The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Methylphenidate Versus Placebo for Treating Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Methylphenidate Versus Placebo for Treating Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Methylphenidate Versus Placebo for Treating Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: To compare effects and side effects of 6 weeks of individually dose-titrated methylphenidate or placebo on fatigue in palliative care patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Eligible patients had advanced incurable cancer and fatigue >3/10. Principal exclusions were hypertension; psychiatric, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal, liver, or blood disorders; substance dependency; and epilepsy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 methylphenidate or placebo starting at 5 mg twice daily. Dose of methylphenidate/placebo was titrated once per week, over 6 weeks, up to a maximum of 20 mg three times daily. Trial ended at 10 weeks. Primary outcome was the difference in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores between groups at 6 ± 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, quality of life, and mood.

RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients (73 men; mean, 65.8; standard deviation [SD], 10.3 years) were randomly assigned, and three were excluded from analysis. Seventy-seven were allocated placebo (baseline FACIT-F = 22 [SD, 10]); 82 were allocated methylphenidate (FACIT-F = 20 [SD, 9]). After 6 ± 2 weeks, FACIT-F scores were 1.97 points (95% CI, -0.95 to 4.90; P = .186) higher (better) on methylphenidate than placebo. Across 10 weeks of the study, FACIT-F was nominally higher in the methylphenidate group versus placebo (Diff, 2.20 [95% CI, 0.39 to 4.01]), but this did not reach the minimally clinically important difference (5-points). At 6 weeks, there were no differences between groups in quality-of-life or symptom domains except for depression scores (nominally reduced in the methylphenidate group: Diff, -1.35 [95% CI, -2.41 to -0.30]). There were no differences in mortality or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION: After 6 ± 2 weeks of treatment, methylphenidate was not superior to placebo for treating fatigue in advanced cancer. Methylphenidate was safe and well-tolerated.

Aged, Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use, Double-Blind Method, Fatigue/drug therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate/therapeutic use, Middle Aged, Neoplasms/complications, Palliative Care/methods, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome
1527-7755
2382-2392
Stone, Patrick Charles
8bf27922-30f3-4536-a912-60f1519fda4f
Minton, Ollie
67220849-ee0e-4b3d-89f6-9ad96a168d84
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Buckle, Peter
3fe48da8-4794-4285-aae0-e3aaab99ede3
Enayat, Zinat E.
bc78ccff-57a9-4d48-95d9-ad336c7f873b
Marston, Louise
258cc87f-2cf7-49de-9498-fc659a5ffde7
Freemantle, Nick
8182a4ad-e20e-4aea-b5f7-62b170845d1e
Stone, Patrick Charles
8bf27922-30f3-4536-a912-60f1519fda4f
Minton, Ollie
67220849-ee0e-4b3d-89f6-9ad96a168d84
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Buckle, Peter
3fe48da8-4794-4285-aae0-e3aaab99ede3
Enayat, Zinat E.
bc78ccff-57a9-4d48-95d9-ad336c7f873b
Marston, Louise
258cc87f-2cf7-49de-9498-fc659a5ffde7
Freemantle, Nick
8182a4ad-e20e-4aea-b5f7-62b170845d1e

Stone, Patrick Charles, Minton, Ollie, Richardson, Alison, Buckle, Peter, Enayat, Zinat E., Marston, Louise and Freemantle, Nick (2024) Methylphenidate Versus Placebo for Treating Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 42 (20), 2382-2392. (doi:10.1200/JCO.23.02639).

Record type: Article

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare effects and side effects of 6 weeks of individually dose-titrated methylphenidate or placebo on fatigue in palliative care patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Eligible patients had advanced incurable cancer and fatigue >3/10. Principal exclusions were hypertension; psychiatric, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal, liver, or blood disorders; substance dependency; and epilepsy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 methylphenidate or placebo starting at 5 mg twice daily. Dose of methylphenidate/placebo was titrated once per week, over 6 weeks, up to a maximum of 20 mg three times daily. Trial ended at 10 weeks. Primary outcome was the difference in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores between groups at 6 ± 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, quality of life, and mood.

RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients (73 men; mean, 65.8; standard deviation [SD], 10.3 years) were randomly assigned, and three were excluded from analysis. Seventy-seven were allocated placebo (baseline FACIT-F = 22 [SD, 10]); 82 were allocated methylphenidate (FACIT-F = 20 [SD, 9]). After 6 ± 2 weeks, FACIT-F scores were 1.97 points (95% CI, -0.95 to 4.90; P = .186) higher (better) on methylphenidate than placebo. Across 10 weeks of the study, FACIT-F was nominally higher in the methylphenidate group versus placebo (Diff, 2.20 [95% CI, 0.39 to 4.01]), but this did not reach the minimally clinically important difference (5-points). At 6 weeks, there were no differences between groups in quality-of-life or symptom domains except for depression scores (nominally reduced in the methylphenidate group: Diff, -1.35 [95% CI, -2.41 to -0.30]). There were no differences in mortality or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION: After 6 ± 2 weeks of treatment, methylphenidate was not superior to placebo for treating fatigue in advanced cancer. Methylphenidate was safe and well-tolerated.

Text
stone-et-al-2024-methylphenidate-versus-placebo-for-treating-fatigue-in-patients-with-advanced-cancer-randomized-double - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (452kB)
Text
Editorial JCO chin-yee-et-al-2024-putting-methylphenidate-for-cancer-related-fatigue-to-rest
Download (226kB)
Text
Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO) Podcast
Download (504kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 February 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 May 2024
Published date: 10 July 2024
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Keywords: Aged, Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use, Double-Blind Method, Fatigue/drug therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate/therapeutic use, Middle Aged, Neoplasms/complications, Palliative Care/methods, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490433
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490433
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: 7711a0b9-c883-4059-a4a3-d2e770891312
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 May 2024 16:38
Last modified: 20 Jul 2024 01:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Patrick Charles Stone
Author: Ollie Minton
Author: Peter Buckle
Author: Zinat E. Enayat
Author: Louise Marston
Author: Nick Freemantle

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×