The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Probiotics in pregnancy: inequities in knowledge exchange, attitudes, and use of probiotics in a socio-demographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample of pregnant Canadians

Probiotics in pregnancy: inequities in knowledge exchange, attitudes, and use of probiotics in a socio-demographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample of pregnant Canadians
Probiotics in pregnancy: inequities in knowledge exchange, attitudes, and use of probiotics in a socio-demographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample of pregnant Canadians

Background: pregnancy interventions, potentially including consumption of nutraceuticals like probiotics, represent possible avenues for preventing non-communicable diseases. However, evidence syntheses indicate that probiotic interventions, while effective in managing some pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational diabetes), do not confer health benefits to uncomplicated pregnancies. Messaging around probiotics in pregnancy is mixed, such that people with low-risk pregnancies may nevertheless feel pressure to spend limited resources on (costly) probiotics. To tailor knowledge exchange and support safe, equitable access to pregnancy probiotics when their prescription may be warranted, we need to understand who takes probiotics during pregnancy and under what conditions. 

Methods: we used chi-square and logistic regression analyses of anonymous, cross-sectional survey data from 341 pregnant Canadians of diverse socio-demographic backgrounds to assess which respondents, by socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pregnancy/pregnancy health indicators, were relatively likely to: perceive probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health and/or report taking probiotics during pregnancy. 

Results: forty-seven percent of respondents perceived probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health; 51 % reported consuming them. Probiotic attitudes and consumption were socio-demographically-patterned: higher-income, post-secondary-educated respondents disproportionately perceived probiotics as healthy and consumed them. There was no evidence of variation in probiotics attitudes or use by pregnancy health indicators. 

Conclusion: Socio-economic factors may be more important determinants of pregnancy probiotic use in this sample than indications for pregnancy complications. Clear guidelines on pregnancy probiotics that reflect current evidence are needed. Equitable access to probiotics should be facilitated for pregnant people likely to benefit from interventions (i.e., those with certain complications), supporting long-term health equity.

Functional foods, Health equity, Knowledge translation, Microbiome, Pregnancy, Probiotics
McKerracher, L.
fbdb8e61-5a2e-41a6-a2e3-b429fd7e79fb
Moffat, T.
96237a64-3039-4cbe-b9d3-ce5c2a06523a
Barker, M.E.
374310ad-d308-44af-b6da-515bf5d2d6d2
Murray-Davis, B.
fab94b32-bb78-4f8f-9986-bd4825c40bb5
Kennedy, K.M.
0a7cf863-6d14-4ffa-a7a5-469d021d3158
Bellissimo, C.J.
69878e53-9361-423d-aa90-7ef58c0335d7
Yeo, E.
81533424-1ac9-4e7f-a116-164014d1a978
Høtoft, D.
825c2c17-69af-43ba-9962-7df731417470
Zalot, L.
00da562d-8d1b-4eff-8d2b-2cb6f3c4f7d4
Parlette, V.
1927e48a-e670-4f07-a0d7-0b2363a1d6d7
Atkinson, S.A.
1d15bf1a-11e5-404a-8978-5294657cfa23
Sloboda, D.M.
6ce36e7c-9182-450e-820d-3de47c1fc5fb
McKerracher, L.
fbdb8e61-5a2e-41a6-a2e3-b429fd7e79fb
Moffat, T.
96237a64-3039-4cbe-b9d3-ce5c2a06523a
Barker, M.E.
374310ad-d308-44af-b6da-515bf5d2d6d2
Murray-Davis, B.
fab94b32-bb78-4f8f-9986-bd4825c40bb5
Kennedy, K.M.
0a7cf863-6d14-4ffa-a7a5-469d021d3158
Bellissimo, C.J.
69878e53-9361-423d-aa90-7ef58c0335d7
Yeo, E.
81533424-1ac9-4e7f-a116-164014d1a978
Høtoft, D.
825c2c17-69af-43ba-9962-7df731417470
Zalot, L.
00da562d-8d1b-4eff-8d2b-2cb6f3c4f7d4
Parlette, V.
1927e48a-e670-4f07-a0d7-0b2363a1d6d7
Atkinson, S.A.
1d15bf1a-11e5-404a-8978-5294657cfa23
Sloboda, D.M.
6ce36e7c-9182-450e-820d-3de47c1fc5fb

McKerracher, L., Moffat, T., Barker, M.E., Murray-Davis, B., Kennedy, K.M., Bellissimo, C.J., Yeo, E., Høtoft, D., Zalot, L., Parlette, V., Atkinson, S.A. and Sloboda, D.M. (2023) Probiotics in pregnancy: inequities in knowledge exchange, attitudes, and use of probiotics in a socio-demographically diverse, cross-sectional survey sample of pregnant Canadians. PharmaNutrition, 24, [100344]. (doi:10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100344).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: pregnancy interventions, potentially including consumption of nutraceuticals like probiotics, represent possible avenues for preventing non-communicable diseases. However, evidence syntheses indicate that probiotic interventions, while effective in managing some pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational diabetes), do not confer health benefits to uncomplicated pregnancies. Messaging around probiotics in pregnancy is mixed, such that people with low-risk pregnancies may nevertheless feel pressure to spend limited resources on (costly) probiotics. To tailor knowledge exchange and support safe, equitable access to pregnancy probiotics when their prescription may be warranted, we need to understand who takes probiotics during pregnancy and under what conditions. 

Methods: we used chi-square and logistic regression analyses of anonymous, cross-sectional survey data from 341 pregnant Canadians of diverse socio-demographic backgrounds to assess which respondents, by socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pregnancy/pregnancy health indicators, were relatively likely to: perceive probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health and/or report taking probiotics during pregnancy. 

Results: forty-seven percent of respondents perceived probiotics as beneficial to pregnancy health; 51 % reported consuming them. Probiotic attitudes and consumption were socio-demographically-patterned: higher-income, post-secondary-educated respondents disproportionately perceived probiotics as healthy and consumed them. There was no evidence of variation in probiotics attitudes or use by pregnancy health indicators. 

Conclusion: Socio-economic factors may be more important determinants of pregnancy probiotic use in this sample than indications for pregnancy complications. Clear guidelines on pregnancy probiotics that reflect current evidence are needed. Equitable access to probiotics should be facilitated for pregnant people likely to benefit from interventions (i.e., those with certain complications), supporting long-term health equity.

Text
1-s2.0-S2213434423000166-main - Version of Record
Download (448kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 4 May 2023
Published date: 8 May 2023
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
Keywords: Functional foods, Health equity, Knowledge translation, Microbiome, Pregnancy, Probiotics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491103
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491103
PURE UUID: b116091a-045f-40ab-bdc5-b6e9faf4b500
ORCID for M.E. Barker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2976-0217

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jun 2024 00:06
Last modified: 12 Jun 2024 01:34

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L. McKerracher
Author: T. Moffat
Author: M.E. Barker ORCID iD
Author: B. Murray-Davis
Author: K.M. Kennedy
Author: C.J. Bellissimo
Author: E. Yeo
Author: D. Høtoft
Author: L. Zalot
Author: V. Parlette
Author: S.A. Atkinson
Author: D.M. Sloboda

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×