Improving invertebrate welfare
Improving invertebrate welfare
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that it is wrong, both scientifically and morally, to dismiss the evidence for sentience in invertebrates. They do not offer any examples, however, of how their welfare should be considered or improved. We draw on animal welfare science to suggest some ways that would not be excessively demanding.
Browning, Heather
8d13aa04-7648-4403-b29c-11f7674f6618
Veit, Walter
8137e8be-a04c-41c6-979e-87fe1a4010be
2020
Browning, Heather
8d13aa04-7648-4403-b29c-11f7674f6618
Veit, Walter
8137e8be-a04c-41c6-979e-87fe1a4010be
Browning, Heather and Veit, Walter
(2020)
Improving invertebrate welfare.
Animal Sentience, 5 (29), [4].
(doi:10.51291/2377-7478.1585).
Abstract
Mikhalevich & Powell (2020) argue that it is wrong, both scientifically and morally, to dismiss the evidence for sentience in invertebrates. They do not offer any examples, however, of how their welfare should be considered or improved. We draw on animal welfare science to suggest some ways that would not be excessively demanding.
Text
Improving invertebrate welfare
- Version of Record
More information
Submitted date: 11 June 2020
Accepted/In Press date: 15 June 2020
Published date: 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490234
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490234
PURE UUID: 5109e064-345b-4398-8306-8a1ccfb57571
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 May 2024 17:42
Last modified: 21 May 2024 02:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Heather Browning
Author:
Walter Veit
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics