The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Representativeness of a digitally engaged population and a patient organisation population with rheumatoid arthritis and their willingness to participate in research: a cross-sectional study

Representativeness of a digitally engaged population and a patient organisation population with rheumatoid arthritis and their willingness to participate in research: a cross-sectional study
Representativeness of a digitally engaged population and a patient organisation population with rheumatoid arthritis and their willingness to participate in research: a cross-sectional study
Objectives: to describe (1) the representativeness of (a) users of an online health community (HealthUnlocked.com (HU)) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and (b) paid members of an RA patient organisation, the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS), compared with the general RA population; and (2) the willingness of HU users with RA to participate in types of research (surveys, use of an app or activity tracker, and trials).

Methods: a pop-up survey was embedded on HU to determine the characteristics of users and their willingness to participate in research. An anonymous data set of NRAS member characteristics was provided by the NRAS (N=2044). To represent the general RA population, characteristics of people with RA were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) (N=20 594). Cross-sectional comparisons were made across the three groups.

Results: compared with CPRD, HU respondents (n=615) were significantly younger (49% aged below 55 years compared with 23% of CPRD patients), significantly more deprived (21% in the most deprived Townsend quintile compared with 12% of CPRD patients) and had more recent disease, with 62% diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 compared with 37% of CPRD patients. NRAS members were more similar to the CPRD, but significantly under-represented those aged 75 years or over and over-represented those aged 55–75 years compared with the CPRD. High proportions of HU users were willing to participate in future research of all types.

Conclusions: NRAS members were broadly representative of the general RA population. HU users were younger, more deprived and more recently diagnosed. HU users were willing to participate in most types of research.
2056-5933
Costello, Ruth
3dfa67da-750c-4e65-bde0-b3b73e3c32a1
Jacklin, Clare
746b3154-8f2e-4dc5-82cc-c49f019da61a
Evans, Matthew Jameson
e17be14a-eedc-4ef3-a2c8-d8a455ae62fd
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc
Costello, Ruth
3dfa67da-750c-4e65-bde0-b3b73e3c32a1
Jacklin, Clare
746b3154-8f2e-4dc5-82cc-c49f019da61a
Evans, Matthew Jameson
e17be14a-eedc-4ef3-a2c8-d8a455ae62fd
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc

Costello, Ruth, Jacklin, Clare, Evans, Matthew Jameson, McBeth, John and Dixon, William G. (2018) Representativeness of a digitally engaged population and a patient organisation population with rheumatoid arthritis and their willingness to participate in research: a cross-sectional study. RMD Open, 4, [e000664]. (doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000664).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: to describe (1) the representativeness of (a) users of an online health community (HealthUnlocked.com (HU)) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and (b) paid members of an RA patient organisation, the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS), compared with the general RA population; and (2) the willingness of HU users with RA to participate in types of research (surveys, use of an app or activity tracker, and trials).

Methods: a pop-up survey was embedded on HU to determine the characteristics of users and their willingness to participate in research. An anonymous data set of NRAS member characteristics was provided by the NRAS (N=2044). To represent the general RA population, characteristics of people with RA were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) (N=20 594). Cross-sectional comparisons were made across the three groups.

Results: compared with CPRD, HU respondents (n=615) were significantly younger (49% aged below 55 years compared with 23% of CPRD patients), significantly more deprived (21% in the most deprived Townsend quintile compared with 12% of CPRD patients) and had more recent disease, with 62% diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 compared with 37% of CPRD patients. NRAS members were more similar to the CPRD, but significantly under-represented those aged 75 years or over and over-represented those aged 55–75 years compared with the CPRD. High proportions of HU users were willing to participate in future research of all types.

Conclusions: NRAS members were broadly representative of the general RA population. HU users were younger, more deprived and more recently diagnosed. HU users were willing to participate in most types of research.

Text
e000664.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (319kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 25 May 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 June 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491474
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491474
ISSN: 2056-5933
PURE UUID: 6f9978cc-96f6-49bf-ad2d-f78df9873c0a
ORCID for John McBeth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-2183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jun 2024 17:11
Last modified: 25 Jun 2024 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ruth Costello
Author: Clare Jacklin
Author: Matthew Jameson Evans
Author: John McBeth ORCID iD
Author: William G. Dixon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×