The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Is the fulfilment of objective wellbeing reflected in subjective wellbeing? A case study of vulnerable communities in Volta Delta, Ghana

Is the fulfilment of objective wellbeing reflected in subjective wellbeing? A case study of vulnerable communities in Volta Delta, Ghana
Is the fulfilment of objective wellbeing reflected in subjective wellbeing? A case study of vulnerable communities in Volta Delta, Ghana
There is growing interest in the measurement and conceptualisation of wellbeing
due to its increasing importance within policy outcomes; however, the understanding of how
different wellbeing outcomes associate within sustainability research is limited. This paper
uses household survey data from the vulnerable Volta Delta, South Ghana, as a case study to
illustrate the different philosophical approaches and measures of wellbeing, and the potential
impact upon policy interventions. The frequent use of objective wellbeing measures, such as
monetary poverty, within development policy is challenged as to whether it sufficiently
reflects overall wellbeing. For example, objective monetary measures may not incorporate the
intangible components of wellbeing, which can alternatively be captured within individuals’
self-evaluated, subjective wellbeing.
This study first outlines the conceptual and methodological choices required when
measuring wellbeing, before drawing on ideas of objective and subjective wellbeing to
examine whether these concepts from different disciplines align or oppose one another.
Contrasting theories within the literature justify this focus. By testing for associations between
objective and subjective wellbeing outcomes, this study highlights how the methodological
and conceptual choices made when measuring wellbeing can result in differing conclusions.
Despite statistically significant associations being found amongst some wellbeing measures,
results which show opposing outcomes highlight how subjective and objective wellbeing are
not entirely interchangeable. Our study concludes there is a benefit to incorporating both
objective and subjective measures in research and development targets across multiple scales
to more-comprehensibly capture, and improve our understanding of, human wellbeing in
vulnerable locations.
deltas, happiness, objective, poverty, subjective, wellbeing
1179-8602
1-35
Cannings, Laurence
d41b8fad-ab5e-4fd2-b96b-8d96834e2e8a
Hutton, Craig W.
9102617b-caf7-4538-9414-c29e72f5fe2e
Sorichetta, Alessandro
2b7adf4f-9af9-490f-b7cb-bf3deca6861f
Nilsen, Kristine
306e0bd5-8139-47db-be97-47fe15f0c03b
Cannings, Laurence
d41b8fad-ab5e-4fd2-b96b-8d96834e2e8a
Hutton, Craig W.
9102617b-caf7-4538-9414-c29e72f5fe2e
Sorichetta, Alessandro
2b7adf4f-9af9-490f-b7cb-bf3deca6861f
Nilsen, Kristine
306e0bd5-8139-47db-be97-47fe15f0c03b

Cannings, Laurence, Hutton, Craig W., Sorichetta, Alessandro and Nilsen, Kristine (2024) Is the fulfilment of objective wellbeing reflected in subjective wellbeing? A case study of vulnerable communities in Volta Delta, Ghana. International Journal of Wellbeing, 14 (2), 1-35, [3149]. (doi:10.5502/ijw.v14i2.3149).

Record type: Article

Abstract

There is growing interest in the measurement and conceptualisation of wellbeing
due to its increasing importance within policy outcomes; however, the understanding of how
different wellbeing outcomes associate within sustainability research is limited. This paper
uses household survey data from the vulnerable Volta Delta, South Ghana, as a case study to
illustrate the different philosophical approaches and measures of wellbeing, and the potential
impact upon policy interventions. The frequent use of objective wellbeing measures, such as
monetary poverty, within development policy is challenged as to whether it sufficiently
reflects overall wellbeing. For example, objective monetary measures may not incorporate the
intangible components of wellbeing, which can alternatively be captured within individuals’
self-evaluated, subjective wellbeing.
This study first outlines the conceptual and methodological choices required when
measuring wellbeing, before drawing on ideas of objective and subjective wellbeing to
examine whether these concepts from different disciplines align or oppose one another.
Contrasting theories within the literature justify this focus. By testing for associations between
objective and subjective wellbeing outcomes, this study highlights how the methodological
and conceptual choices made when measuring wellbeing can result in differing conclusions.
Despite statistically significant associations being found amongst some wellbeing measures,
results which show opposing outcomes highlight how subjective and objective wellbeing are
not entirely interchangeable. Our study concludes there is a benefit to incorporating both
objective and subjective measures in research and development targets across multiple scales
to more-comprehensibly capture, and improve our understanding of, human wellbeing in
vulnerable locations.

Text
3149-Article Text-12913-1-10-20240520 - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 February 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 May 2024
Published date: 21 May 2024
Keywords: deltas, happiness, objective, poverty, subjective, wellbeing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491094
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491094
ISSN: 1179-8602
PURE UUID: 62467dbb-c880-4f30-99ba-fda8786348b7
ORCID for Craig W. Hutton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-756X
ORCID for Kristine Nilsen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2009-4019

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Jun 2024 23:56
Last modified: 18 Jun 2024 01:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laurence Cannings
Author: Craig W. Hutton ORCID iD
Author: Alessandro Sorichetta
Author: Kristine Nilsen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×