Cutting nature to fit: urbanization, neoliberalism and biodiversity offsetting in England
Cutting nature to fit: urbanization, neoliberalism and biodiversity offsetting in England
In this paper, by drawing on primary empirical data obtained through 62 interviews in seven case studies we seek to offer a Marxist historical-geographical analysis of biodiversity offsetting policy in England, and its emergence in the context of the global economic crisis, and government aspirations for large-scale urban development projects. By paying attention to the interplay between offsetting, urbanization and the neoliberal reconstruction of conservation, we aim to extend the focus of the neoliberal conservation literature from the role of offsets as ecological ‘commodities’ to the way offsetting is used to support the production of space(s), place(s) and nature(s) in line with contemporary patterns of capitalist urban growth. In particular, we show how offsetting operationalized new ideas about nature as a stock of biodiversity, how it streamlined planning to support extended urbanization, how it foreclosed public debate about controversial urban development projects, and how it reterritorialized nature-society relationships. We also give a central role to social contestation against the implementation of offsetting in England, drawing attention to its class character and highlighting the potential for a new emancipatory politics that would encompass a ‘right to nature’ as a key element of struggles for the ‘right to the city’.
214-225
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
e30e62ad-7e3c-4744-9929-261187c19b04
Adams, William M.
eee9af3f-f6fc-4d5a-be98-0691978fa360
11 February 2019
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia
e30e62ad-7e3c-4744-9929-261187c19b04
Adams, William M.
eee9af3f-f6fc-4d5a-be98-0691978fa360
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia and Adams, William M.
(2019)
Cutting nature to fit: urbanization, neoliberalism and biodiversity offsetting in England.
Geoforum, 98, .
(doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.013).
Abstract
In this paper, by drawing on primary empirical data obtained through 62 interviews in seven case studies we seek to offer a Marxist historical-geographical analysis of biodiversity offsetting policy in England, and its emergence in the context of the global economic crisis, and government aspirations for large-scale urban development projects. By paying attention to the interplay between offsetting, urbanization and the neoliberal reconstruction of conservation, we aim to extend the focus of the neoliberal conservation literature from the role of offsets as ecological ‘commodities’ to the way offsetting is used to support the production of space(s), place(s) and nature(s) in line with contemporary patterns of capitalist urban growth. In particular, we show how offsetting operationalized new ideas about nature as a stock of biodiversity, how it streamlined planning to support extended urbanization, how it foreclosed public debate about controversial urban development projects, and how it reterritorialized nature-society relationships. We also give a central role to social contestation against the implementation of offsetting in England, drawing attention to its class character and highlighting the potential for a new emancipatory politics that would encompass a ‘right to nature’ as a key element of struggles for the ‘right to the city’.
Text
1-s2.0-S0016718517301483-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 29 May 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 June 2017
Published date: 11 February 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490574
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490574
ISSN: 0016-7185
PURE UUID: d7f9c006-d2c1-4a83-8ee0-6f726a5c1cd4
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 May 2024 16:50
Last modified: 01 Jun 2024 02:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Evangelia Apostolopoulou
Author:
William M. Adams
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics