The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity

Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity
Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity
Assessing habitat loss effects on biodiversity is a major focus of ecological research. The relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity, postulated in the habitat amount hypothesis, is usually assessed at one point in time, which does not account for habitat loss as a temporal process. We examined habitat amount effects at two time periods, 1930s and 2010s, using plant data from three semi-natural habitats: calcareous grassland, heathland and broadleaved woodland, across Dorset, southern England. Woodlands, which changed little in area over the time period, showed minimal effects of habitat amount on species occurrence in both time periods. For grassland and heathland, which had undergone severe losses over the study period, we found the expected positive relationship in the 2010s, but the relationship was negative for these habitats in the 1930s. We explored possible reasons for this result. Total perimeter-to-area ratio (TPAR) showed positive effects in the 1930s for grassland and heathland, suggesting effects of habitat configuration, specifically edge. However, TPAR was highly correlated with habitat amount so this finding is speculative. One possible explanation for the relationships with habitat amount, and the change between the two periods could be the quality of the surrounding matrix. In the 1930s, the landscape was less intensified and was dominated by semi-natural habitats, whereas by the 2010s much had been converted to arable and intensive grasslands. We speculate that species could likely utilise the matrix to a greater degree in the 1930s compared with the 2010s when the matrix was more hostile, thereby decreasing the importance of habitat amount in the 1930s compared with the 2010s. These findings have important implications for conservation, as they show the importance of context (i.e. matrix quality) in determining the relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity.
0906-7590
Ridding, Lucy E.
f1c7c0f3-24d3-47ba-bcc9-d837d855e6cd
Spake, Rebecca
1cda8ad0-2ab2-45d9-a844-ec3d8be2786a
Newton, Adrian C.
f73290c2-5ed9-470a-8d98-7ad5714b87db
Keith, Sally A.
972baf00-7663-426f-90cd-11a10397e16f
Walls, Robin M.
3df693c2-22e9-4e89-9f2c-c9b7ec1fe83c
Diaz, Anita
415294c1-7d90-4dcb-a074-23909f94b4d8
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Bullock, James M.
b5ac66ae-f850-48eb-8c59-f3a58bf7c0b6
Ridding, Lucy E.
f1c7c0f3-24d3-47ba-bcc9-d837d855e6cd
Spake, Rebecca
1cda8ad0-2ab2-45d9-a844-ec3d8be2786a
Newton, Adrian C.
f73290c2-5ed9-470a-8d98-7ad5714b87db
Keith, Sally A.
972baf00-7663-426f-90cd-11a10397e16f
Walls, Robin M.
3df693c2-22e9-4e89-9f2c-c9b7ec1fe83c
Diaz, Anita
415294c1-7d90-4dcb-a074-23909f94b4d8
Eigenbrod, Felix
43efc6ae-b129-45a2-8a34-e489b5f05827
Bullock, James M.
b5ac66ae-f850-48eb-8c59-f3a58bf7c0b6

Ridding, Lucy E., Spake, Rebecca, Newton, Adrian C., Keith, Sally A., Walls, Robin M., Diaz, Anita, Eigenbrod, Felix and Bullock, James M. (2022) Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity. Ecography. (doi:10.1111/ecog.06301).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Assessing habitat loss effects on biodiversity is a major focus of ecological research. The relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity, postulated in the habitat amount hypothesis, is usually assessed at one point in time, which does not account for habitat loss as a temporal process. We examined habitat amount effects at two time periods, 1930s and 2010s, using plant data from three semi-natural habitats: calcareous grassland, heathland and broadleaved woodland, across Dorset, southern England. Woodlands, which changed little in area over the time period, showed minimal effects of habitat amount on species occurrence in both time periods. For grassland and heathland, which had undergone severe losses over the study period, we found the expected positive relationship in the 2010s, but the relationship was negative for these habitats in the 1930s. We explored possible reasons for this result. Total perimeter-to-area ratio (TPAR) showed positive effects in the 1930s for grassland and heathland, suggesting effects of habitat configuration, specifically edge. However, TPAR was highly correlated with habitat amount so this finding is speculative. One possible explanation for the relationships with habitat amount, and the change between the two periods could be the quality of the surrounding matrix. In the 1930s, the landscape was less intensified and was dominated by semi-natural habitats, whereas by the 2010s much had been converted to arable and intensive grasslands. We speculate that species could likely utilise the matrix to a greater degree in the 1930s compared with the 2010s when the matrix was more hostile, thereby decreasing the importance of habitat amount in the 1930s compared with the 2010s. These findings have important implications for conservation, as they show the importance of context (i.e. matrix quality) in determining the relationship between habitat amount and biodiversity.

Text
Ecography - 2022 - Ridding - Historical data reveal contrasting habitat amount relationships with plant biodiversity - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 October 2022
Published date: 15 December 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490484
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490484
ISSN: 0906-7590
PURE UUID: 6e5f2b6e-fa5b-440a-849c-88480e1ee3c9
ORCID for Felix Eigenbrod: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8982-824X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 May 2024 17:05
Last modified: 29 May 2024 01:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lucy E. Ridding
Author: Rebecca Spake
Author: Adrian C. Newton
Author: Sally A. Keith
Author: Robin M. Walls
Author: Anita Diaz
Author: Felix Eigenbrod ORCID iD
Author: James M. Bullock

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×