Experimental parameter identification of nonlinear mechanical systems via meta-heuristic optimisation methods
Experimental parameter identification of nonlinear mechanical systems via meta-heuristic optimisation methods
Meta-heuristic optimisation algorithms are high-level procedures designed to discover near-optimal solutions to optimisation problems. These strategies can efficiently explore the design space of the problems; therefore, they perform well even when incomplete and scarce information is available. Such characteristics make them the ideal approach for solving nonlinear parameter identification problems from experimental data. Nonetheless, selecting the meta-heuristic optimisation algorithm remains a challenging task that can dramatically affect the required time, accuracy, and computational burden to solve such identification problems. To this end, we propose investigating how different meta-heuristic optimisation algorithms can influence the identification process of nonlinear parameters in mechanical systems. Two mature meta-heuristic optimisation methods, i.e. particle swarm optimisation (PSO) method and genetic algorithm (GA), are used to identify the nonlinear parameters of an experimental two-degrees-of-freedom system with cubic stiffness. These naturally inspired algorithms are based on the definition of an initial population: this advantageously increases the chances of identifying the global minimum of the optimisation problem as the design space is searched simultaneously in multiple locations. The results show that the PSO method drastically increases the accuracy and robustness of the solution, but it requires a quite expensive computational burden. On the contrary, the GA requires similar computational effort but does not provide accurate solutions.
Experimental nonlinear analysis, Meta-heuristic optimisation, Nonlinear dynamics, Nonlinear frequency response, Parameter identification
215-223
Martinelli, Cristiano
2f6f6785-db85-4835-8ef2-aff8211fef4d
Coraddu, Andrea
eb41a72b-88f2-43f2-b685-ed948f2aa818
Cammarano, Andrea
c0c85f55-3dfc-4b97-9b79-e2554406a12b
14 October 2023
Martinelli, Cristiano
2f6f6785-db85-4835-8ef2-aff8211fef4d
Coraddu, Andrea
eb41a72b-88f2-43f2-b685-ed948f2aa818
Cammarano, Andrea
c0c85f55-3dfc-4b97-9b79-e2554406a12b
Martinelli, Cristiano, Coraddu, Andrea and Cammarano, Andrea
(2023)
Experimental parameter identification of nonlinear mechanical systems via meta-heuristic optimisation methods.
Brake, Matthew R.W., Renson, Ludovic, Kuether, Robert J. and Tiso, Paolo
(eds.)
In Nonlinear Structures & Systems, Volume 1: Proceedings of the 41st IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics 2023.
Springer Cham.
.
(doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36999-5_28).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
Meta-heuristic optimisation algorithms are high-level procedures designed to discover near-optimal solutions to optimisation problems. These strategies can efficiently explore the design space of the problems; therefore, they perform well even when incomplete and scarce information is available. Such characteristics make them the ideal approach for solving nonlinear parameter identification problems from experimental data. Nonetheless, selecting the meta-heuristic optimisation algorithm remains a challenging task that can dramatically affect the required time, accuracy, and computational burden to solve such identification problems. To this end, we propose investigating how different meta-heuristic optimisation algorithms can influence the identification process of nonlinear parameters in mechanical systems. Two mature meta-heuristic optimisation methods, i.e. particle swarm optimisation (PSO) method and genetic algorithm (GA), are used to identify the nonlinear parameters of an experimental two-degrees-of-freedom system with cubic stiffness. These naturally inspired algorithms are based on the definition of an initial population: this advantageously increases the chances of identifying the global minimum of the optimisation problem as the design space is searched simultaneously in multiple locations. The results show that the PSO method drastically increases the accuracy and robustness of the solution, but it requires a quite expensive computational burden. On the contrary, the GA requires similar computational effort but does not provide accurate solutions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 October 2023
Published date: 14 October 2023
Venue - Dates:
41st IMAC, A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, 2023, , Austin, United States, 2023-02-13 - 2023-02-16
Keywords:
Experimental nonlinear analysis, Meta-heuristic optimisation, Nonlinear dynamics, Nonlinear frequency response, Parameter identification
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 491099
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491099
ISSN: 2191-5644
PURE UUID: 439334bc-3d54-4585-96aa-b7aef22d3a9c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jun 2024 23:57
Last modified: 12 Jun 2024 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Cristiano Martinelli
Author:
Andrea Coraddu
Author:
Andrea Cammarano
Editor:
Matthew R.W. Brake
Editor:
Ludovic Renson
Editor:
Robert J. Kuether
Editor:
Paolo Tiso
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics