Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: a systematic review
Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: a systematic review
Objective: people with long-term conditions require serial clinical assessments. Digital patient-reported symptoms collected between visits can inform these, especially if integrated into electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical workflows. This systematic review identified and summarized EHR-integrated systems to remotely collect patient-reported symptoms and examined their anticipated and realized benefits in long-term conditions.
Materials and methods: we searched Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. Inclusion criteria were symptom reporting systems in adults with long-term conditions; data integrated into the EHR; data collection outside of clinic; data used in clinical care. We synthesized data thematically. Benefits were assessed against a list of outcome indicators. We critically appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results: we included 12 studies representing 10 systems. Seven were in oncology. Systems were technically and functionally heterogeneous, with the majority being fully integrated (data viewable in the EHR). Half of the systems enabled regular symptom tracking between visits. We identified 3 symptom report-guided clinical workflows: Consultation-only (data used during consultation, n = 5), alert-based (real-time alerts for providers, n = 4) and patient-initiated visits (n = 1). Few author-described anticipated benefits, primarily to improve communication and resultant health outcomes, were realized based on the study results, and were only supported by evidence from early-stage qualitative studies. Studies were primarily feasibility and pilot studies of acceptable quality.
Discussion and conclusions: EHR-integrated remote symptom monitoring is possible, but there are few published efforts to inform development of these systems. Currently there is limited evidence that this improves care and outcomes, warranting future robust, quantitative studies of efficacy and effectiveness.
1752–1763
Gandrup, Julie
4039d16a-d6ce-4ae4-b593-12abd278aad0
Ali, Syed Mustafa
8a268226-ac7f-4087-ba0a-1d6d248aa745
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
van der Veer, Sabine N.
34f20db8-f374-49cf-b1ed-b02b639a9f01
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc
November 2020
Gandrup, Julie
4039d16a-d6ce-4ae4-b593-12abd278aad0
Ali, Syed Mustafa
8a268226-ac7f-4087-ba0a-1d6d248aa745
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
van der Veer, Sabine N.
34f20db8-f374-49cf-b1ed-b02b639a9f01
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc
Gandrup, Julie, Ali, Syed Mustafa, McBeth, John, van der Veer, Sabine N. and Dixon, William G.
(2020)
Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: a systematic review.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 27 (11), .
(doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa177).
Abstract
Objective: people with long-term conditions require serial clinical assessments. Digital patient-reported symptoms collected between visits can inform these, especially if integrated into electronic health records (EHRs) and clinical workflows. This systematic review identified and summarized EHR-integrated systems to remotely collect patient-reported symptoms and examined their anticipated and realized benefits in long-term conditions.
Materials and methods: we searched Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. Inclusion criteria were symptom reporting systems in adults with long-term conditions; data integrated into the EHR; data collection outside of clinic; data used in clinical care. We synthesized data thematically. Benefits were assessed against a list of outcome indicators. We critically appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results: we included 12 studies representing 10 systems. Seven were in oncology. Systems were technically and functionally heterogeneous, with the majority being fully integrated (data viewable in the EHR). Half of the systems enabled regular symptom tracking between visits. We identified 3 symptom report-guided clinical workflows: Consultation-only (data used during consultation, n = 5), alert-based (real-time alerts for providers, n = 4) and patient-initiated visits (n = 1). Few author-described anticipated benefits, primarily to improve communication and resultant health outcomes, were realized based on the study results, and were only supported by evidence from early-stage qualitative studies. Studies were primarily feasibility and pilot studies of acceptable quality.
Discussion and conclusions: EHR-integrated remote symptom monitoring is possible, but there are few published efforts to inform development of these systems. Currently there is limited evidence that this improves care and outcomes, warranting future robust, quantitative studies of efficacy and effectiveness.
Text
ocaa177
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 22 July 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 September 2020
Published date: November 2020
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 491485
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491485
PURE UUID: 8d1de68f-e1b2-4bf5-ad47-efd42bac29ca
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Jun 2024 16:37
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 03:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Julie Gandrup
Author:
John McBeth
Author:
Sabine N. van der Veer
Author:
William G. Dixon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics