The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials

Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials
Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials

Background: patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapy might require treatment with systemic therapies, including biologics. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in patients who previously received systemic therapies. 

Methods: this post hoc analysis included patients receiving abrocitinib (200 mg/100 mg) or placebo in the phase 2b and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 and MONO-2, REGIMEN (abrocitinib 200 mg; open-label period) and EXTEND (patients enrolled from MONO-1 and MONO-2) trials. Patients who were systemic therapy-naive or had received prior oral systemic or biologic therapies were assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement from baseline, ≥75% or ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 or EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), PP-NRS score of 0 or 1 and change from baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores. Safety was assessed. 

Results: this analysis included 1579 patients (systemic therapy-naive, n = 997; prior exposure to oral systemic, n = 429; biologic therapies, n = 153). At Week 12, IGA 0/1 response rates (95% confidence intervals) among patients who were systemic therapy-naive, had received prior oral systemic therapy or had received biologic therapy were 44.4% (37.5–51.4), 34.5% (22.3–46.7) and 43.5% (23.2–63.7) with abrocitinib 200 mg, 30.9% (24.2–37.5), 16.4% (7.1–25.7) and 24.1% (8.6–39.7) with abrocitinib 100 mg and 9.6% (4.2–14.9), 5.9% (0.0–13.8) and 0.0% (0.0–23.2) with placebo in the pooled monotherapy trials; and 67.0% (62.8–71.2), 62.2% (56.4–68.0) and 53.5% (42.9–64.0) in REGIMEN. Across subgroups, abrocitinib showed greater improvement in EASI-75, PP-NRS4, EASI-90, PP-NRS 0/1, PSAAD and POEM scores versus placebo. Similar results were seen at Week 48. No new safety signals were observed. 

Conclusions: prior use of oral systemic or biologic therapies did not seem to impact the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

atopic dermatitis, biologics, eczema, immunomodulatory therapies
753-763
Gooderham, Melinda J.
1eff05f6-55bc-4c0e-a85e-bc2c1ff84f84
Ardern-Jones, Michael R.
7ac43c24-94ab-4d19-ba69-afaa546bec90
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
949deb9a-ccd1-445e-a860-6068cff3977d
Ameen, Mahreen
f4dab601-b6a8-4d6c-8831-dcc16ccc6281
Simpson, Eric L.
2ecb9d6f-70ee-4641-bb84-e16b62d5dd37
Chan, Gary
c4829de7-ca0b-4e81-ab87-91f5553d965d
Biswas, Pinaki
d0cf29b5-1a53-4935-bcf7-f9af82cd0b57
Chiu, Wing S.
ab87d4e0-761c-4355-ae67-0d127e7fb9c5
Watkins, Melissa
a3cf500f-9d32-4ecc-800c-441cdaaeca1a
Gooderham, Melinda J.
1eff05f6-55bc-4c0e-a85e-bc2c1ff84f84
Ardern-Jones, Michael R.
7ac43c24-94ab-4d19-ba69-afaa546bec90
Guttman-Yassky, Emma
949deb9a-ccd1-445e-a860-6068cff3977d
Ameen, Mahreen
f4dab601-b6a8-4d6c-8831-dcc16ccc6281
Simpson, Eric L.
2ecb9d6f-70ee-4641-bb84-e16b62d5dd37
Chan, Gary
c4829de7-ca0b-4e81-ab87-91f5553d965d
Biswas, Pinaki
d0cf29b5-1a53-4935-bcf7-f9af82cd0b57
Chiu, Wing S.
ab87d4e0-761c-4355-ae67-0d127e7fb9c5
Watkins, Melissa
a3cf500f-9d32-4ecc-800c-441cdaaeca1a

Gooderham, Melinda J., Ardern-Jones, Michael R., Guttman-Yassky, Emma, Ameen, Mahreen, Simpson, Eric L., Chan, Gary, Biswas, Pinaki, Chiu, Wing S. and Watkins, Melissa (2023) Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with prior exposure to oral systemic immunosuppressants or biologic therapies: a post hoc analysis of the JADE clinical trials. JEADV Clinical Practice, 2 (4), 753-763. (doi:10.1002/jvc2.203).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapy might require treatment with systemic therapies, including biologics. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib monotherapy in patients who previously received systemic therapies. 

Methods: this post hoc analysis included patients receiving abrocitinib (200 mg/100 mg) or placebo in the phase 2b and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 and MONO-2, REGIMEN (abrocitinib 200 mg; open-label period) and EXTEND (patients enrolled from MONO-1 and MONO-2) trials. Patients who were systemic therapy-naive or had received prior oral systemic or biologic therapies were assessed for Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement from baseline, ≥75% or ≥90% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75 or EASI-90), ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), PP-NRS score of 0 or 1 and change from baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) scores. Safety was assessed. 

Results: this analysis included 1579 patients (systemic therapy-naive, n = 997; prior exposure to oral systemic, n = 429; biologic therapies, n = 153). At Week 12, IGA 0/1 response rates (95% confidence intervals) among patients who were systemic therapy-naive, had received prior oral systemic therapy or had received biologic therapy were 44.4% (37.5–51.4), 34.5% (22.3–46.7) and 43.5% (23.2–63.7) with abrocitinib 200 mg, 30.9% (24.2–37.5), 16.4% (7.1–25.7) and 24.1% (8.6–39.7) with abrocitinib 100 mg and 9.6% (4.2–14.9), 5.9% (0.0–13.8) and 0.0% (0.0–23.2) with placebo in the pooled monotherapy trials; and 67.0% (62.8–71.2), 62.2% (56.4–68.0) and 53.5% (42.9–64.0) in REGIMEN. Across subgroups, abrocitinib showed greater improvement in EASI-75, PP-NRS4, EASI-90, PP-NRS 0/1, PSAAD and POEM scores versus placebo. Similar results were seen at Week 48. No new safety signals were observed. 

Conclusions: prior use of oral systemic or biologic therapies did not seem to impact the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Text
JEADV Clinical Practice - 2023 - Gooderham - Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 9 June 2023
Published date: 26 June 2023
Keywords: atopic dermatitis, biologics, eczema, immunomodulatory therapies

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490249
PURE UUID: 34c5e9db-879b-4f67-b356-9f837a241240
ORCID for Michael R. Ardern-Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-2016

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 May 2024 16:39
Last modified: 22 May 2024 01:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Melinda J. Gooderham
Author: Emma Guttman-Yassky
Author: Mahreen Ameen
Author: Eric L. Simpson
Author: Gary Chan
Author: Pinaki Biswas
Author: Wing S. Chiu
Author: Melissa Watkins

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×