Do differences in educational culture affect the process and outcome of undergraduate design practice?
Do differences in educational culture affect the process and outcome of undergraduate design practice?
Designers undertake projects in different ways, and as might be expected, these have the potential to produce a wide variety of outputs. While the designed artefact is understandably often the focus when evaluating student designers, the importance of process is paramount in design education. This is underpinned by the fact that a novice designer may produce a single successful project without a full understanding of how that artefact came about. However, a designer who can reflect upon and understand the process, is better equipped to repeat or further evolve this process in future projects. It is well understood that organisational structure and culture influences the ways designers choose to approach a project, from initial brief formation, through ideation and development, to the detail design and execution phases. An aspect not thoroughly understood is how different methods in design education specifically influence the methodologies designers employ in approaching a project, and therefore that projects outcome. Previous work has examined the influence of cultural background on the formation of a design brief, but not on the entire process. This research attempts to understand that influence, by forming links between the educational background as an input and process and artefact as outputs. This paper proposes a research framework in which both artefact and process are examined. To this end, cultural probe type tools, which actively encourage design students to reflect upon and report upon their process during a design project, are used to allow student design practitioners to self-report their design process.
Almrott, Ceri
e68203f5-fb69-4b14-aa36-3dede5493ac8
O'Kane, Colm
8e01b53c-2105-4c04-9c32-9fb0788dc73b
Tully, Robert
aa516561-2b28-4bfc-a916-cfd185daf2dd
Buck, Lyndon
49b03b09-a98b-4edb-9b14-f5a8f6363971
2020
Almrott, Ceri
e68203f5-fb69-4b14-aa36-3dede5493ac8
O'Kane, Colm
8e01b53c-2105-4c04-9c32-9fb0788dc73b
Tully, Robert
aa516561-2b28-4bfc-a916-cfd185daf2dd
Buck, Lyndon
49b03b09-a98b-4edb-9b14-f5a8f6363971
Almrott, Ceri, O'Kane, Colm, Tully, Robert and Buck, Lyndon
(2020)
Do differences in educational culture affect the process and outcome of undergraduate design practice?
Buck, Lyndon, Bohemia, Erik and Grierson, Hilary
(eds.)
In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2020), VIA Design, VIA University in Herning, Denmark. 10th -11th September 2020: The Value of Design & Engineering Education in a Knowledge Age.
The Design Society.
6 pp
.
(doi:10.35199/EPDE.2020.20).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Designers undertake projects in different ways, and as might be expected, these have the potential to produce a wide variety of outputs. While the designed artefact is understandably often the focus when evaluating student designers, the importance of process is paramount in design education. This is underpinned by the fact that a novice designer may produce a single successful project without a full understanding of how that artefact came about. However, a designer who can reflect upon and understand the process, is better equipped to repeat or further evolve this process in future projects. It is well understood that organisational structure and culture influences the ways designers choose to approach a project, from initial brief formation, through ideation and development, to the detail design and execution phases. An aspect not thoroughly understood is how different methods in design education specifically influence the methodologies designers employ in approaching a project, and therefore that projects outcome. Previous work has examined the influence of cultural background on the formation of a design brief, but not on the entire process. This research attempts to understand that influence, by forming links between the educational background as an input and process and artefact as outputs. This paper proposes a research framework in which both artefact and process are examined. To this end, cultural probe type tools, which actively encourage design students to reflect upon and report upon their process during a design project, are used to allow student design practitioners to self-report their design process.
Text
1152
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2020
Venue - Dates:
22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, VIA University College, Herning, Denmark, 2020-09-10 - 2020-09-11
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490078
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490078
PURE UUID: 0aaad4fa-14f0-4854-8130-7aa17348fade
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 May 2024 16:42
Last modified: 15 May 2024 02:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ceri Almrott
Author:
Colm O'Kane
Author:
Robert Tully
Author:
Lyndon Buck
Editor:
Lyndon Buck
Editor:
Erik Bohemia
Editor:
Hilary Grierson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics