The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Capability and readiness of artificial intelligence for research funding organisations: A scoping review

Capability and readiness of artificial intelligence for research funding organisations: A scoping review
Capability and readiness of artificial intelligence for research funding organisations: A scoping review
Background: over the last decade, we have seen artificial intelligence being increasingly used in both public and private sectors. However, to understand the potential of AI for facilitating organisational processes, innovation, competitiveness and operational efficiency, there needs to be greater understanding of what AI is and what it isn’t, the utilities and considerations, and the potential avenues for AI implementation. This is particularly relevant for research funding organisations due to concerns regarding readiness, ethics and governance, and the ability of AI to reduce administrative burden and research bureaucracy.

Aims: to review and summarise the available evidence about the potential use, utility and considerations of AI use, capability and implementation to address the following question: What does the evidence say about the use of AI (e.g., in use and in development) and what AI tools are available that could inform funders’ processes?

Methods: a scoping review was undertaken with no study or language limits, and included literature not limited to any sector or academic discipline. Records were limited to the last three years (2022-2024) and included grey literature. Two academic databases, Web of Science and ProQuest, were searched, along with three grey literature sources: Google Scholar, Overton, and Business Source Complete in February 2024. A review of the web content of funding organisations was also conducted. Extraction, collation and summary of the evidence was carried out using a framework focusing on the utility and potential of AI and considerations and risks associated to the application of AI.

Preliminary Results: the findings of the review will be presented, highlighting the utility and potential benefits of AI, considerations and risks, and reflection on the ‘AI readiness’ of research funders. Other AI themes (e.g., governance, ethics, security) identified from the literature will also be addressed to understand the application and use of AI.

Value/Impact: the review will provide greater understanding of the use, appropriateness and acceptability of AI for research management practices and consider what processes and functions could be enhanced through the use of AI (where AI could add most benefit and where is it most needed for funding organisations). Although AI could offer insights to reduce the data management burden there also needs to be careful consideration of when, and in what circumstances, it may not be appropriate to implement AI.
Blatch-Jones, Amanda Jane
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Blatch-Jones, Amanda Jane
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652

Blatch-Jones, Amanda Jane (2024) Capability and readiness of artificial intelligence for research funding organisations: A scoping review. Research on Research Registry and Hub.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Background: over the last decade, we have seen artificial intelligence being increasingly used in both public and private sectors. However, to understand the potential of AI for facilitating organisational processes, innovation, competitiveness and operational efficiency, there needs to be greater understanding of what AI is and what it isn’t, the utilities and considerations, and the potential avenues for AI implementation. This is particularly relevant for research funding organisations due to concerns regarding readiness, ethics and governance, and the ability of AI to reduce administrative burden and research bureaucracy.

Aims: to review and summarise the available evidence about the potential use, utility and considerations of AI use, capability and implementation to address the following question: What does the evidence say about the use of AI (e.g., in use and in development) and what AI tools are available that could inform funders’ processes?

Methods: a scoping review was undertaken with no study or language limits, and included literature not limited to any sector or academic discipline. Records were limited to the last three years (2022-2024) and included grey literature. Two academic databases, Web of Science and ProQuest, were searched, along with three grey literature sources: Google Scholar, Overton, and Business Source Complete in February 2024. A review of the web content of funding organisations was also conducted. Extraction, collation and summary of the evidence was carried out using a framework focusing on the utility and potential of AI and considerations and risks associated to the application of AI.

Preliminary Results: the findings of the review will be presented, highlighting the utility and potential benefits of AI, considerations and risks, and reflection on the ‘AI readiness’ of research funders. Other AI themes (e.g., governance, ethics, security) identified from the literature will also be addressed to understand the application and use of AI.

Value/Impact: the review will provide greater understanding of the use, appropriateness and acceptability of AI for research management practices and consider what processes and functions could be enhanced through the use of AI (where AI could add most benefit and where is it most needed for funding organisations). Although AI could offer insights to reduce the data management burden there also needs to be careful consideration of when, and in what circumstances, it may not be appropriate to implement AI.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 16 May 2024
Venue - Dates: Research on Research Registry and Hub, 2024-05-16

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491352
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491352
PURE UUID: 987b93d4-0ed3-4ff8-a3af-efbdb84feb91
ORCID for Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-5561

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jun 2024 16:47
Last modified: 21 Jun 2024 01:38

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×