The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU
The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU
Objective: To examine whether the strong ion gap (SIG) or standard base excess corrected for abnormalities of serum chloride and albumin (BEUA) can predict outcome and to compare the prognostic abilities of these variables with standard base excess (SBE), anion gap (AG), pH, and lactate, the more traditional markers of acid-base disturbance. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: University teaching hospital, general adult ICU. Patients: One hundred consecutive patients on admission to the ICU. Measurements and results: The anion gap (AG) was calculated and corrected for abnormal serum albumin (AGcorrected). Serum lactate was measured and SBE, BEUA, SIG, and APACHE II scores calculated for each patient. 28-day survival was recorded. There was a significant difference between the mean APACHE II (P<0.001), SBE (P<0.001), lactate (P=0.008), AG (P=0.007), pH (P<0.001), and BEUA (P=0.009) of survivors and non-survivors. There was no significant difference between the mean SIG (P=0.088), SIDeff (P=0.025), and SID app (P=0.254) between survivors and non-survivors. The pH and SBE demonstrated the best ability of the acid-base variables to predict outcome (AUROC curves 0.72 and 0.71, respectively). Neither of these were as good as the APACHE II score (AUROC 0.76) Conclusion: Traditional indices of SBE, BEUA, lactate, pH, AG, and APACHE II all discriminated well between survivors and non-survivors. In this group of patients the SIG, SIDeff, and SIGapp appear to offer no advantage in prediction of outcome and their use as prognostic markers can therefore not be advocated.
Acid-base disturbance, Prognostic indicators, Standard base excess, Strong ion gap
864-869
Cusack, R.
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
Rhodes, A.
c6582f43-4f26-4694-b6ed-dd30de1fecbc
Lochhead, P.
e0e674f3-e16f-4c6d-a4cb-a969e30b5bdb
Jordan, B.
929cc859-cecd-48d4-ae5e-0c4a08b3dae5
Perry, S.
d204a202-c773-4cdc-a3b3-93e3997a0d1f
Ball, J.
628ed61b-d43f-418b-98e2-c2422c35cfdb
Grounds, R.
95a6b939-570c-4e81-96c7-6b758d76b6fa
Bennett, E.
d554265d-fc37-42e2-8de4-2a0999bff5f6
14 June 2002
Cusack, R.
dfb1595f-2792-4f76-ac6d-da027cf40146
Rhodes, A.
c6582f43-4f26-4694-b6ed-dd30de1fecbc
Lochhead, P.
e0e674f3-e16f-4c6d-a4cb-a969e30b5bdb
Jordan, B.
929cc859-cecd-48d4-ae5e-0c4a08b3dae5
Perry, S.
d204a202-c773-4cdc-a3b3-93e3997a0d1f
Ball, J.
628ed61b-d43f-418b-98e2-c2422c35cfdb
Grounds, R.
95a6b939-570c-4e81-96c7-6b758d76b6fa
Bennett, E.
d554265d-fc37-42e2-8de4-2a0999bff5f6
Cusack, R., Rhodes, A., Lochhead, P., Jordan, B., Perry, S., Ball, J., Grounds, R. and Bennett, E.
(2002)
The strong ion gap does not have prognostic value in critically ill patients in a mixed medical/surgical adult ICU.
Intensive Care Medicine, 28 (7), .
(doi:10.1007/s00134-002-1318-2).
Abstract
Objective: To examine whether the strong ion gap (SIG) or standard base excess corrected for abnormalities of serum chloride and albumin (BEUA) can predict outcome and to compare the prognostic abilities of these variables with standard base excess (SBE), anion gap (AG), pH, and lactate, the more traditional markers of acid-base disturbance. Design: Prospective, observational study. Setting: University teaching hospital, general adult ICU. Patients: One hundred consecutive patients on admission to the ICU. Measurements and results: The anion gap (AG) was calculated and corrected for abnormal serum albumin (AGcorrected). Serum lactate was measured and SBE, BEUA, SIG, and APACHE II scores calculated for each patient. 28-day survival was recorded. There was a significant difference between the mean APACHE II (P<0.001), SBE (P<0.001), lactate (P=0.008), AG (P=0.007), pH (P<0.001), and BEUA (P=0.009) of survivors and non-survivors. There was no significant difference between the mean SIG (P=0.088), SIDeff (P=0.025), and SID app (P=0.254) between survivors and non-survivors. The pH and SBE demonstrated the best ability of the acid-base variables to predict outcome (AUROC curves 0.72 and 0.71, respectively). Neither of these were as good as the APACHE II score (AUROC 0.76) Conclusion: Traditional indices of SBE, BEUA, lactate, pH, AG, and APACHE II all discriminated well between survivors and non-survivors. In this group of patients the SIG, SIDeff, and SIGapp appear to offer no advantage in prediction of outcome and their use as prognostic markers can therefore not be advocated.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 14 June 2002
Keywords:
Acid-base disturbance, Prognostic indicators, Standard base excess, Strong ion gap
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490143
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490143
ISSN: 0342-4642
PURE UUID: 86677823-8cae-49b3-9101-9110ad008da8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 May 2024 16:41
Last modified: 16 May 2024 01:53
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R. Cusack
Author:
A. Rhodes
Author:
P. Lochhead
Author:
B. Jordan
Author:
S. Perry
Author:
J. Ball
Author:
R. Grounds
Author:
E. Bennett
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics