Measuring political behaviour and attitudes
Measuring political behaviour and attitudes
To the casual observer, measurement in political behaviour might look a decidedly ropey business. Opinion polls frequently get election outcomes wrong, sometimes spectacularly so, as we saw in 1992 when a Labour victory was widely predicted, only for the Tories to return to power with something to spare. Moreover, even after the event, the survey tally of votes cast for political parties rarely matches their actual vote share, and levels of turnout are seriously over-reported, almost to the tune of 20 percentage points in the 2005 British Election Study (BES). These large discrepancies between survey estimates of political behaviour and official tallies are undoubtedly a cause for concern; if surveys cannot be relied upon to get these basic objective facts of elections correct, or even close to the true mark, then they have little hope of accurately measuring the less tangible concepts in political science, such as party identification and political attitudes. These doubts are clearly not without foundation, but at the same time neither should they be overstated. In virtually no other field of survey research are the results faced with such immediate tests of their accuracy; as Jowell et al. (1993) note, most are never tested at all. These ‘tests’ have provided a fertile ground for examining the sources of the discrepancy between survey estimates of political phenomena and the official results, and in this way prior research has been able to shed light on the nature and magnitude of many of the factors that influence measurement problems in survey research. The findings from this research have relevance for a wide variety of measurement problems, and as we examine in this chapter, lessons can be taken on board to improve our understanding of other less easily verified phenomena.
47-68
Heath, Oliver
84206364-3c47-4395-bd31-5b7f3b48fc60
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35
2010
Heath, Oliver
84206364-3c47-4395-bd31-5b7f3b48fc60
Johns, Robert
02861bc9-b704-49b1-bbc7-cf1c1e9b7a35
Heath, Oliver and Johns, Robert
(2010)
Measuring political behaviour and attitudes.
In,
Bulmer, Martin
(ed.)
Social Measurement through Social Surveys: An Applied Approach.
Taylor & Francis, .
(doi:10.4324/9781315609492-5).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
To the casual observer, measurement in political behaviour might look a decidedly ropey business. Opinion polls frequently get election outcomes wrong, sometimes spectacularly so, as we saw in 1992 when a Labour victory was widely predicted, only for the Tories to return to power with something to spare. Moreover, even after the event, the survey tally of votes cast for political parties rarely matches their actual vote share, and levels of turnout are seriously over-reported, almost to the tune of 20 percentage points in the 2005 British Election Study (BES). These large discrepancies between survey estimates of political behaviour and official tallies are undoubtedly a cause for concern; if surveys cannot be relied upon to get these basic objective facts of elections correct, or even close to the true mark, then they have little hope of accurately measuring the less tangible concepts in political science, such as party identification and political attitudes. These doubts are clearly not without foundation, but at the same time neither should they be overstated. In virtually no other field of survey research are the results faced with such immediate tests of their accuracy; as Jowell et al. (1993) note, most are never tested at all. These ‘tests’ have provided a fertile ground for examining the sources of the discrepancy between survey estimates of political phenomena and the official results, and in this way prior research has been able to shed light on the nature and magnitude of many of the factors that influence measurement problems in survey research. The findings from this research have relevance for a wide variety of measurement problems, and as we examine in this chapter, lessons can be taken on board to improve our understanding of other less easily verified phenomena.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2010
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 489938
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/489938
PURE UUID: 16f1c46d-8fb4-4d2e-bdb1-8adec450b029
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 May 2024 17:00
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Oliver Heath
Author:
Robert Johns
Editor:
Martin Bulmer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics