The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard

Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard
Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard
We are grateful to ten Kate & von Hase (2016) and Dempsey & Collard (2016) for their insightful and constructive responses to our article on biodiversity offsetting (Apostolopoulou & Adams, 2015a). They agree with us that conservationists need to think very carefully about offsetting and its implications for nature conservation. They differ substantially in where that thinking should lead. Ten Kate & von Hase believe that offsetting is fine if it is done properly. Dempsey & Collard are profoundly uneasy about its implications, and go deeper into the way conservation is folded into economic development, ‘smoothing the way for new industrial scale projects’.

0030-6053
40-42
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
e30e62ad-7e3c-4744-9929-261187c19b04
Adams, William M.
dfb6e430-7d11-4566-bfd7-a0bd4d55a793
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
e30e62ad-7e3c-4744-9929-261187c19b04
Adams, William M.
dfb6e430-7d11-4566-bfd7-a0bd4d55a793

Apostolopoulou, Evangelia and Adams, William M. (2016) Biodiversity offsetting and the reframing of conservation: a reply to ten Kate & von Hase and Dempsey & Collard. Oryx, 51 (1), 40-42. (doi:10.1017/S0030605316001332).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We are grateful to ten Kate & von Hase (2016) and Dempsey & Collard (2016) for their insightful and constructive responses to our article on biodiversity offsetting (Apostolopoulou & Adams, 2015a). They agree with us that conservationists need to think very carefully about offsetting and its implications for nature conservation. They differ substantially in where that thinking should lead. Ten Kate & von Hase believe that offsetting is fine if it is done properly. Dempsey & Collard are profoundly uneasy about its implications, and go deeper into the way conservation is folded into economic development, ‘smoothing the way for new industrial scale projects’.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 21 November 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490565
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490565
ISSN: 0030-6053
PURE UUID: 05bdcdb3-6b7b-49d3-a7c6-49fc475b614c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 May 2024 16:49
Last modified: 01 Jun 2024 02:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Evangelia Apostolopoulou
Author: William M. Adams

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×