The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: the ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial

Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: the ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial
Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: the ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial
Purpose: to compare outcomes after laparoscopic versus open major liver resection (hemihepatectomy) mainly for primary or metastatic cancer. The primary outcome measure was time to functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, quality of life (QoL), and for those with cancer, resection margin status and time to adjuvant systemic therapy.

Patients and methods: this was a multicenter, randomized controlled, patient-blinded, superiority trial on adult patients undergoing hemihepatectomy. Patients were recruited from 16 hospitals in Europe between November 2013 and December 2018.

Results: of the 352 randomly assigned patients, 332 patients (94.3%) underwent surgery (laparoscopic, n = 166 and open, n = 166) and comprised the analysis population. The median time to functional recovery was 4 days (IQR, 3-5; range, 1-30) for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy versus 5 days (IQR, 4-6; range, 1-33) for open hemihepatectomy (difference, –17.5% [96% CI, –25.6 to –8.4]; P < .001). There was no difference in major complications (laparoscopic 24/166 [14.5%] v open 28/166 [16.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.84; P = .58). Regarding QoL, both global health status (difference, 3.2 points; P < .001) and body image (difference, 0.9 points; P < .001) scored significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. For the 281 (84.6%) patients with cancer, R0 resection margin status was similar (laparoscopic 106 [77.9%] v open 122 patients [84.1%], OR, 0.60; P = .14) with a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy in the laparoscopic group (46.5 days v 62.8 days, hazard ratio, 2.20; P = .009).

Conclusion: among patients undergoing hemihepatectomy, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a shorter time to functional recovery compared with open surgery. In addition, it was associated with a better QoL, and in patients with cancer, a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy with no adverse impact on cancer outcomes observed.
1527-7755
1799-1809
Fichtinger, Robert S.
055adb24-2b61-43e7-b4f5-a934d573aedb
Aldrighetti, Luca A.
a4b19d20-4a6e-4b98-9267-f76edcd689a0
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
2b7464e5-6a59-4bd8-bfe4-27a1918a5c5a
Troisi, Roberto I.
df5768ed-f8cb-43e1-9ccf-ed295f6ee9ef
Sutcliffe, Robert P.
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Besselink, Marc G.
45b5ed26-b8ed-4706-902f-b36907ed0994
Aroori, Somaiah
842a95b8-42fb-462d-85a7-faeefd6ecea0
Menon, Krishna V.
d07aeb0b-4e37-4f9a-b23c-55d5d35fa535
Edwin, Bjørn
b04994d3-928a-49ad-8bdf-183c7e7a08d2
D'Hondt, Mathieu
c0a0e77a-094e-4173-a571-453cb3a1e1d9
Lucidi, Valerio
e74c3eac-96fc-45c5-a102-592f2228232f
Ulmer, Tom F.
b0eaaf07-a6ee-457f-ae70-03ed64cbe8c1
Díaz-Nieto, Rafael
d2ca8448-b3ea-4fe9-b432-2e23e3f160c3
Soonawalla, Zahir
ecf14061-123f-4afe-9a01-1c65b0ac6444
White, Steve
2bd36562-6150-4b23-b3fb-0e88a5954b69
Sergeant, Gregory
149ac3d4-773f-429c-bd35-d017839e1ad1
Olij, Bram
7addf0b3-df3a-44d0-8e15-bb5105fb20ec
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
Kuemmerli, Christoph
85b9f630-6845-4b8a-bbd7-76ace58cebfb
Scuderi, Vincenzo
6b920de1-37cb-4934-809a-e2ba819780f9
Berrevoet, Frederik
e545a28b-7399-4d20-b6e2-599ae383b08e
Vanlander, Aude
2efe8992-66f1-4fb2-bca2-1f070c31b274
Marudanayagam, Ravi
82602f42-5ef6-4f04-a166-c85ce3bd4d23
Tanis, Pieter
5f6e4b25-4118-4d67-a233-825e662346f4
Dewulf, Maxime J.L.
01c88690-d86d-4f93-8dc5-00cd30f12281
Dejong, Cornelis H.C.
82dea799-a6e2-46ab-9311-c537581cba18
Eminton, Zina
44904d98-97be-4080-9a84-bf5742525f8e
Kimman, Merel L.
ffcd4f80-4d0a-4f0d-bd4a-89f5655d3f01
Brandts, Lloyd
b4e4d995-9b05-4659-ba6f-aaae93adc1d4
Neumann, Ulf P.
cb306c3e-1326-4b16-8628-753795be9f17
Fretland, Åsmund A.
e1edf2e5-06ee-43eb-b2b3-33ae0ca63ad3
Pugh, Siân A.
e0d0bdb3-f772-48b2-84bd-fb25045bef94
van Breukelen, Gerard J.P.
8379c2c7-5462-4b8e-8195-178bb03ce6e9
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
van Dam, Ronald M.
7523218d-f43b-4c5c-9117-b4e22649eab3
ORANGE II PLUS Collaborative
Fichtinger, Robert S.
055adb24-2b61-43e7-b4f5-a934d573aedb
Aldrighetti, Luca A.
a4b19d20-4a6e-4b98-9267-f76edcd689a0
Abu Hilal, Mohammed
2b7464e5-6a59-4bd8-bfe4-27a1918a5c5a
Troisi, Roberto I.
df5768ed-f8cb-43e1-9ccf-ed295f6ee9ef
Sutcliffe, Robert P.
53a0327d-e30f-4bf9-a284-986a82268276
Besselink, Marc G.
45b5ed26-b8ed-4706-902f-b36907ed0994
Aroori, Somaiah
842a95b8-42fb-462d-85a7-faeefd6ecea0
Menon, Krishna V.
d07aeb0b-4e37-4f9a-b23c-55d5d35fa535
Edwin, Bjørn
b04994d3-928a-49ad-8bdf-183c7e7a08d2
D'Hondt, Mathieu
c0a0e77a-094e-4173-a571-453cb3a1e1d9
Lucidi, Valerio
e74c3eac-96fc-45c5-a102-592f2228232f
Ulmer, Tom F.
b0eaaf07-a6ee-457f-ae70-03ed64cbe8c1
Díaz-Nieto, Rafael
d2ca8448-b3ea-4fe9-b432-2e23e3f160c3
Soonawalla, Zahir
ecf14061-123f-4afe-9a01-1c65b0ac6444
White, Steve
2bd36562-6150-4b23-b3fb-0e88a5954b69
Sergeant, Gregory
149ac3d4-773f-429c-bd35-d017839e1ad1
Olij, Bram
7addf0b3-df3a-44d0-8e15-bb5105fb20ec
Ratti, Francesca
6ee4b291-99b0-48c7-b983-6f0f9e14d90d
Kuemmerli, Christoph
85b9f630-6845-4b8a-bbd7-76ace58cebfb
Scuderi, Vincenzo
6b920de1-37cb-4934-809a-e2ba819780f9
Berrevoet, Frederik
e545a28b-7399-4d20-b6e2-599ae383b08e
Vanlander, Aude
2efe8992-66f1-4fb2-bca2-1f070c31b274
Marudanayagam, Ravi
82602f42-5ef6-4f04-a166-c85ce3bd4d23
Tanis, Pieter
5f6e4b25-4118-4d67-a233-825e662346f4
Dewulf, Maxime J.L.
01c88690-d86d-4f93-8dc5-00cd30f12281
Dejong, Cornelis H.C.
82dea799-a6e2-46ab-9311-c537581cba18
Eminton, Zina
44904d98-97be-4080-9a84-bf5742525f8e
Kimman, Merel L.
ffcd4f80-4d0a-4f0d-bd4a-89f5655d3f01
Brandts, Lloyd
b4e4d995-9b05-4659-ba6f-aaae93adc1d4
Neumann, Ulf P.
cb306c3e-1326-4b16-8628-753795be9f17
Fretland, Åsmund A.
e1edf2e5-06ee-43eb-b2b3-33ae0ca63ad3
Pugh, Siân A.
e0d0bdb3-f772-48b2-84bd-fb25045bef94
van Breukelen, Gerard J.P.
8379c2c7-5462-4b8e-8195-178bb03ce6e9
Primrose, John N.
d85f3b28-24c6-475f-955b-ec457a3f9185
van Dam, Ronald M.
7523218d-f43b-4c5c-9117-b4e22649eab3

Fichtinger, Robert S., Aldrighetti, Luca A. and Abu Hilal, Mohammed , ORANGE II PLUS Collaborative (2024) Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: the ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 42 (15), 1799-1809, [JCO2301019]. (doi:10.1200/JCO.23.01019).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: to compare outcomes after laparoscopic versus open major liver resection (hemihepatectomy) mainly for primary or metastatic cancer. The primary outcome measure was time to functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included morbidity, quality of life (QoL), and for those with cancer, resection margin status and time to adjuvant systemic therapy.

Patients and methods: this was a multicenter, randomized controlled, patient-blinded, superiority trial on adult patients undergoing hemihepatectomy. Patients were recruited from 16 hospitals in Europe between November 2013 and December 2018.

Results: of the 352 randomly assigned patients, 332 patients (94.3%) underwent surgery (laparoscopic, n = 166 and open, n = 166) and comprised the analysis population. The median time to functional recovery was 4 days (IQR, 3-5; range, 1-30) for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy versus 5 days (IQR, 4-6; range, 1-33) for open hemihepatectomy (difference, –17.5% [96% CI, –25.6 to –8.4]; P < .001). There was no difference in major complications (laparoscopic 24/166 [14.5%] v open 28/166 [16.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.84; P = .58). Regarding QoL, both global health status (difference, 3.2 points; P < .001) and body image (difference, 0.9 points; P < .001) scored significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. For the 281 (84.6%) patients with cancer, R0 resection margin status was similar (laparoscopic 106 [77.9%] v open 122 patients [84.1%], OR, 0.60; P = .14) with a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy in the laparoscopic group (46.5 days v 62.8 days, hazard ratio, 2.20; P = .009).

Conclusion: among patients undergoing hemihepatectomy, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a shorter time to functional recovery compared with open surgery. In addition, it was associated with a better QoL, and in patients with cancer, a shorter time to adjuvant systemic therapy with no adverse impact on cancer outcomes observed.

Text
fichtinger-et-al-2024-laparoscopic-versus-open-hemihepatectomy-the-orange-ii-plus-multicenter-randomized-controlled - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 January 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 19 April 2024
Published date: 20 May 2024
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490037
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490037
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: d6a1838d-3c83-49e7-abff-2e79cefa1bb2
ORCID for John N. Primrose: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2069-7605

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 May 2024 16:30
Last modified: 05 Jun 2024 01:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert S. Fichtinger
Author: Luca A. Aldrighetti
Author: Mohammed Abu Hilal
Author: Roberto I. Troisi
Author: Robert P. Sutcliffe
Author: Marc G. Besselink
Author: Somaiah Aroori
Author: Krishna V. Menon
Author: Bjørn Edwin
Author: Mathieu D'Hondt
Author: Valerio Lucidi
Author: Tom F. Ulmer
Author: Rafael Díaz-Nieto
Author: Zahir Soonawalla
Author: Steve White
Author: Gregory Sergeant
Author: Bram Olij
Author: Francesca Ratti
Author: Christoph Kuemmerli
Author: Vincenzo Scuderi
Author: Frederik Berrevoet
Author: Aude Vanlander
Author: Ravi Marudanayagam
Author: Pieter Tanis
Author: Maxime J.L. Dewulf
Author: Cornelis H.C. Dejong
Author: Zina Eminton
Author: Merel L. Kimman
Author: Lloyd Brandts
Author: Ulf P. Neumann
Author: Åsmund A. Fretland
Author: Siân A. Pugh
Author: Gerard J.P. van Breukelen
Author: Ronald M. van Dam
Corporate Author: ORANGE II PLUS Collaborative

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×