers. Using zero-truncated negative binomial regression to model total residual votes as well as constituency and regional undervotes and overvotes, we find clear evidence that these changes made a major contribution to the extent of residual votes in constituencies within those regions. The findings emphasise that ballot design is not a trivial subject that can be neglected by electoral administrators.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 February 2008
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 April 2008
Published date: September 2008
Keywords: Ballot design, Rejected ballots, Residual votes, Scottish elections

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489799
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489799
ISSN: 0261-3794
PURE UUID: 80d953c3-842b-4b46-a0de-4b7e5be7dfd3
ORCID for Robert Johns: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-7463

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2024 16:37
Last modified: 03 May 2024 02:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christopher Carman
Author: James Mitchell
Author: Robert Johns ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×