The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Elaborating the “Don’t Need Boundaries” element of the Pirie–Kieren Theory

Elaborating the “Don’t Need Boundaries” element of the Pirie–Kieren Theory
Elaborating the “Don’t Need Boundaries” element of the Pirie–Kieren Theory
This paper seeks to contribute to the theoretical literature on mathematical understanding by elaborating an essential, yet under-researched and sometimes queried, element of the Pirie-Kieren theory, the Don’t Need Boundaries (DNBs). In the Pirie and Kieren (1989) model, the DNBs are depicted as three bold rings that are positioned between the layers of Image Making and Image Having, Property Noticing and Formalising, Observing and Structuring. The ‘Don’t Need’ label suggests that an individual working outside a DNB can work independently of the specific inner layer of understanding that produced the knowing in an outer layer
Our discussion is based on close examination of evidence drawn from a qualitative, microgenetic research study, with the participation of nine 9-year-old children. Children participated in eight problem solving sessions that involved more than one trial with novel for them, partitive quotient tasks. We discuss two types of identified DNB crossings: bi-directional and uni-directional DNBs crossings and associated variations in children’s problem solving behaviours at these crossings.
For the given tasks, after having crossed the first DNB, children were more likely to return to inner layers of the model than after having crossed the second DNB. We thus propose that the first two DNBs are qualitatively different in that the first DNB crossing appears to be less ‘secure’ than the second. We suggest a visual amendment to the model that accounts for this observation. We propose that folding back and spending time beyond the first DNB are essential processes through which the first DNB crossing can become more secure and the first DNB less porous. This paper adds further detail in delineating the DNBs as significant points of potentiality for crossing to a layer of operation that does not require reference to basic concepts, rather than as points that necessarily involve secure crossings to an outer layer of abstraction.
0228-0671
George, Lois
6c424441-6d1b-4f7f-a370-9419549954b8
Voutsina, Chronoula
bd9934e7-f8e0-4b82-a664-a1fe48850082
George, Lois
6c424441-6d1b-4f7f-a370-9419549954b8
Voutsina, Chronoula
bd9934e7-f8e0-4b82-a664-a1fe48850082

George, Lois and Voutsina, Chronoula (2024) Elaborating the “Don’t Need Boundaries” element of the Pirie–Kieren Theory. For the Learning of Mathematics. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper seeks to contribute to the theoretical literature on mathematical understanding by elaborating an essential, yet under-researched and sometimes queried, element of the Pirie-Kieren theory, the Don’t Need Boundaries (DNBs). In the Pirie and Kieren (1989) model, the DNBs are depicted as three bold rings that are positioned between the layers of Image Making and Image Having, Property Noticing and Formalising, Observing and Structuring. The ‘Don’t Need’ label suggests that an individual working outside a DNB can work independently of the specific inner layer of understanding that produced the knowing in an outer layer
Our discussion is based on close examination of evidence drawn from a qualitative, microgenetic research study, with the participation of nine 9-year-old children. Children participated in eight problem solving sessions that involved more than one trial with novel for them, partitive quotient tasks. We discuss two types of identified DNB crossings: bi-directional and uni-directional DNBs crossings and associated variations in children’s problem solving behaviours at these crossings.
For the given tasks, after having crossed the first DNB, children were more likely to return to inner layers of the model than after having crossed the second DNB. We thus propose that the first two DNBs are qualitatively different in that the first DNB crossing appears to be less ‘secure’ than the second. We suggest a visual amendment to the model that accounts for this observation. We propose that folding back and spending time beyond the first DNB are essential processes through which the first DNB crossing can become more secure and the first DNB less porous. This paper adds further detail in delineating the DNBs as significant points of potentiality for crossing to a layer of operation that does not require reference to basic concepts, rather than as points that necessarily involve secure crossings to an outer layer of abstraction.

Text
George_and_Voutsina_FLM_accepted_version_pre-editing - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
George and Voutsina_FLM accepted version pre-editing
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 March 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490016
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490016
ISSN: 0228-0671
PURE UUID: f83354a4-b69f-43af-9a6a-f719da6c00da
ORCID for Chronoula Voutsina: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-5816

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 May 2024 16:46
Last modified: 14 May 2024 01:39

Export record

Contributors

Author: Lois George

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×