Systemic antibiotics for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults
Systemic antibiotics for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults
Background: dental pain can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess are common causes of dental pain and arise from an inflamed or necrotic dental pulp, or infection of the pulpless root canal system. Clinical guidelines recommend that the first‐line treatment for these conditions should be removal of the source of inflammation or infection by local operative measures, and that systemic antibiotics are currently only recommended for situations where there is evidence of spreading infection (cellulitis, lymph node involvement, diffuse swelling) or systemic involvement (fever, malaise). Despite this, there is evidence that dentists frequently prescribe antibiotics in the absence of these signs. There is concern that this could contribute to the development of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria. This review is the second update of the original version first published in 2014.
Objectives: to evaluate the effects of systemic antibiotics provided with or without surgical intervention (such as extraction, incision and drainage of a swelling, or endodontic treatment), with or without analgesics, for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults.
Search methods: we searched Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (26 February 2018 (discontinued)), CENTRAL (2022, Issue 10), MEDLINE Ovid (23 November 2022), Embase Ovid (23 November 2022), CINAHL EBSCO (25 November 2022) and two trials registries, and performed a grey literature search. There were no restrictions on language or date of publication.
Selection criteria: randomised controlled trials of systemic antibiotics in adults with a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess, with or without surgical intervention (considered in this situation to be extraction, incision and drainage, or endodontic treatment) and with or without analgesics.
Data collection and analysis: two review authors independently screened the results of the searches against inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used a fixed‐effect model in the meta‐analysis as there were fewer than four studies. We contacted study authors to request missing information. We used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.
Main results: there was one new completed trial on this topic since the last update in 2018. In total, we included three trials with 134 participants.
Systemic antibiotics versus placebo with surgical intervention and analgesics for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess
One trial (72 participants) compared the effects of a single preoperative dose of clindamycin versus a matched placebo when provided with a surgical intervention (endodontic chemo‐mechanical debridement and filling) and analgesics to adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis. We assessed this study at low risk of bias. There were no differences in participant‐reported pain or swelling across trial arms at any time point assessed. The median values for pain (numerical rating scale 0 to 10) were 3.0 in both groups at 24 hours (P = 0.219); 1.0 in the antibiotic group versus 2.0 in the control group at 48 hours (P = 0.242); and 0 in both groups at 72 hours and seven days (P = 0.116 and 0.673, respectively). The risk ratio of swelling when comparing preoperative antibiotic to placebo was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 2.56; P = 0.41). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes in this comparison was low.
Two trials (62 participants) compared the effects of a seven‐day course of oral phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin VK) versus a matched placebo when provided with a surgical intervention (total or partial endodontic chemo‐mechanical debridement) and analgesics to adults with acute apical abscess or symptomatic necrotic tooth. Participants in both trials also received oral analgesics. We assessed one study at high risk of bias and the other at unclear risk of bias. There were no differences in participant‐reported pain or swelling at any time point assessed. The mean difference for pain (short ordinal numerical scale 0 to 3, where 0 was no pain) was −0.03 (95% CI −0.53 to 0.47) at 24 hours; 0.32 (95% CI −0.22 to 0.86) at 48 hours; and 0.08 (95% CI −0.38 to 0.54) at 72 hours. The standardised mean difference for swelling was 0.27 (95% CI −0.23 to 0.78) at 24 hours; 0.04 (95% CI −0.47 to 0.55) at 48 hours; and 0.02 (95% CI −0.49 to 0.52) at 72 hours. The certainty of evidence for all the outcomes in this comparison was very low.
Adverse effects, as reported in two studies, were diarrhoea (one participant in the placebo group), fatigue and reduced energy postoperatively (one participant in the antibiotic group) and dizziness preoperatively (one participant in the antibiotic group).
Systemic antibiotics without surgical intervention for adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess
We found no studies that compared the effects of systemic antibiotics with a matched placebo delivered without a surgical intervention for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults.
Authors' conclusions: the evidence suggests that preoperative clindamycin for adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis results in little to no difference in participant‐reported pain or swelling at any of the time points included in this review when provided with chemo‐mechanical endodontic debridement and filling under local anaesthesia. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of postoperative phenoxymethylpenicillin for adults with localised apical abscess or a symptomatic necrotic tooth when provided with chemo‐mechanical debridement and oral analgesics. We found no studies which compared the effects of systemic antibiotics with a matched placebo delivered without a surgical intervention for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults.
Acute Disease, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use, Bias, Drainage, Humans, Periapical Abscess/drug therapy, Periapical Periodontitis/drug therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Toothache/drug therapy
Cope, Anwen L.
e4f0a157-0f4f-4e30-b02e-f1037df72135
Francis, Nick
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Wood, Fiona
fc0b6a76-2928-4bda-aafc-2be3ac74446b
Thompson, Wendy
862e2055-9fae-49ef-aad5-4b9da3eb19f9
Chestnutt, Ivor G.
9e5aa7b4-0d23-443d-bb53-08dd5703ba37
7 May 2024
Cope, Anwen L.
e4f0a157-0f4f-4e30-b02e-f1037df72135
Francis, Nick
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Wood, Fiona
fc0b6a76-2928-4bda-aafc-2be3ac74446b
Thompson, Wendy
862e2055-9fae-49ef-aad5-4b9da3eb19f9
Chestnutt, Ivor G.
9e5aa7b4-0d23-443d-bb53-08dd5703ba37
Cope, Anwen L., Francis, Nick, Wood, Fiona, Thompson, Wendy and Chestnutt, Ivor G.
(2024)
Systemic antibiotics for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024 (5), [CD010136].
(doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010136.pub4).
Abstract
Background: dental pain can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess are common causes of dental pain and arise from an inflamed or necrotic dental pulp, or infection of the pulpless root canal system. Clinical guidelines recommend that the first‐line treatment for these conditions should be removal of the source of inflammation or infection by local operative measures, and that systemic antibiotics are currently only recommended for situations where there is evidence of spreading infection (cellulitis, lymph node involvement, diffuse swelling) or systemic involvement (fever, malaise). Despite this, there is evidence that dentists frequently prescribe antibiotics in the absence of these signs. There is concern that this could contribute to the development of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria. This review is the second update of the original version first published in 2014.
Objectives: to evaluate the effects of systemic antibiotics provided with or without surgical intervention (such as extraction, incision and drainage of a swelling, or endodontic treatment), with or without analgesics, for symptomatic apical periodontitis and acute apical abscess in adults.
Search methods: we searched Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register (26 February 2018 (discontinued)), CENTRAL (2022, Issue 10), MEDLINE Ovid (23 November 2022), Embase Ovid (23 November 2022), CINAHL EBSCO (25 November 2022) and two trials registries, and performed a grey literature search. There were no restrictions on language or date of publication.
Selection criteria: randomised controlled trials of systemic antibiotics in adults with a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess, with or without surgical intervention (considered in this situation to be extraction, incision and drainage, or endodontic treatment) and with or without analgesics.
Data collection and analysis: two review authors independently screened the results of the searches against inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used a fixed‐effect model in the meta‐analysis as there were fewer than four studies. We contacted study authors to request missing information. We used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.
Main results: there was one new completed trial on this topic since the last update in 2018. In total, we included three trials with 134 participants.
Systemic antibiotics versus placebo with surgical intervention and analgesics for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess
One trial (72 participants) compared the effects of a single preoperative dose of clindamycin versus a matched placebo when provided with a surgical intervention (endodontic chemo‐mechanical debridement and filling) and analgesics to adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis. We assessed this study at low risk of bias. There were no differences in participant‐reported pain or swelling across trial arms at any time point assessed. The median values for pain (numerical rating scale 0 to 10) were 3.0 in both groups at 24 hours (P = 0.219); 1.0 in the antibiotic group versus 2.0 in the control group at 48 hours (P = 0.242); and 0 in both groups at 72 hours and seven days (P = 0.116 and 0.673, respectively). The risk ratio of swelling when comparing preoperative antibiotic to placebo was 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 2.56; P = 0.41). The certainty of evidence for all outcomes in this comparison was low.
Two trials (62 participants) compared the effects of a seven‐day course of oral phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin VK) versus a matched placebo when provided with a surgical intervention (total or partial endodontic chemo‐mechanical debridement) and analgesics to adults with acute apical abscess or symptomatic necrotic tooth. Participants in both trials also received oral analgesics. We assessed one study at high risk of bias and the other at unclear risk of bias. There were no differences in participant‐reported pain or swelling at any time point assessed. The mean difference for pain (short ordinal numerical scale 0 to 3, where 0 was no pain) was −0.03 (95% CI −0.53 to 0.47) at 24 hours; 0.32 (95% CI −0.22 to 0.86) at 48 hours; and 0.08 (95% CI −0.38 to 0.54) at 72 hours. The standardised mean difference for swelling was 0.27 (95% CI −0.23 to 0.78) at 24 hours; 0.04 (95% CI −0.47 to 0.55) at 48 hours; and 0.02 (95% CI −0.49 to 0.52) at 72 hours. The certainty of evidence for all the outcomes in this comparison was very low.
Adverse effects, as reported in two studies, were diarrhoea (one participant in the placebo group), fatigue and reduced energy postoperatively (one participant in the antibiotic group) and dizziness preoperatively (one participant in the antibiotic group).
Systemic antibiotics without surgical intervention for adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess
We found no studies that compared the effects of systemic antibiotics with a matched placebo delivered without a surgical intervention for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults.
Authors' conclusions: the evidence suggests that preoperative clindamycin for adults with symptomatic apical periodontitis results in little to no difference in participant‐reported pain or swelling at any of the time points included in this review when provided with chemo‐mechanical endodontic debridement and filling under local anaesthesia. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of postoperative phenoxymethylpenicillin for adults with localised apical abscess or a symptomatic necrotic tooth when provided with chemo‐mechanical debridement and oral analgesics. We found no studies which compared the effects of systemic antibiotics with a matched placebo delivered without a surgical intervention for symptomatic apical periodontitis or acute apical abscess in adults.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 7 May 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:
Acute Disease, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use, Bias, Drainage, Humans, Periapical Abscess/drug therapy, Periapical Periodontitis/drug therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Toothache/drug therapy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490374
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490374
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: 74f456a4-de9f-4ac8-895c-59433ac043ce
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 May 2024 16:30
Last modified: 13 Jul 2024 02:00
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Anwen L. Cope
Author:
Fiona Wood
Author:
Wendy Thompson
Author:
Ivor G. Chestnutt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics