Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review
Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review
Objectives: there has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and examine the evidence relating to remote consultation in UK primary care on the experiences of patients with mental health conditions.
Methods: six major databases were searched for empirical studies published in the English language between 1 January 2010 and 21 October 2022. Studies were included where remote consultation occurred between a patient and primary care clinician. Outcomes of interest include mode of remote consultation, patient experiences and characteristics. Final included studies were assessed for quality, and results analysed with narrative synthesis.
Results: six studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of mental health conditions and remote consultation modalities (telephone, video, online, email, text-based). Patients were overall satisfied with remote consultation, with particular benefit for certain mental health conditions or anxious patients. However, several studies found that face-to-face was the preferred method, with highlighted negatives to remote consultation, such as inflexibility of online formats. Acceptability of remote consultation is context specific and influenced by the purpose of the consultation and individual patient. Remote consultation may reduce anxiety in some patients, but is potentially less acceptable than face-to-face for relational appointments.
Conclusions: acceptability of remote consultation is context dependent. There is a lack of evidence surrounding patient characteristics and access to remote consultation.
Primary care, mental health, patient acceptance of health care, patient satisfaction, remote consultation
Antonio, Serena
2c40afed-1a03-445e-86cc-bb54fe8ce075
Parsons, Joanne
a0ecd433-2fc5-45c1-ab3c-58c1cb28f281
Joseph, David
5dd4904b-49bc-4bd9-98b0-9a72a0ba53a8
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
7 March 2024
Antonio, Serena
2c40afed-1a03-445e-86cc-bb54fe8ce075
Parsons, Joanne
a0ecd433-2fc5-45c1-ab3c-58c1cb28f281
Joseph, David
5dd4904b-49bc-4bd9-98b0-9a72a0ba53a8
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Antonio, Serena, Parsons, Joanne, Joseph, David and Atherton, Helen
(2024)
Experiences of remote consultation in UK primary care for patients with mental health conditions: A systematic review.
Digital Health, 10.
(doi:10.1177/20552076241233969).
Abstract
Objectives: there has been a rapid shift from face-to-face to remote consultation across healthcare settings. 90% of patients with mental health conditions are cared for entirely in primary care. Remote consultation can present challenges and benefits for patients with mental health conditions. The aim of this systematic review was to collate and examine the evidence relating to remote consultation in UK primary care on the experiences of patients with mental health conditions.
Methods: six major databases were searched for empirical studies published in the English language between 1 January 2010 and 21 October 2022. Studies were included where remote consultation occurred between a patient and primary care clinician. Outcomes of interest include mode of remote consultation, patient experiences and characteristics. Final included studies were assessed for quality, and results analysed with narrative synthesis.
Results: six studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a range of mental health conditions and remote consultation modalities (telephone, video, online, email, text-based). Patients were overall satisfied with remote consultation, with particular benefit for certain mental health conditions or anxious patients. However, several studies found that face-to-face was the preferred method, with highlighted negatives to remote consultation, such as inflexibility of online formats. Acceptability of remote consultation is context specific and influenced by the purpose of the consultation and individual patient. Remote consultation may reduce anxiety in some patients, but is potentially less acceptable than face-to-face for relational appointments.
Conclusions: acceptability of remote consultation is context dependent. There is a lack of evidence surrounding patient characteristics and access to remote consultation.
Text
antonio-et-al-2024-experiences-of-remote-consultation-in-uk-primary-care-for-patients-with-mental-health-conditions-a
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 7 March 2024
Keywords:
Primary care, mental health, patient acceptance of health care, patient satisfaction, remote consultation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 490612
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/490612
ISSN: 2055-2076
PURE UUID: 2b873879-de71-4e20-8dbd-01fbd2f69413
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 May 2024 16:41
Last modified: 01 Jun 2024 02:08
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Serena Antonio
Author:
Joanne Parsons
Author:
David Joseph
Author:
Helen Atherton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics