Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019: systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification
Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019: systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification
This paper is dedicated to exploring the NASA Langley Challenge on Optimization under Uncertainty by proposing a series of approaches for both forward and inverse treatment of uncertainty propagation and quantification. The primary effort is placed on the categorization of the subproblems as to be forward or inverse procedures, such that dedicated techniques are proposed for the two directions, respectively. The sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis are categorized as forward procedures, while modal calibration & uncertainty reduction, reliability-based optimization, and risk-based design are regarded as inverse procedures. For both directions, the overall approach is based on imprecise probability characterization where both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are investigated for the inputs, and consequently, the output is described as the probability-box (P-box). Theoretic development is focused on the definition of comprehensive uncertainty quantification criteria from limited and irregular time-domain observations to extract as much as possible uncertainty information, which will be significant for the inverse procedure to refine uncertainty models. Furthermore, a decoupling approach is proposed to investigate the P-box along two directions such that the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are decoupled, and thus a two-loop procedure is designed to propagate both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties through the systematic model. The key for successfully addressing this challenge is in obtaining on the balance among an appropriate hypothesis of the input uncertainty model, a comprehensive criterion of output uncertainty quantification, and a computational viable approach for both forward and inverse uncertainty treatment.
NASA Challenge, Reliability analysis, Reliability-based optimization, Risk-based design, Uncertainty propagation, Uncertainty quantification
Bi, Sifeng
93deb24b-fda1-4b18-927b-6225976d8d3f
He, Kui
eb773930-5a33-4187-8e81-bfe99159fdf4
Zhao, Yanlin
cce04b48-2ab9-4a0d-83c4-50870b2b262e
Moens, David
d6b444c4-8114-4135-9720-d35bb674b8fe
Beer, Michael
e44760ce-70c0-44f2-bb18-7197ba142788
Zhang, Jingrui
afac4b75-2f8f-4a16-b22d-d76f4769d9d9
2 September 2021
Bi, Sifeng
93deb24b-fda1-4b18-927b-6225976d8d3f
He, Kui
eb773930-5a33-4187-8e81-bfe99159fdf4
Zhao, Yanlin
cce04b48-2ab9-4a0d-83c4-50870b2b262e
Moens, David
d6b444c4-8114-4135-9720-d35bb674b8fe
Beer, Michael
e44760ce-70c0-44f2-bb18-7197ba142788
Zhang, Jingrui
afac4b75-2f8f-4a16-b22d-d76f4769d9d9
Bi, Sifeng, He, Kui, Zhao, Yanlin, Moens, David, Beer, Michael and Zhang, Jingrui
(2021)
Towards the NASA UQ Challenge 2019: systematically forward and inverse approaches for uncertainty propagation and quantification.
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 165, [108387].
(doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108387).
Abstract
This paper is dedicated to exploring the NASA Langley Challenge on Optimization under Uncertainty by proposing a series of approaches for both forward and inverse treatment of uncertainty propagation and quantification. The primary effort is placed on the categorization of the subproblems as to be forward or inverse procedures, such that dedicated techniques are proposed for the two directions, respectively. The sensitivity analysis and reliability analysis are categorized as forward procedures, while modal calibration & uncertainty reduction, reliability-based optimization, and risk-based design are regarded as inverse procedures. For both directions, the overall approach is based on imprecise probability characterization where both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are investigated for the inputs, and consequently, the output is described as the probability-box (P-box). Theoretic development is focused on the definition of comprehensive uncertainty quantification criteria from limited and irregular time-domain observations to extract as much as possible uncertainty information, which will be significant for the inverse procedure to refine uncertainty models. Furthermore, a decoupling approach is proposed to investigate the P-box along two directions such that the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are decoupled, and thus a two-loop procedure is designed to propagate both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties through the systematic model. The key for successfully addressing this challenge is in obtaining on the balance among an appropriate hypothesis of the input uncertainty model, a comprehensive criterion of output uncertainty quantification, and a computational viable approach for both forward and inverse uncertainty treatment.
Text
Pre-print_NASA_Challenge2019_Sifeng_Bi2022
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 21 August 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 September 2021
Published date: 2 September 2021
Keywords:
NASA Challenge, Reliability analysis, Reliability-based optimization, Risk-based design, Uncertainty propagation, Uncertainty quantification
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490436
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490436
ISSN: 0888-3270
PURE UUID: 6e7d61c7-d771-475b-8e8a-e4479d8df352
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 May 2024 16:42
Last modified: 01 Jun 2024 02:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sifeng Bi
Author:
Kui He
Author:
Yanlin Zhao
Author:
David Moens
Author:
Michael Beer
Author:
Jingrui Zhang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics