A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients
A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients
Objective: To compare the survival and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients treated with the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to those treated without the use of a PAC. Design: Prospective, randomised, controlled, clinical trial from October 1997 to February 1999. Setting: Adult intensive care unit at a large teaching hospital. Patients: Two hundred one critically ill patients were randomised either to a PAC group (n=95) or the control group (n=106). One patient in the control group was withdrawn from the study and five patients in the PAC group did not receive a PAC. All participants were available for follow-up. Interventions: Participants were assigned to be managed either with the use of a PAC (PAC group) or without the use of a PAC (control group). Main outcome measures: Survival to 28 days, intensive care and hospital length of stay and organ dysfunction were compared on an intention-to-treat basis and also on a subgroup basis for those participants who successfully received a PAC. Results: There was no significant difference in mortality between the PAC group [46/95 (47.9%)] and the control group [50/106 (47.6)] (95% confidence intervals for the difference -13 to 14%, p>0.99). The mortality for participants who had management decisions based on information derived from a PAC was 41/91 (45%, 95% confidence intervals -11 to 16%, p=0.77). The PAC group had significantly more fluids in the first 24 h (4953 (3140, 7000) versus 4292 (2535, 6049) ml) and an increased incidence of renal failure (35 versus 20% of patients at day 3 post randomisation p<0.05) and thrombocytopenia (p<0.03). Conclusions: These results suggest that the PAC is not associated with an increased mortality.
Critically ill patients, Intention-to-treat, No increased mortality, Pulmonary artery catheter
256-264
Rhodes, Andrew
99296ab8-d95e-4088-a872-8b7d9875224f
Cusack, Rebecca J.
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
Newman, Philip J.
d22bc830-b7c4-4b8e-8c8e-a0f4cd4a45c1
Grounds, Michael R.
7bcc2e92-1d00-4c27-ae88-273e9ae22ed8
Bennett, David E.
43df1916-4a46-46db-9044-b18672f49f06
13 February 2002
Rhodes, Andrew
99296ab8-d95e-4088-a872-8b7d9875224f
Cusack, Rebecca J.
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
Newman, Philip J.
d22bc830-b7c4-4b8e-8c8e-a0f4cd4a45c1
Grounds, Michael R.
7bcc2e92-1d00-4c27-ae88-273e9ae22ed8
Bennett, David E.
43df1916-4a46-46db-9044-b18672f49f06
Rhodes, Andrew, Cusack, Rebecca J., Newman, Philip J., Grounds, Michael R. and Bennett, David E.
(2002)
A randomised, controlled trial of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients.
Intensive Care Medicine, 28 (3), .
(doi:10.1007/s00134-002-1206-9).
Abstract
Objective: To compare the survival and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients treated with the use of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) to those treated without the use of a PAC. Design: Prospective, randomised, controlled, clinical trial from October 1997 to February 1999. Setting: Adult intensive care unit at a large teaching hospital. Patients: Two hundred one critically ill patients were randomised either to a PAC group (n=95) or the control group (n=106). One patient in the control group was withdrawn from the study and five patients in the PAC group did not receive a PAC. All participants were available for follow-up. Interventions: Participants were assigned to be managed either with the use of a PAC (PAC group) or without the use of a PAC (control group). Main outcome measures: Survival to 28 days, intensive care and hospital length of stay and organ dysfunction were compared on an intention-to-treat basis and also on a subgroup basis for those participants who successfully received a PAC. Results: There was no significant difference in mortality between the PAC group [46/95 (47.9%)] and the control group [50/106 (47.6)] (95% confidence intervals for the difference -13 to 14%, p>0.99). The mortality for participants who had management decisions based on information derived from a PAC was 41/91 (45%, 95% confidence intervals -11 to 16%, p=0.77). The PAC group had significantly more fluids in the first 24 h (4953 (3140, 7000) versus 4292 (2535, 6049) ml) and an increased incidence of renal failure (35 versus 20% of patients at day 3 post randomisation p<0.05) and thrombocytopenia (p<0.03). Conclusions: These results suggest that the PAC is not associated with an increased mortality.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 13 February 2002
Keywords:
Critically ill patients, Intention-to-treat, No increased mortality, Pulmonary artery catheter
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490140
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490140
ISSN: 0342-4642
PURE UUID: 4f28b8d2-a950-4da8-9078-4868b75572c1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 May 2024 16:37
Last modified: 16 May 2024 01:53
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Andrew Rhodes
Author:
Rebecca J. Cusack
Author:
Philip J. Newman
Author:
Michael R. Grounds
Author:
David E. Bennett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics