The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An investigation into biometric signature capture device performance and user acceptance

An investigation into biometric signature capture device performance and user acceptance
An investigation into biometric signature capture device performance and user acceptance
The human signature provides a natural and publically-accepted legally-admissible method for providing authentication to a process. Automatic biometric signature systems assess both the drawn image and the temporal aspects of signature construction, providing enhanced verification rates over and above conventional outcome assessment. To enable the capture of these constructional data requires the use of specialist `tablet' devices. In this paper we explore the enrolment performance using a range of common signature capture devices and investigate the reasons behind user preference. The results show that writing feedback and familiarity with conventional `paper and pen' donation configurations are the primary motivation for user preference. These results inform the choice of signature device from both technical performance and user acceptance viewpoints.
performance evaluation, handwriting recognition, visualization, authentication, usability, ink, educational institutions
IEEE; Wiley
Brockly, Michael
cdd4bf94-eb75-4ffa-82db-1736992fc34c
Elliott, Stephen
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Burdine, Jarron
1e08555f-4ad7-48dc-a685-ebe90976e6cd
Frost, Michael
7238d2da-e846-4109-937a-cd50caed128d
Riedle, Matthew
ada774d1-a8f9-45f5-8755-5ef521ad59f4
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165
Brockly, Michael
cdd4bf94-eb75-4ffa-82db-1736992fc34c
Elliott, Stephen
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Burdine, Jarron
1e08555f-4ad7-48dc-a685-ebe90976e6cd
Frost, Michael
7238d2da-e846-4109-937a-cd50caed128d
Riedle, Matthew
ada774d1-a8f9-45f5-8755-5ef521ad59f4
Guest, Richard
93533dbd-b101-491b-83cc-39ccfdc18165

Brockly, Michael, Elliott, Stephen, Burdine, Jarron, Frost, Michael, Riedle, Matthew and Guest, Richard (2014) An investigation into biometric signature capture device performance and user acceptance. In 2014 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST). IEEE; Wiley. 5 pp . (doi:10.1109/CCST.2014.6986970).

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The human signature provides a natural and publically-accepted legally-admissible method for providing authentication to a process. Automatic biometric signature systems assess both the drawn image and the temporal aspects of signature construction, providing enhanced verification rates over and above conventional outcome assessment. To enable the capture of these constructional data requires the use of specialist `tablet' devices. In this paper we explore the enrolment performance using a range of common signature capture devices and investigate the reasons behind user preference. The results show that writing feedback and familiarity with conventional `paper and pen' donation configurations are the primary motivation for user preference. These results inform the choice of signature device from both technical performance and user acceptance viewpoints.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 October 2014
Keywords: performance evaluation, handwriting recognition, visualization, authentication, usability, ink, educational institutions

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 489821
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489821
PURE UUID: ec6dd237-bdef-43b2-b1cf-4750496c6eb1
ORCID for Richard Guest: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-7336

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2024 16:52
Last modified: 03 May 2024 02:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Michael Brockly
Author: Stephen Elliott
Author: Jarron Burdine
Author: Michael Frost
Author: Matthew Riedle
Author: Richard Guest ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×