The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How to select participants from LGBTQIA+ and trans communities using social media

How to select participants from LGBTQIA+ and trans communities using social media
How to select participants from LGBTQIA+ and trans communities using social media
In this guide, I discuss some of the ethical and methodological considerations of recruiting LGBTQIA+ research participants via social media. Of course, recruiting research participants from historically marginalized and minoritized communities always requires serious consideration. However, this is perhaps even more true when seeking to recruit participants via today’s increasingly extreme social mediascape, which continues to platform homophobic, transphobic, and queerphobic content. These conditions may well contribute to social media users’ inability or unwillingness to be identifiably LGBTQIA+ in online spaces, giving rise to both ethical and methodological considerations in our research. From researcher positionality to picking the right platform(s), and from carefully crafted language to dealing with rejection, I offer in this guide some practical advice for you to reflect on in the development and design of social media recruitment methods.

Webster, Lexi
73920a7c-4aac-4188-81fb-b604c1dac45c
Webster, Lexi
73920a7c-4aac-4188-81fb-b604c1dac45c

Webster, Lexi (2024) How to select participants from LGBTQIA+ and trans communities using social media. In, SAGE Research Methods: Diversifying and Decolonizing Research. (doi:10.4135/9781529690958).

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

In this guide, I discuss some of the ethical and methodological considerations of recruiting LGBTQIA+ research participants via social media. Of course, recruiting research participants from historically marginalized and minoritized communities always requires serious consideration. However, this is perhaps even more true when seeking to recruit participants via today’s increasingly extreme social mediascape, which continues to platform homophobic, transphobic, and queerphobic content. These conditions may well contribute to social media users’ inability or unwillingness to be identifiably LGBTQIA+ in online spaces, giving rise to both ethical and methodological considerations in our research. From researcher positionality to picking the right platform(s), and from carefully crafted language to dealing with rejection, I offer in this guide some practical advice for you to reflect on in the development and design of social media recruitment methods.

Text
Webster.FirstDraft.RecruitLGBTQIA+ - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 21 March 2026.
Available under License Other.
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 21 March 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490345
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490345
PURE UUID: 5b8fa314-8848-47c2-ba80-4d13cf70adff
ORCID for Lexi Webster: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5721-8236

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 May 2024 16:59
Last modified: 24 May 2024 02:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lexi Webster ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×