The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review

Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review
Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review
Objectives: there has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and examine the evidence relating to remote consultation in UK primary care on the experiences of patients with mental health conditions.

Methods: six major databases were searched for empirical studies published in the English language between 1 January 2010 and 21 October 2022. Studies were included where remote consultation occurred between a patient and primary care clinician. Outcomes of interest include mode of remote consultation, patient experiences and characteristics. Final included studies were assessed for quality, and results analysed with narrative synthesis.

Results: six studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of mental health conditions and remote consultation modalities (telephone, video, online, email, text-based). Patients were overall satisfied with remote consultation, with particular benefit for certain mental health conditions or anxious patients. However, several studies found that face-to-face was the preferred method, with highlighted negatives to remote consultation, such as inflexibility of online formats. Acceptability of remote consultation is context specific and influenced by the purpose of the consultation and individual patient. Remote consultation may reduce anxiety in some patients, but is potentially less acceptable than face-to-face for relational appointments.

Conclusions: acceptability of remote consultation is context dependent. There is a lack of evidence surrounding patient characteristics and access to remote consultation.
Primary care, mental health, patient acceptance of health care, patient satisfaction, remote consultation
2055-2076
Antonio, Serena
2c40afed-1a03-445e-86cc-bb54fe8ce075
Parsons, Joanne
a0ecd433-2fc5-45c1-ab3c-58c1cb28f281
Joseph, David
5dd4904b-49bc-4bd9-98b0-9a72a0ba53a8
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Antonio, Serena
2c40afed-1a03-445e-86cc-bb54fe8ce075
Parsons, Joanne
a0ecd433-2fc5-45c1-ab3c-58c1cb28f281
Joseph, David
5dd4904b-49bc-4bd9-98b0-9a72a0ba53a8
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1

Antonio, Serena, Parsons, Joanne, Joseph, David and Atherton, Helen (2024) Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review. Digital Health, 10. (doi:10.1177/20552076241233969).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Objectives: there has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and examine the evidence relating to remote consultation in UK primary care on the experiences of patients with mental health conditions.

Methods: six major databases were searched for empirical studies published in the English language between 1 January 2010 and 21 October 2022. Studies were included where remote consultation occurred between a patient and primary care clinician. Outcomes of interest include mode of remote consultation, patient experiences and characteristics. Final included studies were assessed for quality, and results analysed with narrative synthesis.

Results: six studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of mental health conditions and remote consultation modalities (telephone, video, online, email, text-based). Patients were overall satisfied with remote consultation, with particular benefit for certain mental health conditions or anxious patients. However, several studies found that face-to-face was the preferred method, with highlighted negatives to remote consultation, such as inflexibility of online formats. Acceptability of remote consultation is context specific and influenced by the purpose of the consultation and individual patient. Remote consultation may reduce anxiety in some patients, but is potentially less acceptable than face-to-face for relational appointments.

Conclusions: acceptability of remote consultation is context dependent. There is a lack of evidence surrounding patient characteristics and access to remote consultation.

Text
antonio-et-al-2024-experiences-of-remote-consultation-in-uk-primary-care-for-patients-with-mental-health-conditions-a - Version of Record
Download (532kB)

More information

Published date: 7 March 2024
Keywords: Primary care, mental health, patient acceptance of health care, patient satisfaction, remote consultation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 490612
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490612
ISSN: 2055-2076
PURE UUID: 2b873879-de71-4e20-8dbd-01fbd2f69413
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 May 2024 16:41
Last modified: 01 Jun 2024 02:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Serena Antonio
Author: Joanne Parsons
Author: David Joseph
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×