Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity
Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity
Assessing habitat loss effects on biodiversity is a major focus of ecological research. The relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity, postulated in the habitat amount hypothesis, is usually assessed at one point in time, which does not account for habitat loss as a temporal process. We examined habitat amount effects at two time periods, 1930s and 2010s, using plant data from three semi-natural habitats: calcareous grassland, heathland and broadleaved woodland, across Dorset, southern England. Woodlands, which changed little in area over the time period, showed minimal effects of habitat amount on species occurrence in both time periods. For grassland and heathland, which had undergone severe losses over the study period, we found the expected positive relationship in the 2010s, but the relationship was negative for these habitats in the 1930s. We explored possible reasons for this result. Total perimeter-to-area ratio (TPAR) showed positive effects in the 1930s for grassland and heathland, suggesting effects of habitat configuration, specifically edge. However, TPAR was highly correlated with habitat amount so this finding is speculative. One possible explanation for the relationships with habitat amount, and the change between the two periods could be the quality of the surrounding matrix. In the 1930s, the landscape was less intensified and was dominated by semi-natural habitats, whereas by the 2010s much had been converted to arable and intensive grasslands. We speculate that species could likely utilise the matrix to a greater degree in the 1930s compared with the 2010s when the matrix was more hostile, thereby decreasing the importance of habitat amount in the 1930s compared with the 2010s. These findings have important implications for conservation, as they show the importance of context (i.e. matrix quality) in determining the relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity.
Ridding, Lucy E.
f1c7c0f3-24d3-47ba-bcc9-d837d855e6cd
Spake, Rebecca
1cda8ad0-2ab2-45d9-a844-ec3d8be2786a
Newton, Adrian C.
f73290c2-5ed9-470a-8d98-7ad5714b87db
Keith, Sally A.
972baf00-7663-426f-90cd-11a10397e16f
Walls, Robin M.
3df693c2-22e9-4e89-9f2c-c9b7ec1fe83c
Diaz, Anita
415294c1-7d90-4dcb-a074-23909f94b4d8
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Bullock, James M.
b5ac66ae-f850-48eb-8c59-f3a58bf7c0b6
15 December 2022
Ridding, Lucy E.
f1c7c0f3-24d3-47ba-bcc9-d837d855e6cd
Spake, Rebecca
1cda8ad0-2ab2-45d9-a844-ec3d8be2786a
Newton, Adrian C.
f73290c2-5ed9-470a-8d98-7ad5714b87db
Keith, Sally A.
972baf00-7663-426f-90cd-11a10397e16f
Walls, Robin M.
3df693c2-22e9-4e89-9f2c-c9b7ec1fe83c
Diaz, Anita
415294c1-7d90-4dcb-a074-23909f94b4d8
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Bullock, James M.
b5ac66ae-f850-48eb-8c59-f3a58bf7c0b6
Ridding, Lucy E., Spake, Rebecca, Newton, Adrian C., Keith, Sally A., Walls, Robin M., Diaz, Anita, Eigenbrod, Felix and Bullock, James M.
(2022)
Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity.
Ecography.
(doi:10.1111/ecog.06301).
Abstract
Assessing habitat loss effects on biodiversity is a major focus of ecological research. The relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity, postulated in the habitat amount hypothesis, is usually assessed at one point in time, which does not account for habitat loss as a temporal process. We examined habitat amount effects at two time periods, 1930s and 2010s, using plant data from three semi-natural habitats: calcareous grassland, heathland and broadleaved woodland, across Dorset, southern England. Woodlands, which changed little in area over the time period, showed minimal effects of habitat amount on species occurrence in both time periods. For grassland and heathland, which had undergone severe losses over the study period, we found the expected positive relationship in the 2010s, but the relationship was negative for these habitats in the 1930s. We explored possible reasons for this result. Total perimeter-to-area ratio (TPAR) showed positive effects in the 1930s for grassland and heathland, suggesting effects of habitat configuration, specifically edge. However, TPAR was highly correlated with habitat amount so this finding is speculative. One possible explanation for the relationships with habitat amount, and the change between the two periods could be the quality of the surrounding matrix. In the 1930s, the landscape was less intensified and was dominated by semi-natural habitats, whereas by the 2010s much had been converted to arable and intensive grasslands. We speculate that species could likely utilise the matrix to a greater degree in the 1930s compared with the 2010s when the matrix was more hostile, thereby decreasing the importance of habitat amount in the 1930s compared with the 2010s. These findings have important implications for conservation, as they show the importance of context (i.e. matrix quality) in determining the relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity.
Text
Ecography - 2022 - Ridding - Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 31 October 2022
Published date: 15 December 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490484
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490484
ISSN: 0906-7590
PURE UUID: 6e5f2b6e-fa5b-440a-849c-88480e1ee3c9
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 May 2024 17:05
Last modified: 29 May 2024 01:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lucy E. Ridding
Author:
Adrian C. Newton
Author:
Sally A. Keith
Author:
Robin M. Walls
Author:
Anita Diaz
Author:
James M. Bullock
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics