The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Camus' reception of Nietzsche's mythopoesis

Camus' reception of Nietzsche's mythopoesis
Camus' reception of Nietzsche's mythopoesis
Nietzsche uses mythopoesis in order to communicate a number of related ideas that can only be expressed in the medium of myth. His aim is to establish a rapport with his readers who through his mythopoeic works are called upon to act. The ideas Nietzsche attempts to communicate concern an attitude and disposition towards life he calls the Dionysian and the action his readers are called upon to perform relate to the social stratification of society with the aim of facilitating the emergence of 'great individuals'. However, Nietzsche also employs mythopoesis to communicate ideas concerning the mythopoeic method itself and the process of pursuing philosophical ideas in depths greater than usually attempted. In other words, Nietzsche uses mythopoesis in an attempt to make clear how mythopoesis works. To successfully establish a rapport with Nietzsche and correctly answer his calls to action one must receive his mythopoeic works as mythopoesis and not something else.

Albert Camus carried out his philosophical inquiries in the medium of myth. His early works, those in his 'Absurd' cycle, can be read explicitly as responses to Nietzsche's mythopoesis. In his works Camus always invites the readers to join him in his philosophical investigations. Reading Nietzsche in the light of Camus' work brings us much closer to discovering the meaning of his calls to action. However, Camus is neither merely a follower nor guide; his work brings out the meaning of Nietzsche's call but not uncritically. Careful study of Camus' response to Nietzsche's mythopoesis reveals those insights that are invaluable and those which require correcting.
University of Southampton
Lea, Simon
e7e2e5eb-0105-4bc2-94f5-1ce4785bf2a8
Lea, Simon
e7e2e5eb-0105-4bc2-94f5-1ce4785bf2a8
Ridley, Aaron
64d82169-aa92-4352-975d-2ef8bb3f2cc7
Janaway, Christopher
61c48538-365f-416f-b6f7-dfa4d4663475

Lea, Simon (2024) Camus' reception of Nietzsche's mythopoesis. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 224pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Nietzsche uses mythopoesis in order to communicate a number of related ideas that can only be expressed in the medium of myth. His aim is to establish a rapport with his readers who through his mythopoeic works are called upon to act. The ideas Nietzsche attempts to communicate concern an attitude and disposition towards life he calls the Dionysian and the action his readers are called upon to perform relate to the social stratification of society with the aim of facilitating the emergence of 'great individuals'. However, Nietzsche also employs mythopoesis to communicate ideas concerning the mythopoeic method itself and the process of pursuing philosophical ideas in depths greater than usually attempted. In other words, Nietzsche uses mythopoesis in an attempt to make clear how mythopoesis works. To successfully establish a rapport with Nietzsche and correctly answer his calls to action one must receive his mythopoeic works as mythopoesis and not something else.

Albert Camus carried out his philosophical inquiries in the medium of myth. His early works, those in his 'Absurd' cycle, can be read explicitly as responses to Nietzsche's mythopoesis. In his works Camus always invites the readers to join him in his philosophical investigations. Reading Nietzsche in the light of Camus' work brings us much closer to discovering the meaning of his calls to action. However, Camus is neither merely a follower nor guide; his work brings out the meaning of Nietzsche's call but not uncritically. Careful study of Camus' response to Nietzsche's mythopoesis reveals those insights that are invaluable and those which require correcting.

Text
Camus_Reception_Of_Nietzsche_S_Lea - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (1MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Simon-Lea
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Submitted date: 2024
Published date: 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491433
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491433
PURE UUID: f37e55e4-af9b-41ee-994c-9cfd55889c9c
ORCID for Christopher Janaway: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-8837

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jun 2024 16:32
Last modified: 17 Aug 2024 01:38

Export record

Contributors

Author: Simon Lea
Thesis advisor: Aaron Ridley
Thesis advisor: Christopher Janaway ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×