Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials
Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials
Background: patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapy might require treatment with systemic therapies, including biologics. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in patients who previously received systemic therapies.
Methods: this post hoc analysis included patients receiving abrocitinib (200 mg/100 mg) or placebo in the phase 2b and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 and MONO-2, REGIMEN (abrocitinib 200 mg; open-label period) and EXTEND (patients enrolled from MONO-1 and MONO-2) trials. Patients who were systemic therapy-naive or had received prior oral systemic or biologic therapies were assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement from baseline, ≥75% or ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 or EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), PP-NRS score of 0 or 1 and change from baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores. Safety was assessed.
Results: this analysis included 1579 patients (systemic therapy-naive, n = 997; prior exposure to oral systemic, n = 429; biologic therapies, n = 153). At Week 12, IGA 0/1 response rates (95% confidence intervals) among patients who were systemic therapy-naive, had received prior oral systemic therapy or had received biologic therapy were 44.4% (37.5–51.4), 34.5% (22.3–46.7) and 43.5% (23.2–63.7) with abrocitinib 200 mg, 30.9% (24.2–37.5), 16.4% (7.1–25.7) and 24.1% (8.6–39.7) with abrocitinib 100 mg and 9.6% (4.2–14.9), 5.9% (0.0–13.8) and 0.0% (0.0–23.2) with placebo in the pooled monotherapy trials; and 67.0% (62.8–71.2), 62.2% (56.4–68.0) and 53.5% (42.9–64.0) in REGIMEN. Across subgroups, abrocitinib showed greater improvement in EASI-75, PP-NRS4, EASI-90, PP-NRS 0/1, PSAAD and POEM scores versus placebo. Similar results were seen at Week 48. No new safety signals were observed.
Conclusions: prior use of oral systemic or biologic therapies did not seem to impact the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
atopic dermatitis, biologics, eczema, immunomodulatory therapies
753-763
Gooderham, Melinda J.
1eff05f6-55bc-4c0e-a85e-bc2c1ff84f84
Ardern-Jones, Michael R.
7ac43c24-94ab-4d19-ba69-afaa546bec90
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
949deb9a-ccd1-445e-a860-6068cff3977d
Ameen, Mahreen
f4dab601-b6a8-4d6c-8831-dcc16ccc6281
Simpson, Eric L.
2ecb9d6f-70ee-4641-bb84-e16b62d5dd37
Chan, Gary
c4829de7-ca0b-4e81-ab87-91f5553d965d
Biswas, Pinaki
d0cf29b5-1a53-4935-bcf7-f9af82cd0b57
Chiu, Wing S.
ab87d4e0-761c-4355-ae67-0d127e7fb9c5
Watkins, Melissa
a3cf500f-9d32-4ecc-800c-441cdaaeca1a
26 June 2023
Gooderham, Melinda J.
1eff05f6-55bc-4c0e-a85e-bc2c1ff84f84
Ardern-Jones, Michael R.
7ac43c24-94ab-4d19-ba69-afaa546bec90
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
949deb9a-ccd1-445e-a860-6068cff3977d
Ameen, Mahreen
f4dab601-b6a8-4d6c-8831-dcc16ccc6281
Simpson, Eric L.
2ecb9d6f-70ee-4641-bb84-e16b62d5dd37
Chan, Gary
c4829de7-ca0b-4e81-ab87-91f5553d965d
Biswas, Pinaki
d0cf29b5-1a53-4935-bcf7-f9af82cd0b57
Chiu, Wing S.
ab87d4e0-761c-4355-ae67-0d127e7fb9c5
Watkins, Melissa
a3cf500f-9d32-4ecc-800c-441cdaaeca1a
Gooderham, Melinda J., Ardern-Jones, Michael R., Guttman-Yassky, Emma, Ameen, Mahreen, Simpson, Eric L., Chan, Gary, Biswas, Pinaki, Chiu, Wing S. and Watkins, Melissa
(2023)
Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials.
JEADV Clinical Practice, 2 (4), .
(doi:10.1002/jvc2.203).
Abstract
Background: patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapy might require treatment with systemic therapies, including biologics. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in patients who previously received systemic therapies.
Methods: this post hoc analysis included patients receiving abrocitinib (200 mg/100 mg) or placebo in the phase 2b and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 and MONO-2, REGIMEN (abrocitinib 200 mg; open-label period) and EXTEND (patients enrolled from MONO-1 and MONO-2) trials. Patients who were systemic therapy-naive or had received prior oral systemic or biologic therapies were assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement from baseline, ≥75% or ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 or EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), PP-NRS score of 0 or 1 and change from baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores. Safety was assessed.
Results: this analysis included 1579 patients (systemic therapy-naive, n = 997; prior exposure to oral systemic, n = 429; biologic therapies, n = 153). At Week 12, IGA 0/1 response rates (95% confidence intervals) among patients who were systemic therapy-naive, had received prior oral systemic therapy or had received biologic therapy were 44.4% (37.5–51.4), 34.5% (22.3–46.7) and 43.5% (23.2–63.7) with abrocitinib 200 mg, 30.9% (24.2–37.5), 16.4% (7.1–25.7) and 24.1% (8.6–39.7) with abrocitinib 100 mg and 9.6% (4.2–14.9), 5.9% (0.0–13.8) and 0.0% (0.0–23.2) with placebo in the pooled monotherapy trials; and 67.0% (62.8–71.2), 62.2% (56.4–68.0) and 53.5% (42.9–64.0) in REGIMEN. Across subgroups, abrocitinib showed greater improvement in EASI-75, PP-NRS4, EASI-90, PP-NRS 0/1, PSAAD and POEM scores versus placebo. Similar results were seen at Week 48. No new safety signals were observed.
Conclusions: prior use of oral systemic or biologic therapies did not seem to impact the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
Text
JEADV Clinical Practice - 2023 - Gooderham - Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 June 2023
Published date: 26 June 2023
Keywords:
atopic dermatitis, biologics, eczema, immunomodulatory therapies
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490249
PURE UUID: 34c5e9db-879b-4f67-b356-9f837a241240
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 May 2024 16:39
Last modified: 22 May 2024 01:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Melinda J. Gooderham
Author:
Emma Guttman-Yassky
Author:
Mahreen Ameen
Author:
Eric L. Simpson
Author:
Gary Chan
Author:
Pinaki Biswas
Author:
Wing S. Chiu
Author:
Melissa Watkins
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics