The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Worker perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian hospitals

Worker perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian hospitals
Worker perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian hospitals
In the wake of global health crises, effective Disaster Risk Management (DRM) in healthcare has become more crucial than ever to ensure the continuity of medical services during disasters. In this context, the role of Healthcare Workers (HCWs), including doctors, nurses, and administrators, is pivotal across all DRM phases: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Their experiences and knowledge can provide meaningful insights into the effectiveness of current practices and identify the pathway for future improvements.We conducted two studies that assessed HCWs' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of DRM in Saudi Arabian public hospitals. The first study identified that perceptions of DRM efficacy varied among HCWs, with approximately 42% perceiving it as ineffective. Perceptions significantly differed across DRM phases: 36.5% found it ineffective in mitigation, 45.6% in preparedness, 40.2% in response, and 45.5% in recovery. Notably, there were significant regional variations, with the Central region perceived as the most effective, the Eastern and Western regions, and the Southern region as the least effective. These findings highlighted the need for a deeper understanding of the reasons behind these variations.To build upon the insights gained from our first study, we aimed to identify the factors that might influence HCWs' perceptions of DRM. According to the literature, a positive organisational culture with strong leadership, transparent communication, and efficient information flow might enhance HCWs' disaster response effectiveness. Moreover, HCWs' previous disaster experiences and comprehensive training can improve their preparedness and response capabilities. However, concerns over personal safety and mental health issues, such as anxiety or depression, can negatively impact their participation in DRM. Furthermore, geographical and environmental contexts can be crucial, especially for hospitals in disaster-prone or conflict-affected areas.Despite these insights from the literature, a significant research gap remains in understanding how these factors might influence HCWs' perceptions across the four DRM phases in Saudi Arabia's diverse regional contexts. Our second study addresses this gap by exploring these influencing factors through 24 in-depth semi-structured interviews across four public hospitals in the Eastern, Western, Southern, and Central regions of Saudi Arabia. The results of this study will be used to strengthen HCWs' resilience and guide policy formulation so that resource distribution can be optimised and a culture of preparedness tailored to Saudi Arabia's unique healthcare landscape can be developed. Hence, our findings can be crucial in ensuring that Saudi Arabia's hospital DRM strategies are comprehensive, multifaceted, and region-specific.
Risk Management, Healthcare Workers Perception
Alshehri, S.
0bdd3f22-db10-4f2b-9cef-7bdb74c832b8
Dawson, I.
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Katsikopoulos, K.V.
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba
Alshehri, S.
0bdd3f22-db10-4f2b-9cef-7bdb74c832b8
Dawson, I.
dff1b440-6c83-4354-92b6-04809460b01a
Katsikopoulos, K.V.
b97c23d9-8b24-4225-8da4-be7ac2a14fba

Alshehri, S., Dawson, I. and Katsikopoulos, K.V. (2024) Worker perceptions of disaster risk management in Saudi Arabian hospitals. 32nd Annual Conference: Risk in Time & Space, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece. 02 - 05 Jun 2024.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

In the wake of global health crises, effective Disaster Risk Management (DRM) in healthcare has become more crucial than ever to ensure the continuity of medical services during disasters. In this context, the role of Healthcare Workers (HCWs), including doctors, nurses, and administrators, is pivotal across all DRM phases: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Their experiences and knowledge can provide meaningful insights into the effectiveness of current practices and identify the pathway for future improvements.We conducted two studies that assessed HCWs' perceptions regarding the effectiveness of DRM in Saudi Arabian public hospitals. The first study identified that perceptions of DRM efficacy varied among HCWs, with approximately 42% perceiving it as ineffective. Perceptions significantly differed across DRM phases: 36.5% found it ineffective in mitigation, 45.6% in preparedness, 40.2% in response, and 45.5% in recovery. Notably, there were significant regional variations, with the Central region perceived as the most effective, the Eastern and Western regions, and the Southern region as the least effective. These findings highlighted the need for a deeper understanding of the reasons behind these variations.To build upon the insights gained from our first study, we aimed to identify the factors that might influence HCWs' perceptions of DRM. According to the literature, a positive organisational culture with strong leadership, transparent communication, and efficient information flow might enhance HCWs' disaster response effectiveness. Moreover, HCWs' previous disaster experiences and comprehensive training can improve their preparedness and response capabilities. However, concerns over personal safety and mental health issues, such as anxiety or depression, can negatively impact their participation in DRM. Furthermore, geographical and environmental contexts can be crucial, especially for hospitals in disaster-prone or conflict-affected areas.Despite these insights from the literature, a significant research gap remains in understanding how these factors might influence HCWs' perceptions across the four DRM phases in Saudi Arabia's diverse regional contexts. Our second study addresses this gap by exploring these influencing factors through 24 in-depth semi-structured interviews across four public hospitals in the Eastern, Western, Southern, and Central regions of Saudi Arabia. The results of this study will be used to strengthen HCWs' resilience and guide policy formulation so that resource distribution can be optimised and a culture of preparedness tailored to Saudi Arabia's unique healthcare landscape can be developed. Hence, our findings can be crucial in ensuring that Saudi Arabia's hospital DRM strategies are comprehensive, multifaceted, and region-specific.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2 June 2024
Venue - Dates: 32nd Annual Conference: Risk in Time & Space, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece, 2024-06-02 - 2024-06-05
Keywords: Risk Management, Healthcare Workers Perception

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491319
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491319
PURE UUID: 50a81f7e-29fb-429c-bfcb-71b1e6a2df00
ORCID for I. Dawson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-9682
ORCID for K.V. Katsikopoulos: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-1980

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jun 2024 16:52
Last modified: 20 Jun 2024 01:49

Export record

Contributors

Author: S. Alshehri
Author: I. Dawson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×