The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: a systematic review of mobile apps

Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: a systematic review of mobile apps
Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: a systematic review of mobile apps
Background: chronic pain is the leading cause of disability. Improving our understanding of pain occurrence and treatment effectiveness requires robust methods to measure pain at scale. Smartphone-based pain manikins are human-shaped figures to self-report location-specific aspects of pain on people's personal mobile devices.

Methods: we searched the main app stores to explore the current state of smartphone-based pain manikins and to formulate recommendations to guide their development in the future.

Results: the search yielded 3,938 apps. Twenty-eight incorporated a pain manikin and were included in the analysis. For all apps, it was unclear whether they had been tested and had end-user involvement in the development. Pain intensity and quality could be recorded in 28 and 13 apps, respectively, but this was location specific in only 11 and 4. Most manikins had two or more views (n = 21) and enabled users to shade or select body areas to record pain location (n = 17). Seven apps allowed personalising the manikin appearance. Twelve apps calculated at least one metric to summarise manikin reports quantitatively. Twenty-two apps had an archive of historical manikin reports; only eight offered feedback summarising manikin reports over time.

Conclusions: several publically available apps incorporated a manikin for pain reporting, but only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating manikin-derived quantitative scores, or generating summary feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future developments should harness manikins’ digital nature and include robust validation studies. Involving end users in the development may increase manikins’ acceptability as a tool to self-report pain.

Significance: this review identified and characterised 28 smartphone apps that included a pain manikin (i.e. pain drawings) as a novel approach to measure pain in large populations. Only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating quantitative scores based on manikin reports, or generating manikin feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future studies should harness the digital nature of manikins, and establish the measurement properties of manikins. Furthermore, we believe that involving end users in the development process will increase acceptability of manikins as a tool for self-reporting pain.
327-338
Ali, Syed Mustafa
684b2fd7-0f78-40c7-9085-ff633aaa68e9
Lau, Wei J.
8790cd25-e60f-437c-9f79-a4f78aa84e1c
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc
van der Veer, Sabine N.
a26e1a0a-3c82-4466-9832-ba7bb4ae6c2c
Ali, Syed Mustafa
684b2fd7-0f78-40c7-9085-ff633aaa68e9
Lau, Wei J.
8790cd25-e60f-437c-9f79-a4f78aa84e1c
McBeth, John
98012716-66ba-480b-9e43-ac53b51dce61
Dixon, William G.
5dddafc1-ae5f-466e-8517-8369ee750cbc
van der Veer, Sabine N.
a26e1a0a-3c82-4466-9832-ba7bb4ae6c2c

Ali, Syed Mustafa, Lau, Wei J., McBeth, John, Dixon, William G. and van der Veer, Sabine N. (2021) Digital manikins to self-report pain on a smartphone: a systematic review of mobile apps. European journal of pain, 25 (2), 327-338. (doi:10.1002/ejp.1688).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: chronic pain is the leading cause of disability. Improving our understanding of pain occurrence and treatment effectiveness requires robust methods to measure pain at scale. Smartphone-based pain manikins are human-shaped figures to self-report location-specific aspects of pain on people's personal mobile devices.

Methods: we searched the main app stores to explore the current state of smartphone-based pain manikins and to formulate recommendations to guide their development in the future.

Results: the search yielded 3,938 apps. Twenty-eight incorporated a pain manikin and were included in the analysis. For all apps, it was unclear whether they had been tested and had end-user involvement in the development. Pain intensity and quality could be recorded in 28 and 13 apps, respectively, but this was location specific in only 11 and 4. Most manikins had two or more views (n = 21) and enabled users to shade or select body areas to record pain location (n = 17). Seven apps allowed personalising the manikin appearance. Twelve apps calculated at least one metric to summarise manikin reports quantitatively. Twenty-two apps had an archive of historical manikin reports; only eight offered feedback summarising manikin reports over time.

Conclusions: several publically available apps incorporated a manikin for pain reporting, but only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating manikin-derived quantitative scores, or generating summary feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future developments should harness manikins’ digital nature and include robust validation studies. Involving end users in the development may increase manikins’ acceptability as a tool to self-report pain.

Significance: this review identified and characterised 28 smartphone apps that included a pain manikin (i.e. pain drawings) as a novel approach to measure pain in large populations. Only few enabled recording of location-specific pain aspects, calculating quantitative scores based on manikin reports, or generating manikin feedback. For smartphone-based manikins to become adopted more widely, future studies should harness the digital nature of manikins, and establish the measurement properties of manikins. Furthermore, we believe that involving end users in the development process will increase acceptability of manikins as a tool for self-reporting pain.

Text
European Journal of Pain - 2020 - Ali - Digital manikins to self‐report pain on a smartphone A systematic review of mobile - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (496kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 October 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 November 2020
Published date: 15 January 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 491490
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/491490
PURE UUID: 9746a51b-622e-47c0-9d9f-40121f0839d8
ORCID for John McBeth: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-2183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Jun 2024 16:41
Last modified: 13 Nov 2024 03:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Syed Mustafa Ali
Author: Wei J. Lau
Author: John McBeth ORCID iD
Author: William G. Dixon
Author: Sabine N. van der Veer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×