The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patient perceptions of glucocorticoid side effects: a cross-sectional survey of users in an online health community.

Patient perceptions of glucocorticoid side effects: a cross-sectional survey of users in an online health community.
Patient perceptions of glucocorticoid side effects: a cross-sectional survey of users in an online health community.
Objectives: to identify the side effects most important to glucocorticoid (GC) users through a survey of a UK online health community (Healthunlocked.com).

Design: online cross-sectional survey.

Setting: participants were recruited through Healthunlocked.com, an online social network for health.

Participants: adults who were currently taking GCs, or had taken GCs in the past month.

Method: responders scored the importance of listed side effects from 1 to 10, with 10 being of high importance to them. For each side effect, histograms were plotted, and the median rating and IQR were determined. Side effects were ranked by median ranking (largest to smallest) and then IQR (smallest to largest). The scores were categorised as low (scores 1–3), medium (scores 4–7) and high (scores 8–10) importance.

Results: 604 responders completed the survey. Histograms of side effect scores showed a skew towards high importance for weight gain, a U-shaped distribution for cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, eye disease and infections, and a skew towards low importance for acne. When ranked, the side effect of most importance to responders was weight gain (median score=9, IQR 6–10) followed by insomnia and moon face with equal median score (8) and IQR (5–10). Three serious side effects, CVD, diabetes and infections, were ranked of lower importance overall but had wide ranging scores (median score=8, IQR 1–10).

Conclusions: the three most highly rated side effects were not clinically serious but remained important to patients, perhaps reflecting their impact on quality of life and high prevalence. This should be taken into consideration when discussing treatment options and planning future GC safety studies.
2044-6055
Costello, Ruth
3dfa67da-750c-4e65-bde0-b3b73e3c32a1
Patel, Rikesh
6465245f-e0b0-40f8-a60f-dffefabc2677
Humphreys, Jennifer
2c6948ac-ab9b-47f2-94c7-f597ff0b8006
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc
Costello, Ruth
3dfa67da-750c-4e65-bde0-b3b73e3c32a1
Patel, Rikesh
6465245f-e0b0-40f8-a60f-dffefabc2677
Humphreys, Jennifer
2c6948ac-ab9b-47f2-94c7-f597ff0b8006
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc

Costello, Ruth, Patel, Rikesh, Humphreys, Jennifer, McBeth, John and Dixon, William G. (2017) Patient perceptions of glucocorticoid side effects: a cross-sectional survey of users in an online health community. BMJ Open, 7 (4), [e014603]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014603).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: to identify the side effects most important to glucocorticoid (GC) users through a survey of a UK online health community (Healthunlocked.com).

Design: online cross-sectional survey.

Setting: participants were recruited through Healthunlocked.com, an online social network for health.

Participants: adults who were currently taking GCs, or had taken GCs in the past month.

Method: responders scored the importance of listed side effects from 1 to 10, with 10 being of high importance to them. For each side effect, histograms were plotted, and the median rating and IQR were determined. Side effects were ranked by median ranking (largest to smallest) and then IQR (smallest to largest). The scores were categorised as low (scores 1–3), medium (scores 4–7) and high (scores 8–10) importance.

Results: 604 responders completed the survey. Histograms of side effect scores showed a skew towards high importance for weight gain, a U-shaped distribution for cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, eye disease and infections, and a skew towards low importance for acne. When ranked, the side effect of most importance to responders was weight gain (median score=9, IQR 6–10) followed by insomnia and moon face with equal median score (8) and IQR (5–10). Three serious side effects, CVD, diabetes and infections, were ranked of lower importance overall but had wide ranging scores (median score=8, IQR 1–10).

Conclusions: the three most highly rated side effects were not clinically serious but remained important to patients, perhaps reflecting their impact on quality of life and high prevalence. This should be taken into consideration when discussing treatment options and planning future GC safety studies.

Text
e014603.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (845kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 January 2017
Published date: April 2017

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491436
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491436
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: f4a7e8cd-705c-4edf-b5d7-3f2b8b72b9cd
ORCID for John McBeth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-2183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jun 2024 16:34
Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ruth Costello
Author: Rikesh Patel
Author: Jennifer Humphreys
Author: John McBeth ORCID iD
Author: William G. Dixon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×